Kesselring: An Analysis of The German Commander at Anzio
()
About this ebook
The investigation reveals that Kesselring, the Army Group Commander, made a proper and effective decision in committing the Army Group reserves to the German defensive line prior to the invasion, and that his involvement in the development and execution of the German counterattack at Anzio was doctrinally sound and generally effective.
Captain Teddy Bitner
See Book Description
Related to Kesselring
Related ebooks
The Great Escape: An Analysis Of Allied Actions Leading To The Axis Evacuation Of Sicily In World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnzio (Operation Shingle): An Operational Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCalculated Risk: Military Theory And The Allies Campaign In Italy, 1943-1944 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFlawed Commanders and Strategy in the Battles for Italy, 1943–45 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnzio Nettuno: A Battle of Leadership Mistakes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRetreat through the Rhone Valley: Defensive battles of the Nineteenth Army, August–September 1944 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRome to the Po River: The 362nd Infantry Division, 1944–45 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEisenhower’s Six Great Decisions: Europe, 1944–1945 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The War in Italy, 1943–1944 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Operation Crusader: Tank Warfare in the Desert, Tobruk 1941 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Battle for Italy: One of the Second World War's Most Brutal Campaigns Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRommel & Caporetto Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5March On Paris And The Battle Of The Marne 1914 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLeningrad: The Advance of Panzer Group 4, 1941 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBolt Action: Campaign: Italy: Soft Underbelly Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe 101st Airborne Division’s Defense Of Bastogne [Illustrated Edition] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Salerno To Rome: General Mark W. Clark And The Challenges Of Coalition Warfare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClausewitz And Torgau: Link-Up On The Elbe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The German Air Force versus Russia, 1941 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKursk: A Study In Operational Art Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Operation Sealion: The Invasion of England 1940 Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Armoured Warfare in the Italian Campaign, 1943–1945 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The German Air Force versus Russia, 1943 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTobruk 1941: Capture, Siege, Relief Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Zitadelle: The German Offensive Against the Kursk Salient 4-17 July 1943 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The German Army Handbook of 1918 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blitzkrieg: From the Ground Up Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Panther German Army Medium Tank: Italian Front, 1944–1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHell in the Trenches: Austro-Hungarian Stormtroopers and Italian Arditi in the Great War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Wars & Military For You
Churchill's Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare: The Mavericks Who Plotted Hitler's Defeat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Hitler's Monsters: A Supernatural History of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unacknowledged: An Expose of the World's Greatest Secret Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Doctors From Hell: The Horrific Account of Nazi Experiments on Humans Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Idaho Falls: The Untold Story of America's First Nuclear Accident Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5About Face: The Odyssey of an American Warrior Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wager Disaster: Mayem, Mutiny and Murder in the South Seas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Plane in the Sky: An Oral History of 9/11 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Forgotten Highlander: An Incredible WWII Story of Survival in the Pacific Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Kesselring
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Kesselring - Captain Teddy Bitner
This edition is published by PICKLE PARTNERS PUBLISHING—www.picklepartnerspublishing.com
To join our mailing list for new titles or for issues with our books –
Or on Facebook
Text originally published in 1956 under the same title.
© Pickle Partners Publishing 2013, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.
Publisher’s Note
Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.
We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.
KESSELRING: AN ANALYSIS OF THE GERMAN COMMANDER AT ANZIO
by Captain Teddy D. Bitner
This study attempts to analyze the decisions made by Field Marshal Albert Kesselring prior to and during the battle of Anzio in February 1944. The focus of the investigation is on Kesselring’s decision to shift Army Group reserves from the Rome area prior to the Allied amphibious assault at Anzio on 18 January 1944, then his involvement in the development and execution of the German counterattack against the Allied beachhead conducted on 16 February 1944.
