British Intelligence Operations As They Relate To Britain's Defeat At Yorktown, 1781
()
About this ebook
Major Scott E. Conley
See Book Description
Related to British Intelligence Operations As They Relate To Britain's Defeat At Yorktown, 1781
Related ebooks
George Washington, America's First Director Of Military Intelligence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Making of Elizabethan Foreign Policy, 1558-1603 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gale Researcher Guide for: Spies in the American Revolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Great Democracies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lieutenant General Sir Samuel Auchmuty, 1756–1822: The Military Life of an American Loyalist and Imperial General Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMyth and Reality In Late Eighteenth Century British Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Atlantic Monthly, Volume 11, No. 64, February, 1863 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWinston Churchill: by History-Episode - A Fascinating Biography of a British Prime Minister That Led Britain Through World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Murder of Prime Minister Spencer Perceval: A Portrait of the Assassin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLord Esher: A Political Biography Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe History of the Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe British Soldier in America: A Social History of Military Life in the Revolutionary Period Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTo The Call of Bugles: A History of the Percy Tenantry Volunteers 1798–1814 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLoyalists and Redcoats: A Study in British Revolutionary Policy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreat Britain and Prussia in the 18th Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Central Intelligence Agency: History and Documents Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn the Shadows: The extraordinary men and women of the Intelligence Corps Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Ethnic Cleansing of the English Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNeutral Rights and Obligations in the Anglo-Boer War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGeorge III: King and politicians 1760–1770 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNine Years' War (1688-1697) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElizabeth I: War and Politics, 1588-1603 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Summary of Graham Allison's Destined For War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew England and the Bavarian Illuminati Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fifty Things You Need To Know About British History Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The History of Mi6: The Intelligence and Espionage Agency of the British Government Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow the Army Made Britain a Global Power, 1688–1815 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFailure Of British Strategy During The Southern Campaign Of The American Revolutionary War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsForgotten Warriors- Forgotten Battles: The Thirteen Revolutionary militias and their Indispensable Role Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Wars & Military For You
The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Doctors From Hell: The Horrific Account of Nazi Experiments on Humans Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unacknowledged: An Expose of the World's Greatest Secret Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Churchill's Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare: The Mavericks Who Plotted Hitler's Defeat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Idaho Falls: The Untold Story of America's First Nuclear Accident Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hitler's Monsters: A Supernatural History of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5About Face: The Odyssey of an American Warrior Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wager Disaster: Mayem, Mutiny and Murder in the South Seas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Forgotten Highlander: An Incredible WWII Story of Survival in the Pacific Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/577 Days of February: Living and Dying in Ukraine, Told by the Nation’s Own Journalists Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for British Intelligence Operations As They Relate To Britain's Defeat At Yorktown, 1781
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
British Intelligence Operations As They Relate To Britain's Defeat At Yorktown, 1781 - Major Scott E. Conley
This edition is published by PICKLE PARTNERS PUBLISHING—www.picklepartnerspublishing.com
To join our mailing list for new titles or for issues with our books – picklepublishing@gmail.com
Or on Facebook
Text originally published in 2010 under the same title.
© Pickle Partners Publishing 2014, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.
Publisher’s Note
Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.
We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.
BRITISH INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS AS THEY RELATE TO BRITAIN’S DEFEAT AT YORKTOWN, 1781
BY
MAJ SCOTT E. CONLEY.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS 4
ABSTRACT 5
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 6
CHAPTER 1 — INTRODUCTION 7
CHAPTER 2 — FRENCH INTERVENTION 14
CHAPTER 3 — BRITISH INTELLIGENCE AND THE DECISION TO MOVE THE WAR TO THE SOUTHERN COLONIES 26
CHAPTER 4 — THE ROAD TO YORKTOWN 35
CHAPTER 5 — CONCLUSIONS 52
ILLUSTRATION 55
ROUTES OF THE COMBATANTS IN 1781 55
REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER 56
BIBLIOGRAPHY LIST 57
Primary Sources 57
Articles 57
Books 59
ABSTRACT
This paper examines the role of British intelligence operations during the American Revolutionary War as they apply to the British defeat at Yorktown. It begins with a brief history of British intelligence prior to the war, discusses strategic collection against the burgeoning French-American alliance, examines preconceptions during the planning of the southern campaign, and analyses the tactical intelligence operations of Lord Charles Cornwallis’ army from the British victory at Charleston in 1780, through the defeat at Yorktown in 1781. It concludes that at the strategic level British intelligence accurately monitored French assistance to the Americans but had difficulty using the information to effect meaningful action on the American continent. At the operational level, General Sir Henry Clinton developed an accurate, reliable intelligence system in the northern colonies but was unable to transfer those successes to the southern theater. At the tactical level, General Cornwallis suffered from initial misconception about the degree of loyalist support in the South, lacked a general knowledge of the physical terrain in the southern colonies and failed to conduct proactive, deep reconnaissance during operations.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank the members of my committee for their direction and encouragement. Dr. Joseph Fischer’s knowledge, perspective, and patience as the committee chairman were critical to the success of this effort. Dr. Mark Gerges provided outstanding advice and editing, and forced me to take a hard look at sourcing throughout the process. Mr. David Pierson provided valuable guidance from the perspective of intelligence professional. I am deeply grateful for the time and effort these scholars devoted to this project. I would also like to thank Mrs. Venita Kruger, Education Technician, for her technical expertise, and kindness.
