Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Quality and Safety in Neurosurgery
    Quality and Safety in Neurosurgery
    Quality and Safety in Neurosurgery
    Ebook591 pages6 hours

    Quality and Safety in Neurosurgery

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    Quality and Safety in Neurosurgery covers recent improvements and presents solutions for problems that impact patient care. This book is written for anyone who works at the intersection of quality, safety and neurosurgery, including neurosurgeons, neurologists, clinical researchers looking to improve outcomes in neurosurgery, hospital quality and safety officers, department leaders, fellows and residents. Edited by neurosurgeons who helped build the culture of quality and safety in the Department of Neurosurgery at UMN, this work emphasizes quality and safety, whether through ‘value based purchasing’, finding specialty specific quality and safety metrics, or just the professional desire to provide quality care.

    • Presents an overview of quality and safety in neurosurgical settings and discusses solutions for problems that impact patient care
    • Gives readers the tools they need to improve quality and safety in neurosurgery
    • Provides examples on how to implement new tactics
    • Includes coverage on teams, competence, safety, hospital incentives, quality, the physician handoff, medication compliance and operating room efficiency, and more
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherAcademic Press
    Release dateFeb 26, 2018
    ISBN9780128128992
    Quality and Safety in Neurosurgery

    Related to Quality and Safety in Neurosurgery

    Related ebooks

    Biology For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Opinion: Teach Medical Students To Use Diagnostic Tools With Their Patients

      Sep 19, 2018

      Medical students deserve to get consistent training in skills that define high quality, evidence-based, modern medical practice.

      3 min read

    • Article

      Opinion: Clinician-led Quality Improvements Can Transform A Hospital’s Care

      Feb 4, 2020

      The current national strategy for improving health care relies heavily on accountability based on metrics developed by outsiders. That's a fatal flaw.

      4 min read

    • Article

      The World’s Best Hospitals 2024

      Mar 8, 2024

      The World’s Best Hospitals 2024
      10 min read

    • Article

      Opinion: Real-world Evidence Is Changing The Way We Study Drug Safety And Effectiveness

      Jan 29, 2019

      Instead of waiting for fleshed-out protocols for using real-world evidence, pharmaceutical companies should dive in now using a commonsense approach that relies on rigor and reason.

      4 min read

    • Article

      Expanding Precision Medicine

      Jul 30, 2020

      Expanding Precision Medicine
      9 min read

    • Article

      Opinion: Electronic Health Records Are Still Waiting To Be Transformed

      Apr 11, 2019

      Electronic health records aren't yet a transformative tool to support clinical decision-making. Many physicians feel they have traded physical filing cabinets for digital ones.

      4 min read

    • Article

      Vital statistics

      Mar 25, 2020

      Vital statistics
      4 min read

    • Article

      Opinion: Synthetic Control Arms Can Save Time And Money In Clinical Trials

      Feb 5, 2019

      Synthetic control arms aren't the solution to all of the challenges facing randomized trials, but they represent a great way for drug development companies to start using real-world evidence.

      4 min read

    • Article

      Opinion: How One Pharmaceutical Company Is Reinventing The Clinical Trial

      Sep 21, 2018

      It's time to make clinical trials more rewarding for patients and investigators, and speed the delivery of new therapies. Here's how one company is doing that.

      5 min read

    • Article

      Opinion: What Tom Brady And Beyoncé Can Teach Surgeons: Coaching Can Keep You Sharp

      Apr 22, 2019

      Aspiring surgeons undergo years of supervised training before they can operate independently. But after that training is over, they are on their own for maintaining and improving their skills.

      3 min read

    • Article

      Opinion: Hospital Mergers Or Acquisitions May Cause Short-term Patient Safety Issues

      Jul 31, 2018

      "Better patient care" is the reason usually given for hospital and health systems mergers. That doesn't always happen at the start.

      4 min read

    • Article

      Opinion: All Study Participants Have A Right To Know Their Own Results. My Lab Has Been Doing That For Years

      Sep 5, 2018

      Giving study participants their individual results can drive greater public participation in research, increased support for science, and better health.

      6 min read

    • Article

      The World’s Best Hospitals2023

      Mar 10, 2023

      The World’s Best Hospitals2023
      9 min read

    • Article

      Primary Care Docs Can Do It All (with 6 Extra Working Hours)

      Dec 19, 2018

      The average primary care doctor would need to work six additional hours a day to make sure their patients get all the preventive and early detection care they want and deserve, a new study finds. Primary care doctors’ sleep, personal hygiene, and fam

      4 min read

    • Article

      National Academies Panel Urges Researchers To Routinely Share Test Results With Study Participants

      Jul 10, 2018

      "It's really calling for a sea change," said the author of a new National Academies report urging the routine release of test results to participants in human research.