The investigation reveals that Kesselring, the Army Group Commander, made a proper and effective decision in committing the Army Group reserves to the German defensive line prior to the invasion, and that his involvement in the development and execution of the German counterattack at Anzio was doctrinally sound and generally effective.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS 4
CHAPTER ONE. INTRODUCTION 6
Purpose 6
Need 7
Method 7
Preview 8
CHAPTER TWO. BACKGROUND 9
Background: Albert Kesselring 9
Background: The Defense of Italy 15
Background: The Nature of the Peninsular Defense 18
Background: Kesselring the Personality 21
CHAPTER THREE. KESSELRING'S DECISIONS AT ANZIO 23
Situation: 31 December 1943 23
The Establishment of German Reserve Forces 26
Decision Point: The Commitment of the Strategic Reserves 27
Allied Decision for Anzio 29
Operations in the Defensive System 30
Commitment of the Reserves 31
The Invasion and Reaction 33
Events Leading to the Counterattack 34
Planning for the Counterattack 35
Hitler's Restrictions on the Counterattack 37
The Counterattack 37
Conclusion 39
CHAPTER FOUR. ANALYSIS OF KESSELRING'S DECISIONS AT ANZIO 40
Commitment of the Army Group Reserves 40
Information Available to Kesselring 40
Prediction of the Landing in Mid-February 42
Commitment of the Reserves 43
The Logic of Commitment 44
The Research Questions 44
The Counterattack 45
Development of the Counterattack Plan 45
Attempt to Modify the Restrictions 46
The Conduct of the Counterattack 47
The Research Questions 47
Conclusion 48
CHAPTER FIVE, CONCLUSION 49
Commitment of the Reserves 49
The Counterattack Plan 51
Albert Kesselring: The Commander 53
Recommendations for Further Research 54
Final Remark 54
APPENDIX A 55
APPENDIX B 56
APPENDIX C 57
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY 58
BOOKS: 58
GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS: 60
OTHER GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS: 61
GOVERNMENT HISTORICAL STUDIES: 62
MAGAZINE ARTICLES: 62
REQUEST FROM THE PUBLISHER 63
CHAPTER ONE. INTRODUCTION
On 21 November 1943, the German High Command appointed Luftwaffe Field Marshal Albert Kesselring to the position of Commander in Chief, Southwest and Commander, Army Group C. Hitler's decision to give this job to Kesselring was the culmination of a historic debate between Kesselring and Field Marshal Erwin Rommel, who shared a divided command in Italy, about how best to defend the Italian peninsula. The divergent proposals for the conduct of the war in Italy, as solicited by Hitler, represented the strategic and operational concepts of the two Field Marshals. When Hitler finally made his decision about who was to command the theater, Rommel was transferred to prepare for the inevitable Allied landing in the West, leaving Kesselring to put his ideas into reality.
The job in which Kesselring found himself in November 1943 was really not new, but a continuation of his responsibilities since his appointment as Commander in Chief, South, in November 1941. At that time, he was given the responsibility to supply Rommel in North Africa. Later, in October 1942, he was made responsible for the defense of all German occupied Mediterranean areas except those under the control of Rommel. Because of his experience, Kesselring was intimately familiar with the situation in Italy and had extensive working relationships with his Italian counterparts. It would seem, on the surface, that such an assignment would not be unusual for a Field Marshal. Yet, in this case, there were at least three unusual aspects to Kesselring's job.
First, Kesselring was responsible for all German forces in his area of operations. When earlier appointed Commander in Chief, South, he had also been given responsibility for all German forces, thus organizing the only command outside of the German High Command (OKW) which controlled forces from all three services. Secondly, Kesselring was an Air Force officer. Aviators like Kesselring were not given long term ground assignments, and no other senior Luftwaffe officer was placed in the position of a theater command. In this sense, Kesselring's position was especially unique. Finally, during the months prior to his appointment, Kesselring was not primarily responsible for the defense of the Italian peninsula, the Italian High Command had that responsibility. Kesselring operated on a coordinate level with the Italian High Command, being directly responsible for the conduct of coalition warfare with the major German ally in the European theater until their capitulation to the Allies in September 1943.
Kesselring was therefore, a man in a highly responsible and unique position within the German command structure. Despite this uniqueness, there is currently very little material published concerning Kesselring as a commander. Aside from his own memoirs, a biography and a magazine article, Kesselring is mentioned in published material only incidentally to specific combat actions or decisions, biographies of other leaders, or discussed in relation to larger force developments during the inter-war years. Additionally, there are postwar historical documents prepared by German officers under the supervision of military historians, a significant portion of which was prepared by Kesselring himself, which relate to his operations, but are not synthesized in any way. Our failure to carefully analyze Kesselring's situation and approach to command, particularly in the area of decision making, leaves a considerable gap in our historical knowledge of the campaign in Italy from the German perspective.
Purpose
The purpose of this thesis is to provide an analysis of Field Marshal Albert Kesselring's decisions as the Axis theater commander in control of German forces at the battle of Anzio, January-February 1944, specifically, his decisions regarding the commitment of his Army Group reserves to the Gustav Line on 18 January 1944 and the development and implementation of the counterattack plan which led to the German counterattack of the Allied beachhead at Anzio beginning 16 February 1944. As an introduction to a wider study of Kesselring as a commander, this evaluation is intended to focus on a single, well definable crisis faced by Kesselring during the defense of Italy, thus providing a vehicle for evaluation. This paper will not provide an in depth evaluation of the battle of Anzio.
Anzio, a coastal town on the Tyrrhenian Sea, south of Rome, was the scene of 9 major amphibious assault by the VI Corps of the Fifth (US) Army in late January 1944. The resulting series of battles, fought in late January through May, were a desperate struggle for control of the beachhead and the routes leading from it. The Allies intended to outflank German defenses of the Gustav Line located further south, and open the way to Rome. The Germans sought to contain and destroy the Allied forces in the beachhead while preventing breakthrough along the Gustav Line. For Kesselring, this crisis meant that he had to balance forces and threats between the beachhead and the line further south, in order to achieve his objectives at both locations with his carefully husbanded resources. Consequently, Anzio can be viewed as a single, important crisis in the context of the larger defensive consideration, and an opportunity to examine Kesselring's decisions within that larger framework.
Need
As stated earlier, there is currently no definitive evaluation of Kesselring as a commander. This lack points to a need to evaluate the conduct of the Italian campaign from