Los Angeles Times

Editorial: Breaking up California should be much harder to do

If the "Three Californias" measure qualifies for the ballot later this spring - and there's no reason to think it won't - voters will be confronted with an existential question. With one check mark, they could start the process of breaking the 168-year-old Golden State into three pieces: the new states of California, Northern California and Southern California.

Voters might reasonably assume that a decision of such magnitude would come before them only after months, if not years, of study by academics, planning by elected officials and vetting

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times3 min read
Universal Studios Tram Tossed 'Multiple' Riders To The Ground, Accident Investigators Say
LOS ANGELES — A tram vehicle at Universal Studios Hollywood threw "multiple" riders to the ground after it struck a guardrail near props from the "Jurassic Park" film franchise in an accident that is under investigation by the California Highway Patr
Los Angeles Times4 min read
George Skelton: California's Budget Relies On The Richest Taxpayers, And We're Paying The Price
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Borrowing an old bromide, when the stock market sneezes, California's state government catches pneumonia. It's more than a common cold when the state coughs up billions of buckets in red ink. Wall Street recently has exhibited
Los Angeles Times5 min read
Avian Flu Outbreak Raises A Disturbing Question: Is Our Food System Built On Poop?
If it’s true that you are what you eat, then most beef-eating Americans consist of a smattering of poultry feathers, urine, feces, wood chips and chicken saliva, among other food items. As epidemiologists scramble to figure out how dairy cows throug

Related Books & Audiobooks