      3 min read

    • Article

      Opening The ‘Black Box,’ Google DeepMind AI System Diagnoses Eye Diseases And Shows Its Work

      Aug 13, 2018

      Experts said the level of accuracy is impressive, but the bigger breakthrough is the DeepMind system’s solution to the so-called “black box” problem of artificial intelligence.

      5 min read

    • Article

      Opinion: Machine Learning For Clinical Decision-making: Pay Attention To What You Don’t See

      Dec 12, 2019

      Don't take results from machine learning algorithms at face value. Ask what information isn't available. What subgroups haven't been prioritized? Who is on the research team?

      4 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Quality and Safety in Neurosurgery

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Quality and Safety in Neurosurgery - Daniel J. Guillaume

      book.

      Section 1

      The Importance of Quality and Safety in Neurosurgery

      Chapter 1

      The Many Perspectives of Quality and Safety in Neurosurgery

      David Freeman; Daniel J. Guillaume¹    Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States

      ¹ Corresponding author e-mail: dguillau@umn.edu

      Abstract

      Recent years have seen a steady increase in the attention paid to quality and safety with regard to hospitalized patients. The topic has transitioned from being a lofty ideal to one that is put into practice in a myriad of ways in hospitals across the country every day. This evolution has taken several decades and shapes a great deal how care is provided for current neurosurgical patients. This chapter discusses the variety of different perspectives among those involved in quality and safety initiatives as pertaining to neurosurgery patients, including clinical care providers, allied health professionals, patients, administrators, and payers. We discuss the layers of complexity added with each perspective, and the challenges faced in improving safety and quality from all perspectives.

      Keywords

      Neurosurgery; Quality; Safety; Quality improvement (QI); Patient-centered; Database; Standards; Mortality and morbidity (M&M); Communication; Survey

      Outline

      Introduction

      Clinical Care Providers

      Allied Health Professionals

      Patients

      Administrators

      Payers

      Conclusions

      References

      Introduction

      The importance of the details of caring for a neurosurgical patient has increasingly become the focus of many groups that are involved in the patient's clinical care. In large part, this focus has been driven by the field of quality and safety or quality improvement (QI). Patients have long assumed that their best interests were at the forefront of the care they experience in the hospital and while this is true from a philosophical perspective, the practice of such an assumption is more difficult to enact. In America, these ideas were articulated and put into an early framework by Dr. Ernest Avery Codman, who was quoted as saying, The truth is, the patients and the public suppose somebody is looking into this important matter. They do not realize that the responsibility is not fixed upon any person. He also advocated for the End Result Idea, which was the premise that hospitals would measure the effectiveness of the treatments they administered to patients. It was a thought that not many shared at the time, but unfortunately he did not live to see his ideas fully appreciated. However, this idea did help lead to the creation of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and a published minimum standard for hospitals which became the preamble to what would eventually become The Joint Commission and the genesis of the field of quality and safety.

      The most current and accepted definitions of quality and safety come from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the National Quality Forum, respectively, where quality is defined as the degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge and safety as the prevention and mitigation of harm caused by errors of omission or commission that are associated with healthcare and involving the establishment of operational systems and processes that minimize the likelihood of errors and maximize the likelihood of intercepting them when they occur. Both definitions embody the spirit that Dr. Codman initially posited but they also make clear the dynamic nature of the field of quality and safety. It continues to change and evolve as the patient and caregiver relationship become more complex and nuanced, particularly as innovative technologies and new groups with different perspectives are brought to the hospital and clinic setting. The IOM further defines specific dimensions of Healthcare quality which include the following¹:

      1.Accessible—timely use of personal health services to achieve the best possible outcomes.

      2.Client-centered—care is respectful of, and responsive to, individual client preferences, needs, and values.

      3.Effective—scientific knowledge provides the basis to the services that are provided to all who could benefit.

      4.Efficient—waste is avoided.

      5.Equitable—patient characteristics such as age, gender, and ethnicity do not affect the quality of care.

      It seems inherently clear why the field of quality and safety is so important. However, the magnitude of its impact may not be fundamentally obvious, as a highly functioning quality and safety program will quietly performs its function in the background of the patient's clinical experience. Consider that annually approximately 100,000 American patients are injured while obtaining incorrect clinical care.² As recently as 1999, fatal medical errors were one of the top 10 causes of death in the United States.² Hospitals and healthcare systems are also supremely interested in quality and safety as many Medicare reimbursements are tied to quality measures, and in fact penalties are enforced for poor quality outcomes. While these facts summarize the toll on the patient, there are also financial and economic effects from these errors. In 1960, healthcare spending was 5% of the gross domestic product (GDP), and in 2008 it had grown to 17% with estimates from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) predicting an increase by 2018 to 20% of the GDP, or approximately $4.4 trillion dollars.³ Considering these economic facts as well as the healthcare system's financial well-being and the health and welfare of the patient, it becomes clear pretty quickly that this area of quality and safety is important and that it has many facets that affect many different people.