Finally, a special note to my closet editor, Ms. Jane Smith. Your experience, unbiased eye, and loving encouragement were a constant source of strength throughout this process. Thanks Mom.
CHAPTER 1 — INTRODUCTION
On 17 October 1777, British General John Burgoyne surrendered the remnants of his command to General Horatio Gates following the Battles of Saratoga, New York.{1} Britain’s last attempt to sever the patriot hotbed of New England from the rest of the colonies marked the first defeat and surrender of a significant British force since the American Revolution began and effectively ended major British offensive operations in the northern colonies. Henceforth, the British shifted their attention to the south, believing an outpouring of Loyalist support would reinvigorate the war effort and overextend George Washington’s relatively meager army in the North. Four years later to the day, another celebrated British commander would surrender a second major army, ending Britain’s attempts to subjugate the American south and effectively retain her colonies in America. This thesis will investigate British intelligence operations during the time period between these two events to discover what intelligence factors, at the strategic, operational, and tactical levels, led to the defeat of the last significant British fighting force in the American colonies. It seems impossible that the preeminent army in the world could commit such a grievous error and effectively sacrifice its last chance of success in retaining one of its most important colonies given timely and accurate intelligence. After an examination of the evidence, however, and given the limitations of the time period, British intelligence appears to have done a good job deciphering the enemy’s actions throughout the campaign. Though there were still weaknesses in the analysis of the facts at hand, the defeat at Yorktown cannot be attributed to a lack of intelligence, but a lack of political will and unity of command, a failure to understand the conflict they were fighting, and a changing global situation which the British were unprepared to oppose. In order to understand the dynamics of intelligence operations during the American Revolution it is important to first understand the history and functionality of British intelligence, as well as the state of it at the outset of the war.
Unlike many modern governments, English, and later British monarchs did not inherit an established intelligence system loyal to the country and monarchy. Instead, intelligence operations were generally rooted in personal relationships between agents and a specific ruler and when the ruler died or fell out of favor, the system collapsed. As such, the development of British intelligence as an independent entity was a long, inconsistent process, and to isolate a specific date for its creation is impossible. Nevertheless, to understand the situation King George III inherited in 1760 it is critical to understand British intelligence theory and practice in the preceding centuries.
Across Europe, intelligence activities at the national level developed first during the middle-ages in diplomatic circles, with espionage being one of the fundamental duties of ambassadors and envoys. As Richard Deacon puts it, Diplomacy and theft were almost synonymous.
{2} Modern diplomacy dates back to thirteenth-century Venice and the Venetians were particularly adept at employing their representatives as information collectors. The English, however, took some time to realize the importance of these activities and spent most of these early years as victims rather that practitioners of the art. Although they eventually caught on, their efforts varied widely in effectiveness, as did the attention and finances paid to them in subsequent centuries.{3}
The first monarch known to place a heavy emphasis on espionage was Henry VII, who in the latter fifteenth century employed agents to track the activities of his enemies both domestically and abroad. In the years before he took the throne it was only through the skilled employment of personal agents Henry avoided being killed or captured by his rival, Richard III. During his reign, he remained vigilant and kept to a small group of trusted advisors for security and information. Henry’s system,
however, was much more a personal spy ring than a national asset and his chief agent, Christopher Urswick, Recorder of London, did not direct intelligence operations for the king.{4}
His son and successor Henry VIII was