Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Lives of the Twelve Caesars: Nero
The Lives of the Twelve Caesars: Nero
The Lives of the Twelve Caesars: Nero
Ebook80 pages2 hours

The Lives of the Twelve Caesars: Nero

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

The Twelve Caesars, is a set of twelve biographies of Julius Caesar and the first 11 emperors of the Roman Empire written by Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus. The work, written in AD 121 during the reign of the emperor Hadrian, was the most popular work of Suetonius, at that time Hadrian's personal secretary, and is the largest among his surviving writings. The Twelve Caesars is considered very significant in antiquity and remains a primary source on Roman history.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateNov 1, 2012
ISBN9781625580627
The Lives of the Twelve Caesars: Nero

Related to The Lives of the Twelve Caesars

Related ebooks

Political Biographies For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for The Lives of the Twelve Caesars

Rating: 4.157894736842105 out of 5 stars
4/5

19 ratings22 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This book is really about six Caesars (Julius, Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius and Nero) and six men I never heard of before. Of the over 17 hours of the audiobook, just a little over 3 hours are devoted to the last six, but I was fine with that because I learned more about the Caesars I care about. Caligula and Nero are clearly the most entertaining, but Augustus is my favorite.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Interessant vanwege de overvloed aan details en anekdotes. Historiografie als verzameling van weetjes, ook als ze onwaar-schijnlijk zijn. Zeer veel aandacht aan wondertekens.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    My companion read to the fantastic "History of Rome" podcast. Amazing that the imperial political structure survived some of these early abuses of power and poor leadership. Each Caesar is given his accolades and critique, but there is definitely a bias in what is dwelled upon. Still, it seems a genuine attempt at accurate history with little revisionist propaganda
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Interessant vanwege de overvloed aan details en anekdotes. Historiografie als verzameling van weetjes, ook als ze onwaar-schijnlijk zijn. Zeer veel aandacht aan wondertekens.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    What a fantastic little book full of gossip and intrigue of the 12 emperors succeeding Julius Caesar and the fall of the Republic. Good translation By Robert Graves.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Do you enjoy drama? Gossip? Archaic methods of determining personality? Roman history? Did I mention gossip?You can find all of these in Suetonius' Twelve Caesars! Easily on of my favorite biographies (?) concerning Imperial Romans. I would certainly suggest it, even to those who aren't avid readers of roman history.There is, of course, the added benefit that it makes for a quick read!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I'm something of a nerd, and lately I've had a thing for reading original works...or at least English translations of them.

    The Twelve Caesars was as interesting as it gets, detailing the lives of the first 12 emperors of Rome after the fall of the republic. "Too many rulers is a dangerous thing" seems to be the prologue to this skim of the random details of twelve men's lives, debaucheries, and deaths.

