Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Boxer, Beetle: A Novel
Boxer, Beetle: A Novel
Boxer, Beetle: A Novel
Ebook290 pages4 hours

Boxer, Beetle: A Novel

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

From the "effervescent" (Washington Post) author of Madness is Better than Defeat and The Teleportation Accident, a rollicking novel about fascism, boxing, entomology, eugenics, and desire.

Kevin "Fishy" Broom has his nickname for a reason: he has a rare genetic condition that makes him smell markedly like rotting fish. Consequently, he rarely ventures out of the London apartment where he deals online in Nazi memorabilia. But when Fishy stumbles upon a crime scene, he finds himself on the long-cold trail of a pair of small-time players in interwar British history. First, there's Philip Erskine, a fascist gentleman entomologist who dreams of breeding an indomitable beetle as tribute to Reich Chancellor Hitler's glory, all the while aspiring to arguably more sinister projects in human eugenics. And then there's Seth "Sinner" Roach, a homosexual Jewish boxer, nine-toed, runtish, brutish--but perfect in his way--who becomes an object of obsession for Erskine, professionally and most decidedly otherwise. What became of the boxer? What became of the beetle? And what will become of anyone who dares to unearth the answers?

Ned Beauman spins out a dazzling narrative across decades and continents, weaving his manic fiction through the back alleys of history. Boxer, Beetle is a remarkably assured, wildly enjoyable debut.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateSep 13, 2011
ISBN9781608197316
Boxer, Beetle: A Novel
Author

Ned Beauman

Ned Beauman was born in 1985 and studied philosophy at Cambridge University. He has written for Dazed & Confused, AnOther Magazine, the Guardian, the Financial Times, and several other magazines and newspapers. He lives in London and is is at work on his second novel. Visit www.boxerbeetle.com.

Read more from Ned Beauman

Related to Boxer, Beetle

Related ebooks

Literary Fiction For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Boxer, Beetle

Rating: 3.4931507260273977 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

146 ratings27 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Rating: 4.25* of fiveThe Publisher Says: Kevin "Fishy" Broom has his nickname for a reason-a rare genetic condition that makes his sweat and other bodily excretions smell markedly like rotting fish. Consequently, he rarely ventures out of the London apartment where he deals online in Nazi memorabilia. But when Fishy stumbles upon a crime scene, he finds himself on the long-cold trail of a pair of small-time players in interwar British history. First, there's Philip Erskine, a fascist gentleman entomologist who dreams of breeding an indomitable beetle as tribute to Reich Chancellor Hitler's glory, all the while aspiring to arguably more sinister projects in human eugenics. And then there's Seth "Sinner" Roach, a homosexual Jewish boxer, nine-toed, runtish, brutish-but perfect in his way-who becomes an object of obsession for Erskine, professionally and most decidedly otherwise. What became of the boxer? What became of the beetle? And what will become of anyone who dares to unearth the answers?First-time novelist Ned Beauman spins out a dazzling narrative across decades and continents, weaving his manic fiction through the back alleys of history. Boxer, Beetle is a remarkably assured, wildly enjoyable debut.My Review: Pawn Stars meets Queer as Folk, directed by Leni Riefenstahl and produced by Russell T Davies.I read this after I'd gulped down The Teleportation Accident. Whatever Ned Beauman writes, he leavens with amusing dialogue and mildly incredible situations. I've heard his work characterized as science fiction. I think of that as a compliment, yet I'm not sure that label fits. It feels to me more as though Beauman has Anglicized the South American Magical Realism, shining the black light and the strobe light simultaneously on real situations, recognizable people, and commonplace locations, thereby revealing the bloodstains, the slug tracks, and the frightened faces of bystanders to the events unfurling before us.This strange tale of fascists obsessed with Jewish sex objects is made much more fun by the modern-day frame around it. The Nazi-memorabilia thread made the whole story come together, as there was no missing the echoes of the insanity of the 1930s in modern times.But to me the 4ft11in Sinner Roach (a piece of word-play that only makes sense in the book's context) steals the book. A boxer who makes more money from the men he fucks than he'd ever dreamed possible, goes to New York to fight the biggest fight of his career. If he can stay sober, he'll be in the big time. Well...Sinner is aptly named, let's say. His antics in New York and London are worth the book's cost. But the modern-day outcast, Sinner's echo, good-guy hacker/thief Fishy is just as amusing as he races around London in Sinner's long-ago wake to make his own big-time score. Where the two paths converge is a very moving moment. Considering Beauman's apparent dislike of sentimentality, it's also unusual.I can't help but complain about one thing: The Philip Erskine Malaise. As soon as he takes over the narrative, he leaches the fun and slows the pace from the narrative. His wishy-washy mealy-mouthed scaredy-cat snobbery made me cringe, roll my eyes, and snort impatiently. Hence the 3/4-star deduction from the rating. Because this started out as a 5-star read, and should have stayed one. Don't cheat yourself, though, get the book on your TBR hillock somewhere neat the top.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    It's too short to give the material proper treatment. The framing device of Kevin in modern day is almost unimportant.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Beauman's first novel is a great read. Lots of humour and a gripping story that never takes itself too seriously. Sort of like a Malcolm price detective time travelling novel with a bit of 19th century eugenics thrown in. Very satisfying. If you liked it then read his second.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A massive exploration into eugenics, Boxer, Beetle is ambitious. The two main characters are self-loathing bastards, though their self-destruction manifests itself in different ways. It's a man's world, so the only woman who comes close to being a main character is somehow more well-adjusted (perhaps because she is straight and the men are not straight.) The narrator doesn't seem to be a main character to me, because the book is strangely more about the past than the present. And the story in both the past and the present takes many twists and turns.

