Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Jesus is Not Safe
Jesus is Not Safe
Jesus is Not Safe
Ebook150 pages2 hours

Jesus is Not Safe

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Traditional ways of thinking about the teachings of Jesus are often bound to one system of thought or another. Such ways of thinking are typically greater expressions of society's thinking (whether in the church or in the world) than what Jesus taught. Jesus is Not Safe concerns some such ways, ways that a thoughtful disciple of Jesus needs to challenge.
LanguageEnglish
PublisherCascade Books
Release dateOct 29, 2018
ISBN9781532639630
Jesus is Not Safe
Author

Wang Bin Yu

Wang Bin Yu has taught at various theological institutions in Canada. He has been a Baptist missionary in Africa and was an Anglican pastor, and he is now living and teaching in China.

Related to Jesus is Not Safe

Related ebooks

Christianity For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Jesus is Not Safe

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Jesus is Not Safe - Wang Bin Yu

    Introduction

    The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe is a book that everyone should read. It is an allegory about Christian faith: the lion (whose name is Aslan) is Jesus; the witch is the devil; and the wardrobe is the kingdom of heaven. Close to the beginning of this little book, Susan and Lucy have a telling conversation with Mr. and Mrs. Beaver:

    But shall we see him? asked Susan. Why, Daughter of Eve, that’s what I brought you here for. I’m to lead you where you shall meet him, said Mr. Beaver. Is—is he a man? asked Lucy. Aslan a man! said Mr. Beaver sternly. Certainly not. I tell you he is the King of the wood and the son of the great Emperor-beyond-the-Sea. Don’t you know who is the King of Beasts? Aslan is a lion—the Lion, the great Lion. Ooh! said Susan, I’d thought he was a man. Is he—quite safe? I shall feel rather nervous about meeting a lion. That you will, dearie, and no mistake, said Mrs. Beaver; if there’s anyone who can appear before Aslan without their knees knocking, they’re either braver than most or else just silly. Then he isn’t safe? said Lucy. Safe? said Mr. Beaver; don’t you hear what Mrs. Beaver tells you? Who said anything about safe? ’Course he isn’t safe. But he’s good. He’s the King, I tell you.

    Jesus is good, but he is not safe. All who have Christian faith believe that Jesus is good: Jesus is good because in him we understand and experience the goodness of God—but few Christians believe that Jesus is not safe. Jesus is not safe because he calls us to turn from everything in the world that is between us and God: we are to repay curses with blessings and violence with love; we are to give our money to the poor; and we are to live for God and die to ourselves. Where the world says, you must live for number one, Jesus says what does it profit someone to gain the whole world and lose their soul? Where society says, become successful, Jesus defines success by humility—the first will be last, the greatest will be the least, and the proud will be humbled. Where the world prioritizes knowledge and power, Jesus prizes simplicity and humility. Where the world is concerned with what we do, Jesus is concerned with who we are. Jesus is not safe because he teaches that discipleship in him flies in the face of all that the world teaches—and if you do not follow the values of the world, you will not be successful in the eyes of the world. Everything about Jesus and his kingdom is topsy-turvy and counterintuitive: Jesus was noble, but born in a barn; at his death, Jesus was a king with no followers, and he was a crucified messiah—a contradiction in terms.

    The world, the unreflective Christian, and even the church have sought to domesticate Jesus, to make him tame and safe. But like Aslan, Jesus cannot be domesticated, manipulated, or controlled. We want to put Jesus on a leash. We seek to control him through prayer, doctrine, tradition, our churches, or what we believe about the Bible. But while all such things may be good, even God-given, at best they can only point to Jesus and his kingdom. Rather than trying to domesticate Jesus, we must learn to be silent until the roar of Jesus overcomes all other voices—our individualistic voices, and the self-centered voices of humanity. In this little book, I hope to remind the reader that we have failed to domesticate Jesus, simply because Jesus is beyond our tiny box-like thinking.

    I have often heard people say things like, believing your way is to step on a slippery slope; and slippery slopes are dangerous, they are to be avoided. But the kingdom of God is itself a slippery slope, and following Jesus necessarily includes confidently running upon a slippery slope. Avoiding the slippery slope is to avoid the kingdom. Because we like safety and security, we have the tendency to stay away from danger; but no such choice is given to the follower of Jesus. The teachings of Jesus are radical and dangerous, even as they produce inner peace and calm. People who avoid stepping on the slippery slope have been deceived by the world—for the world says, follow me and all will be well, and Jesus says following me means living in my dangerous kingdom.