    Maybe not the thing for you if seeking a theme or readable history, but a great perspective of the most powerful men in the world of their time by a contemporary of them.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    The Roman equivalent of Hollywood Babylon. Gossipy and scandalous, all the juicy, salacious details of the private lives of Rome's first 12 emperors. Suetonius was an archivist during the reign of Hadrian, which gave him access to the Imperial family's private records (and probably led to his eventual dismissal for some unknown pecccadillo, perhaps for delving too deep in things that should not have seen the light of day). Historians are divided about the validity and value of Suetonius' writing, however, since he provides the only known details about a number of important episodes in Rome's early Imperial history, it is a priceless record and high;y readble one for the layman and student.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Accurate? Probably not. Entertaining? Yes. It's hard to believe that the emperors who weren't popular with the aristocrats or senate, but were popular with the people, were the only ones with truly revolting sexual habits. On the other hand, Suetonius is obviously and admittedly recording rumors rather than facts, and it seems pretty likely that the bad sex habits correlate to something a bit wonky. I would have liked a bit more annotation, and a longer introduction, too.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A friend who teaches Latin for a living told me it was this book, along with Tacitus’ Annals, that made her fall in love with Ancient Rome and change her concentration. Suetonius was a secretary to one of the Roman emperors, Hadrian, so one would expect he’d have an understanding of imperial Rome and access to its records. He presents a colorful account of the first twelve emperors from Julius Caesar to Domitian. Along with Plutarch, he’s our source for most of the stories about Julius Caesar. A lot of the most famous tidbits and quotes I’ve heard concerning the early Roman emperors turned out to come from Suetonius. Suetonius’ Julius Caesar definitely comes across as autocratic and a ruthless, ambitious politician--but also (at least in comparison to his successors, or even Tacitus) humane and a superb leader. His successor and nephew Augustus is in comparison a chilly personality, even if an able administrator. After that Rome wasn’t so lucky. Suetonius’ account of Tiberius conforms to Tacitus’ picture of him as a man who started out decently and became more and more corrupt, especially once he retired to Capri. You think after what’s related of him no one can top Tiberius for depravity, but then after him sandwiching Claudius are Caligula and Nero. And well, if your picture of Claudius was formed by Robert Graves’ I, Claudius of someone wiser than he seemed:Unfortunately, when the combatants gave the customary shout of: ‘Hail, Emperor, those who are about to die salute you!’ he joked: ‘Or not, as the case may be!’ so they all refused to fight maintaining that his words amounted to a pardon. He dithered for a while as to whether to have them all massacred in their burning ships, but at last leapt from his throne and hobbling ridiculously up and down the shoreline, in his shambling manner, induced them, by threats and  promises combined, to fight. Twelve Sicilian triremes then fought twelve from Rhodes, the signal being given by a mechanical Triton, made of silver, which emerged from the middle of the lake and blew its horn.This Claudius didn’t just pretend to be a stupid fool to survive. He owned stupid--add cruel as well. Nero’s death marks the end of the Julio-Claudian dynasty and the “Year of Four Emperors” because before a year was over there were three more: Galba, Otho and Vitellius. Galba and Vitellius were cruel and corrupt, even if not as monstrous as Caligula and Nero, Otho in over his head. Then the Flavian dynasty arose, Vespasian, Titus and Domitian, restoring stability. Vespasian from this account seems the first decent emperor--in competence and character--since Augustus. His elder son Titus is even described as *gasp* “kind-hearted” and just; he instituted both prohibitions against double jeopardy and a statute of limitations. Alas, the best that can be said about his brother Domitian, the last of the emperors treated here, is that he’s not as heinous as Caligula or Nero.Tacitus covers some of the same material, from Tiberius to Nero, but Suetonius fills in quite a few gaps. It’s not easy to tell in translation, but Tacitus strikes me as the better writer, deeper thinker, and more trustworthy historian, but Suetonius is (even) more gossipy--in fact at some points it’s a bit much. At one point he says of Tiberius’ depravities that they are “things scarcely to be told or heard, let alone credited,”--which didn’t stop Suetonius going on to give us all the gory details. I had to pause for brain bleach--seriously folks. But boring he isn’t. (Except when he goes on and on about auguries and omens and portents.) All in all, if choosing just one to read, I’d put Tacitus first--but Suetonius was certainly worth reading.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This biographies of the twelve Caesars who ruled Rome from Julius Caesar (49-44 B.C.) to Domitian (81-96 A.D.) This edition was translated by Robert Graves and was the basis for his work I Claudius; if you ever had the good fortune of watching the PBS series of that same name, I think you’ll really enjoy this book.The first six Caesars are larger than life, starting with Julius of course; you’ll find all of the major elements of his life, e.g. crossing the Rubicon, declaring Vini, Vidi, Vici, having his tryst with Cleopatra, and getting assassinated. The chapters that follow on the imperious Augustus, the dour and perverted Tiberius, the insane and cruel Caligula, the stuttering and somewhat dimwitted Claudius, and the vain and lecherous Nero are all very interesting. Suetonius provides historical facts and insights into life in Rome at the time, but is most known for how he delves into the personal lives of the Caesars and their debaucheries. It can feel a bit gossipy at times but I suspect most of it is true, and it certainly makes for interesting reading. The cruelty, corruption, and sexual perversion is a window into the time, and an obvious reminder of that old adage about absolute power. The “back six” – Galba, Otho, Vitellius, Vespasian, Titus, and Domitian, were a bit less interesting, even though they had most of the same characteristics, probably because they were lesser known to me. These chapters are much shorter than the others though. I might knock my review score down half a star for that, but the illustrated edition more than makes up for it. It’s chock full of color and black and white photographs of ruins, works of art, images of the Caesars, and artifacts for the time – I highly recommend that if you’re going to read the book, to get this version.