    What Beauman does well is the development of the neurotic male characters (Erskine and Broom) in the book. Their lives, their personal and social constraints, their worries, and their ambitions make them whole. What Beauman does too much of, for me, is the political blabber about the anti-Semitic, eugenics-centered arguments between politicians and intellectuals that go on and on and on for pages, where, yes, one would need to look up many events that happen or are referred to make sense of most of it. That's all fine; who doesn't like to work a little to learn some good history? (Uhm, some people don't, so this book is not recommended for those...) But somehow it was too much, too long, and at some point I found myself skimming through the anti-Semitic bullshit to get to the action or the personal developments. All of it reminded me of Rushdie's books where references to current affairs and historical events are a staple of every paragraph, but Beauman's prose does not flow as well or is not as captivating. There is also the added massive uncomfortable feeling of reading horrendously racist things being said that if you grew up in the West and are not a skinhead, you might find yourself cringing a lot. Of course, most of it is also hilarious. But not at all. But yes. But no. And it goes...

    As for the beetles... As someone who designs biological experiments to test hypotheses on a daily basis, I am not sure what the question is that is being asked by the experiments with the beetles in the book. That selective breeding can improve select traits? But that's not what Erskine's genius (eugenics) idea, that's only what agriculture and farming has been doing for centuries. Can we breed better stuff by combining those that have select good traits? Sure, but nowhere in the book do we learn that Erskine has done such experiments. What seems to happen int he book is that there are some beetles and by feeding them different stuff and/or over time, Erskine allows them to become super beetles... Uhm, OK... (Perhaps all this is to ridicule the "science" of eugenics?)

    In the end, I am glad I read this book and learned some stuff about fascism in Europe (Blackshirts, Battle of Cable Street, etc.) I am not sure if I would recommend to to anyone, other than those who really enjoy intellectual, historical, and rather uncomfortable subject matters.

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Nazis! Nazi memorabilia collectors! Boxers! Boxing promoters! Insects! Entomologists! Sufferers of trimethylaminuria! People who have to work with and smell them!The ecosystem of Ned Beauman's Boxer, Beetle is complicated and repulsive, but wound up not being quite as compelling as other reviewers have made it sound.

    The novel intertwines two narratives and two timelines in the now-classic format of a historical narrative being chased down by a modern explorer. In the 21st century, we have a young man named Fishy (so named for his unfortunate, genetically-determined body chemistry and the odors it produces), who conducts internet auctions of historical artifacts at his day job, and has a special sideline in the Nazi memorabilia trade for a hobby, and whose latest mysterious pursuit (alongside a nasty gun-toting freelancer who is killing his way to a new find) leads him to start exploring the story of a British entomologist, fascist and eugenics enthusiast and the diminutive Jewish boxer whom the entomologist manipulates into becoming the subject of some, err, special research in 1936.

    Trimethylaminuria is neither played up for laughs (something I was kind of expecting-with-a-cringe from the novel's earliest pages) nor presented as a subject for our compassion or pity (though in real life lots of sufferers wind up committing suicide as a result of the social isolation it tends to impose, the Gordon Crisps of the world aside) as it stands in, in the modern timeline, for all of the things about humanity eugenicists want to eliminate (in 1936, of course, they're much more blatant and reprehensible about it). For Fishy it's just a fact in his life, albeit one that has dealt him out of the reproductive sweepstakes far more effectively than anything the eugenicists of yesteryear would have dared to dream of. He's got bigger concerns as the novel unfolds, like surviving and escaping from his weird captor. Or so it would seem as the novel gets going, but then Fishy and the gunman disappear except for quick and pointless interludes. Fishy's disorder winds up being kind of a punchline for the novel, but otherwise, there really isn't much point to his being in it. Which is a shame.