    How, it must be asked, has the world softened the message of Jesus? In the time of Jesus, it was the religious establishment that accused Jesus of being a disturber, a renegade, a blasphemer, and a false messiah. The religious authorities wanted security. They wanted control. They were threatened by anyone or any teaching that might challenge their security and control. Such religious authorities taught that challenging their power was to sin against God: living or teaching something that is contrary to Moses or to the traditions of the elders was to sin against God—and the religious authorities were alone the interpreters and stewards of Moses and the traditions. Making the people believe that disobeying the religious authorities was to disobey God was easy enough—for people also want security, and people will follow whatever power maintains their self-interests. What is true of the time of Jesus is equally true of today. In Jesus’ day there were the Pharisees, the Sadducees, the Essenes, the Sanhedrin, the Zealots—and many other groups with different belief systems. The religious authorities of today are more diverse than at the time of Jesus. Today there are evangelicals, mainline Protestants, independents and non-denominationals, liberals and conservatives, charismatics and fundamentalists, Roman Catholics and Orthodox—and scores of other subgroups and persuasions. While they differ in many ways, such groups all claim allegiance to Jesus and his kingdom; and, like the religious authorities of old, they are all profoundly concerned with maintaining power—such that they regard any departure from their way of thinking as a departure from God. This is how they maintain power and control.

    No doubt, there are beautiful Christians in every denomination—even as many folks in different persuasions at the time of Jesus truly wanted to follow God. One question that must concern us is, How can we help such people? The answer is not too complicated: we must encourage people to take their religious establishments with a grain of salt, not too seriously; we must encourage people to remember that all that counts is faith in Christ expressing itself in love. (I can hear protests: This is just what my group does. But every group says this!) The problem is not with any one group or another, but with the attitude that one has in becoming a member of any group. The answer is not to avoid groups or denominations, for being in a group is mandatory: Christians need to go to church (the New Testament knows nothing about people having a personal relationship with Jesus outside of being in community). The answer is the attitude that one has in being a member of a church.

    In this book I will explore the subject of Jesus being not safe. As with any book, one could easily go in a thousand different directions. The directions that I will explore are often academic; but this is not to say that my concerns are not practical. My concern is often with how poor thinking can lead one away from God, or good thinking can lead one toward God. If it is true that who we are and how we live is shaped by what we think, it is imperative that we think in a careful way. Part of the human condition is to complicate matters. In order to undo such complication and return to simplicity, it is often necessary to unwind the complexity. Doing so may involve cerebral activity, and so I apologize if this book seems to be complicated at points. All the same, I have confidence that the conclusions of this book have great bearing on discipleship in Jesus.

    1

    Believing Agnosticism

    As with other chapters in this book, the title of this chapter is oxymoronic. In what sense is belief agnostic? By agnostic I am not in any way questioning the existence of God. The term agnostic simply means against knowledge. One might say, with respect to the conclusions of Eastern medicine, I am largely agnostic. Such a statement in no way challenges the conclusions of Eastern medicine. The person who utters this statement, rather, is aware that they do not have the mental wherewithal to challenge or accept the conclusions of Eastern medicine. The believing agnosticism of which I speak is belief in God that cannot be rigidly defined because it is beyond anyone’s mental capacity to express it. Here is an allegory.

    A stream meanders its way through pastoral land before making a rapid descent down a mountainside and past a village. At this point, the stream transforms everything that comes into its path: earth, pebbles, roots, and the terrain itself. Even though they know very little about other streams, the villagers who live along the banks of this stream boast that their stream is unparalleled in the world. As the stream winds its way through the valley, it merges with another stream. Without studying its contents, one might suppose that this other stream had a glacial source—for the stream is as clear as it is frigid. Just as soon as the two streams converge, they together become a river, and the distinctiveness that they each enjoyed prior to their union is at that point lost: a botanist might note that this or that cellular matter had its origin in the mountain stream because such matter exists only on the banks of that stream, even as a geologist might determine that a given pebble came from the glacial stream because, like the valley through which the glacial stream meanders, the pebble has volcanic features. Long after the two streams merge to become a river, the river itself merges into a wider river, which welcomes scores of other streams and rivers into itself. This wide river, in turn, empties into an ocean.

    The stream made a rapid descent down the mountainside—such that it transformed everything in its path. This is akin to how the Western fascination with its particular understanding of rationality has foisted itself upon all other viewpoints, even as it has made itself the sole broker of any claim to truth. Something that fascinates me is the way in which Western Christians impose Western thinking upon the Bible—the very Bible that is replete with stories, declarations, and teaching that emphasize that human thinking is tiny and limited. That the truth of God is beyond human conceptualization is explicit in the following verse from the Old Testament.

    For my thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are your ways my ways, says the

    Lord

    .¹ For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts higher than your thoughts. (Isa 55:8–9)

    Here is a similar declaration in the New Testament.

    O the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways! Who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been his counsellor? Who has ever given to God, that God should repay him? For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be the glory forever. Amen. (Rom 11:33–36)

    Paul similarly tells us that the nature of the afterlife surpasses imagination, for in this life humanity can only know truth in part.

    No eye has seen, nor ear heard, no mind has conceived, what God has prepared for those who love him (1 Cor 2:9).

    Now I know only in part; then I will know fully, even as I have been fully known (1 Cor 13:12).

    Because faith in Christ is not subject to rational proofs, it is in the realm of the supra-rational. It follows that defending faith as if it

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1