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Not quite as good as Tacitus' Annals and I found myself questioning much of Suetonius' research. But of course this period is one of the most fascinating in all of human history, and tales of Nero's and Caligula's craziness are always worth laughing at.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus was a prolific writer who lived between 69-130 AD.His only surviving work is An essential and very readable collection of essays about the Roman Emperors from Julius Caesar to Hadrian written by Hadrian's personal secretary. Suetonius had access to the imperial archives and, in the case of some of the later emperors, some eyewitnesses to history. Given who Suetonius worked for and the politics of his times, there are many biases, conflicting stories, and untruths (like the legends about Nero singing while Rome burned) in his accounts of former emperors. This is the work of a court historian who is obliged to follow the party line. That said, Hadrian's reign had a very strong "good governance" theme to it so no apologies are made for the tyrants that preceded him. Hadrian, the scribe's boss, emerges well even though he eventually fired Suetonius for some offense or insult against the Empress.Anyone interested in a sweeping overview of one of the most fascinating times in history, and the colorful, ruthless, often brilliant and sometimes insane men who made it to the top of the heap should read this book. Rich with intrigue, "The Twelve Caesars" stands alone as a study of leadership and absolute power, rich with anecdotes and scandals, deep in detail. No history degree required, it's a must for any novelist working in this period.Just for kicks, get the edition that was translated by Robert Graves, the poet and author of "I, Claudius."
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Being a student of classics and I myself falling in tandem with modern scholars over the accuracy of Suetonius' accounts believe they should be taken with more than a pinch of salt.Especially when you notice that as he progresses further through his Lives he refers to less sources and presents many rumours as facts.Reading Suetonius only highlights how much better an historian Tacitus was.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A very interesting look into the lives of the Caesars. I loved reading "The Twelve Caesars." There are parts that are disturbing and parts that are hilarious, like Suetonius' portrayal of Claudius. I would definitely recommend this book to anyone with an interest in Rome.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    If you thought salacious tell-all celebrity biographies were a 20th Century phenomenon, think again! Gaius Suetonius Tranquillus was a 1st Century Roman nobleman who worked as secretary for both the emperors Trajan and Hadrian: his position in the Imperial household did not stop him penning the most gossipy and scandalous histories of former holders of the highest office. Tellingly, he did not write about the two men under whom he had served: I don't know what the laws of libel were like back in 75 AD [roughly the time of writing] but many of the things Suetonius said would have got him killed had the charges been leveled against someone strill living.Caligula, for example, was not only insane, he was also incestuous, pimped out his royal sisters, turned the palace into a brothel and tried to make his horse a consul - the rough equivalent of a Prime Minister.However, Caligula's name is a byword by depravity and we would expect no less: we might be surprised however at his description of Julius Caesar as an epileptic with a high-pitched voice and a comb-over, he enjoyed taking it up the bum, or Tiberius as a perverse and vicious brute. Claudius drooled, had a bad stutter and was also prone to fits: he was a greedy drunkard, weak, cruel and stupid - but still a paragon of all the virtues when compared with his successor, the infamous Nero, about whom the only good thing he has to say is that he was a gifted musician. On the other hand, Suetonius started the rumour that Nero fiddled while Rome burned.Great stuff, a real page turned even now. If you thought the Romans were stuffy, read the Twelve Caesars and think again! Also pity our poor modern biographers who have such tame fodder to work with...
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This is a pleasure from beginning to end and started me on a long streak of reading original Roman and Greek authors. Suetonius is not always reliable, but he is the source of so many things that have entered our culture and our language. Reading this book will create more "a-ha" moments for a reasonably intelligent reader than just about anything else I can think of. Robert Graves translation is excellent, as one would expect from reading his own books.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    If you thought ancient history was dry and dull... you haven't read Suetonius!
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A dictionary of vice and lechery.Suetonius at least attempts to give accounts of family history, political careers, public works, and so forth, but just can't wait to get to the juicy stuff: gossip and scandal quite beyond today's impetuous pop stars and politicians, thrilling and unbelievable. It definitely gives history some zip.His physical descriptions ("spindly-legged") are fun, too.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Great, fun read even though it's not always historically accurate.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Suetonius is the more entertaining colleague of Tacitus. Tacitus is widely considered the more reliable historian, but Suetonius is more fun. He has included the gossip, the sordid rumours and dirty limericks of ancient rome. While it must be taken with a grain of salt, it makes for a vivid read.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Graves's translation of Seutonious allows the modern reader an intimate look into the personal lives of the first Roman emperors. These are useful clues into the attitudes of Romans and the workings of the early Empire. Although it seems Seutonious had an agenda of his own, his information seems credible and useful, and always interesting.