      Neurosurgery is in a unique position as a high-risk surgical specialty that has recently realized the importance of quality and safety. The breadth of neurosurgical practice and the heavy emphasis on experiential training make even basic data gathering regarding practice standards and outcomes difficult. Other areas such as General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery have implemented large, accessible national databases (National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, or NSQUIP and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Database) to collect outcomes data. Given the small size of the field of neurosurgery and its complexity, it lagged behind other surgical subspecialties. In 2012, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) announced the launch of the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD), later changed to Quality and Outcomes Database (QOD) in 2016 to better represent the registrants.⁴ This database represents a tangible starting point for the field of Neurosurgery to begin to assess the quality and safety of its specific and unique surgical practices. However, adoption and implementation of new practices will require dedicated personnel to be successful.⁴ Besides workforces, an increasing amount of resources will be required to implement future programs and tools deemed to improve safety and quality. Yet these large shifts in thinking will be required if large-scale change is to be realized.

      There are many perspectives when it comes to examining quality and safety in the field of neurosurgery. These perspectives can be grouped into several broad categories: clinical care providers, allied health professionals, patients, administrators, and payers.

      Clinical Care Providers

      The medical care of the neurosurgical patient is shared between providers with diverse backgrounds, credentialing, and responsibilities. Broad categories include: nurses, APP (physician assistants and nurse practitioners), physicians (attending/staff, fellows, residents), and medical students. Attending physicians, or the doctors with admitting and operating privileges at a specific hospital, bring decades of specific history and traditions from their training.⁵ In a 2011 study that documented associations between various healthcare providers and their opinions on quality and safety, attending physicians showed that safety was highly associated with training.⁵ Training of physicians, particularly in neurosurgery, is highly individualized with different residency programs having different foci and a unique breadth and depth of different patients. There also exists the opportunity for further fellowship training in various subspecialties within neurosurgery: Pediatrics, Trauma, Spine, Functional, Skull base, Oncology, and Neurocritical Care to name a few. A review of the quality and safety literature shows that there is no current study correlating fellowship training in neurosurgical subspecialty with improved outcomes. So while attending neurosurgeons associated increased training with safety, there has been no objective data to prove that.

      Another issue regarding quality and safety that has recently come under scrutiny, particularly for attendings in academic neurosurgery, is the performance of concurrent surgery or running two rooms. Owing to the recent attention that has been paid to the subject, there are not many published studies comparing the outcomes or cost of concurrent surgery. Zygourakis has published three separate articles detailing the lack of difference in cost, outcome, and 30-day readmission in academic vascular neurosurgery,⁶ spine surgery,⁷ and a general category of neurosurgical procedures.⁸ Obviously, this is a new and important issue to the field of neurosurgery, in particular the area of quality and safety, to ensure that all measures are taken to provide the patient with the best and safest care, particularly regarding their time in the operating room.

      Neurosurgery residency program directors have been tasked by the ACGME to enlist residents in QI projects and ensure their guidance through these projects. This selective group of academic attending neurosurgeons is in a very unique position to help create a culture of safety not only in their respective departments, but in the field of neurosurgery as a whole and attempt to ensure an attention to quality and safety that will persist in the residents that they train. Their guidance and mentorship will hopefully help to create a generation of neurosurgeons who incorporate and engage in quality and safety projects throughout their careers.

      Resident physicians also have important roles in ensuring the quality and safety of neurosurgery patients as alluded to in the previous paragraph. Residents participate in all facets of a neurosurgical patient's care from clinic visits, Emergency Room visits, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) cares, bedside procedures, family meetings, and of course in the actual operating room. This ubiquity in their presence affords them the opportunity to see areas for improvement in delivering high-quality care to patients. A systematic review that was published in 2015 followed the outcomes of 26 separate studies involving safety education interventions for residents,⁹ and they were unable to find discrete evidence of the benefit to the patient. This should not serve to undermine emphasis on resident quality and safety projects, as this article only reports on projects involving resident education and omits projects that focus on changes in practice. Neurosurgery residents are given a unique opportunity during their postgraduate year-1 (PGY-1) to attend a national fundamentals curriculum put on by the Society of Neurological Surgeons (SNS). This practice began in 2010 and participation at the national level is approximately 95%.¹⁰ Given the unique position of neurosurgery PGY-1 residents to participate in bedside procedures and make critical decisions in acute settings, senior faculty leadership at the national level arranged and implemented this course. A follow-up study to assess the retention of the information was published in 2013.¹¹ This study provided self-reported data from the participants asking if the knowledge and skills they received training on during the boot camp improved patient care and 99% of the survey respondents felt that was indeed the case.¹¹ Providing neurosurgery residents with a strong foundation in bedside procedures and clinical decision-making as well as the culture of quality and safety is a great start to ensuring acceptance of future QI projects and an honest focus on the safety of the neurosurgical

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1