    Meanwhile, Philip Erskine's story (1936) is a study in multiform ickiness, not because he specializes in carrion-eating/carnivorous insects, but because of his and his family's matter-of-fact fascism and anti-semetism and, while we're at it, classism. For Erskine is a character straight out of Michel Houellebecq, that French novelist I so love to hate and hate to love. Amid all of his other passions and pretenses are little observations like this one, made while he tries to address the difficult problem of how to masturbate when sharing a cabin and a bed with a professional colleague: "Why couldn't one just go to the doctor every month to have one's semen, this irrational fluid, syringed off like the pus from a boil."

    This long before he is shown regarding a semen sample demanded from his boxer specimen as "ootheca", a term usually reserved for the egg case of members of that insect family that contains mantises and cockroaches, thus demonstrating just how human he thinks Seth Roach isn't (and lest one think Roach is by any stretch of the imagination a sympathetic figure or victim, he's just biding his time until he can go out again and get rip-roaring drunk and beat the crap out of whatever "toff" is foolish enough to take him home. There's rough sex, and there's what Roach does. Yikes.).

    So, like Arslan before it in my reading this year, this is a fairly repellent and ugly book, but this time unredeemed by beautiful prose. Beauman takes great, gleeful pleasure in giving us a close look at some of the greatest ugliness humanity has ever produced, and at the people who allowed it to flourish largely because they were happy to admire it from a distance. Erskine, for instance, is, in addition to all the other icky things he is, such a fan of Adolf Hitler's that he goes so far as to breed a stronger, nastier, more belligerent strain of an eyeless beetle he originally discovered in a cave in the Poland the Fuhrer is soon to invade, all so that there might be an insect worthy of being named after his hero.

    And then there's the boxer, all four foot eleven of him, nine-toed Seth Roach, descended from immigrants chased away by pogroms from the environs of the cave where Erskine found his breeding stock, the kind of gay man who embraces the idea that his preferences are considered perversions and who not only lets himself get roped into being Erskine's study subject, but into coming along to a fateful conference that is supposed to be about artificial languages (think Esperanto, only weirder and more fiddly) but winds up being something rather more vile.

    But hey, sometimes, at least, Boxer, Beetle is funny, as when we come, midway through the book, to a description of Erskine's ancestral home, which his father had determined to modernize so thoroughly that it would still be modern in a hundred years. Rube Goldberg isn't in it. I could have maybe used more of this kind of thing for my tour through the slime -- especially in a novel that is promoted as "hilarious." Had I been looking for belly laughs instead of bugs, I might have been annoyed at the paucity of the former (as it was, I could have used more of the latter, but that's what Daniel Evan Weiss' debut was for. And Tyler Knox's for that matter). As it stands, well, this is the first novel of a young man of undoubted talent but who maybe bit off a bit much for his first project. His second, The Teleportation Accident, was long-listed for the Man Booker this year, and sounds interesting enough for me to give it another chance, but on the strength of the subject matter more than of his writing as I've seen it so far.

    Anyway, it doesn't sound like it's quite as filthy.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This is a review of a free book I received via the Goodreads First Reads program. It took forever for the book to be delivered to me, longer than usual for me to finish, and even longer for me to get around to a review attempt. Oops!