Book preview

The Lives of the Twelve Caesars - G. Suetonias Tranquillis

The Lives of the Twelve Caesars

Nero Claudius Caesar.

By C. Suetonius Tranquillus

Start Publishing LLC

Copyright © 2012 by Start Publishing LLC

All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book or portions thereof in any form whatsoever.

First Start Publishing eBook edition October 2012

Start Publishing is a registered trademark of Start Publishing LLC

Manufactured in the United States of America

10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

ISBN 978-1-62558-062-7

Nero Claudius Caesar

I. Two celebrated families, the Calvini and Aenobarbi, sprung from the race of the Domitii. The Aenobarbi derive both their extraction and their cognomen from one Lucius Domitius, of whom we have this tradition: —As he was returning out of the country to Rome, he was met by two young men of a most august appearance, who desired him to announce to the senate and people a victory, of which no certain intelligence had yet reached the city. To prove that they were more than mortals, they stroked his cheeks, and thus changed his hair, which was black, to a bright colour, resembling that of brass; which mark of distinction descended to his posterity, for they had generally red beards. This family had the honour of seven consulships , one triumph , and two censorships ; and being admitted into the patrician order, they continued the use of the same cognomen, with no other praenomina than those of Cneius and Lucius. These, however, they assumed with singular irregularity; three persons in succession sometimes adhering to one of them, and then they were changed alternately. For the first, second, and third of the Aenobarbi had the praenomen of Lucius, and again the three following, successively, that of Cneius, while those who came after were called, by turns, one, Lucius, and the other, Cneius. It appears to me proper to give a short account of several of the family, to show that Nero so far degenerated from the noble qualities of his ancestors, that he retained only their vices; as if those alone had been transmitted to him by his descent.

II. To begin, therefore, at a remote period, his great-grandfather’s grandfather, Cneius Domitius, when he was tribune of the people, being offended with the high priests for electing another than himself in the room of his father, obtained the transfer of the right of election from the colleges of the priests to the people. In his consulship , having conquered the Allobroges and the Arverni , he made a progress through the province, mounted upon an elephant, with a body of soldiers attending him, in a sort of triumphal pomp. Of this person the orator Licinius Crassus said, It was no wonder he had a brazen beard, who had a face of iron, and a heart of lead. His son, during his praetorship , proposed that Cneius Caesar, upon the expiration of his consulship, should be called to account before the senate for his administration of that office, which was supposed to be contrary both to the omens and the laws. Afterwards, when he was consul himself , he tried to deprive Cneius of the command of the army, and having been, by intrigue and cabal, appointed his successor, he was made prisoner at Corsinium, in the beginning of the civil war. Being set at liberty, he went to Marseilles, which was then besieged; where having, by his presence, animated the people to hold out, he suddenly deserted them, and at last was slain in the battle of Pharsalia. He was a man of little constancy, and of a sullen temper. In despair of his fortunes, he had recourse to poison, but was so terrified at the thoughts of death, that, immediately repenting, he took a vomit to throw it up again, and gave freedom to his physician for having, with great prudence and wisdom, given him only a gentle dose of the poison. When Cneius Pompey was consulting with his friends in what manner he should conduct himself towards those who were neuter and took no part in the contest, he was the only one who proposed that they should be treated as enemies.

III. He left a son, who was, without doubt, the best of the family. By the Pedian law, he was condemned, although innocent, amongst others who were concerned in the death of Caesar . Upon this, he went over to Brutus and Cassius, his near relations; and, after their death, not only kept together the fleet, the command of which had been given him some time before, but even increased it. At last, when the party had everywhere been defeated, he voluntarily surrendered it to Mark Antony; considering it as a piece of service for which the latter owed him no small obligations. Of all those who were condemned by the law above-mentioned, he was the only man who was restored to his country, and filled the highest offices. When the civil war again broke out, he was appointed lieutenant under the same Antony, and offered the chief command by those who were ashamed of Cleopatra; but not daring, on account of a sudden indisposition with which he was seized, either to accept or refuse it, he went over to Augustus , and died a few days after, not without an aspersion cast upon his memory. For Antony gave out, that he was induced to change sides by his impatience to be with his mistress, Servilia Nais.

IV. This Cneius had a son, named Domitius, who was afterwards well known as the nominal purchaser of the family property left by Augustus’s will ; and no less famous in his youth for his dexterity in chariot-driving, than he was afterwards for the triumphal ornaments which he obtained in the German war. But he was a man of great arrogance, prodigality, and cruelty. When he was aedile, he obliged Lucius Plancus, the censor, to give him the way; and in his praetorship, and consulship, he made Roman knights and married women act on the stage. He gave hunts of wild beasts, both in the Circus and in all the wards of the city; as also a show of gladiators; but with such barbarity, that Augustus, after privately reprimanding him, to no purpose, was obliged to restrain him by a public edict.

V. By the elder Antonia he had Nero’s father, a man of execrable character in every part of his life. During his attendance upon Caius Caesar in the East, he killed a freedman of his own, for refusing to drink as much as he ordered him. Being dismissed for this from Caesar’s society, he did not mend his habits; for, in a village upon the Appian road, he suddenly whipped his horses, and drove his chariot, on purpose, over a poor boy, crushing him to pieces. At Rome, he struck out the

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1