    First off, this is not a book for the easily offended. Sure boxers and beetles sound innocuous enough, but then there's all the antisemitism, sex and violence in between. The characters are pretty despicable people too. And yet...I liked it. There's something about Ned Beauman's style that makes me want to give him another go. I'm just hoping that if I do cross paths with this author again, it will be with a book that has characters I can actually root for.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    What on earth to say about this book? Essentially, it's about the wrong-headedness of trying to impose order on a beautifully chaotic world. As you might guess from a book on this theme, it's rather chaotic itself, although perhaps not beautifully so, as it delights in being shocking.So, we have a cast of assorted doctrinaire crazies; designers of languages which will be more logical than the ones we have, architects who are led by their theories to build buildings that human beings can't live in, Nazis. Yes. You might think that there are other things to say about the Holocaust than that it was impractical. But then, I said this book delighted in being shocking.It also has a cast of really quite unpleasant characters - although this didn't diminish my enjoyment, either of the chaos or of the sardonically funny writing. "We had been driving west on the M3, past great drizzly industrial estates where men in overalls tended economies of scale like oxpeckers on a rhino".What this book reminded me of most was a slightly toned-down Will Self. I like Self in small doses, so that suited me pretty well. But don't expect it to make too much sense.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I tried SO hard to like this book, but I just could not get into it. Was that because one of the main characters was an upper-class A-hole entomologist with racist leanings? Or was it the back and forth between different timelines, and a group of equally unappealing characters? I don't know, but I had to force myself to read it.Parts of this book are quite funny, and literally laugh out loud. Mostly, though, I found it just too grim and depressing. Nazis and the freaks that collect their leavings are not interesting to me; nor are small feisty Jewish boxers. Even with beetles.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I enjoyed this book immensely. Things I like about it:-The way that everything about it is new, fresh, and original. The characters, the plot, the way it unfolds, everything is interesting.-The dialogue is witty and concise. The descriptive writing is clever and subtly humorous.-The shocking, grotesque, and "naughty" elements in the plot that keep it unexpected and engaging. I've long believed that some of the best reading happens when there is an element of the forbidden involved.The only times that I found my interest flagging were during some of the political bits about the war situation, etc., but I don't think it was unneccessary. On the whole, I feel that this book is a rousing success, and I agree with all of the blurbs on the jacket, especially the one from Time Out:"Witty, erudite...articulate and original...often gobsmackingly smutty."
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I liked Ned Beauman's Boxer, Beetle: A Novel well enough as an interesting, challenging little book, most enjoyable when viewed as an elaborate set-piece. On the other hand, readers looking for depth and insight, or high comedy, might best look elsewhere.Beauman's Work begins with an extended, detailed construct of a plot: alternating between the present (early 21st Century) and past, Kevin, a small-time, contemporary collector of Nazi memorabilia, stumbles on a secret history of events in England during the years of Hitler's rise to power in Germany. Erskine, the pseudo-scientist son of a minor British nobleman, occupies himself in 1930s London (possibly hiding from an eccentric father and family back at the ancestral estate) with his "work" in genetics and eugenics, as expressed in a robust, vicious species of previously unidentified beetle, cruising homosexual clubs of London by night. Early in the novel, Erskine happens on a prize-fight, during which he becomes obsessed with one particular boxer -- Seth Roach, a diminutive, deformed Jew, alcoholic and homosexual himself, who remarkably prevails to win his fights. To Erskine's mind, Roach is a human specimen of eugenic "principles" in action -- inherently weak and despicable, yet possessed of extraordinary, innate ability and strength that help him thrive. Thereafter, the novel moves ahead in rather systematic progression, detailing successive plot events as they unfold.Unfortunately, with little direction or purpose save the plot itself, Boxer, Beetle boils down to not much (if anything) more than light entertainment. The characters -- Erskine, Roach, and others -- are moderately engaging but shallow stereotypes (the Eccentric Father, the Fascist Neighbor, the Nymphomaniac Sister, the Maid, the Butler, etc.), each limited by his or her place in the story and what will advance its telling. Plot developments that should be compelling -- Erskine's scientific "discoveries," Roach's degeneracy and decline, even the ultimately defining moment of their relationship -- are simply mechanical components, leading to resolution (such as it is) when the secrets of history break in on Kevin's (remember him?) present day.There is humor, intelligence and wit in the telling, particularly in a dark and scatological vein; but the cover copy come-ons -- "Terrific," "Gripping," "Hilarious," "Exhilarating," etc. -- plainly oversell the Work, thereby doing both Beauman and the novel a disservice. The problem is more than simple differences between British and American humor; the publisher promises a Tom-Sharpe-style farce, but Beauman is about something else entirely. For Beauman's sake, I hope his next effort (The Teleportation Accident, apparently due in late 2012 or 2013) demonstrates the growth and promise we would look for in a young writer. Otherwise, I'd be slow to expect anything much more or different from a third book to follow two years on.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is an extremely interesting premise. It's a mystery where the detective suffers from severe body odor. And when I say severe, I do mean severe. It was a hard premise to get into at first, fortunately the extremely good writing made it a lot easier. A very interesting read. Strongly recommended for those looking for a twist on the deceptive genre
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I now have finally found the time to read this book. I found myself laughing out loud more than once. Book was enjoyable, and fast paced. I have passed the book on to a friend.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This genre-bending, unique novel is difficult to describe. There's a mystery plot, a collector of Nazi memorabilia, a eugenics doctor, insects, and the list goes on. I highly recommend reading this with friends or family so you can have someone to discuss the novel with (though you might not want to discuss those sex scenes!). I also enjoyed the abundant humor. Overall, this novel was more weird than wonderful, but I applaud its originality.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This book is an intriguing mix of past and present. There's a contemporary murder mystery plot that intertwines with the story of a collector of Nazi memorabilia and the period between the World Wars. This novel is entertaining and funny and also unique and a bit weird. Read this if you're looking for something different.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Not for the faint of heart - this tale is a combination of Evelyn Waugh's bitter English satire and Pynchonesque conspiracy metafiction with a dash of hard boiled noir. Only funnier and more pornographic. Nazis, bugs, buggery, and 1930's London class warfare.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Enjoyable, mischievious page turner - reminiscent of Conan Doyle. Comes to a rather contrived conclusion unfortunately.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Boxer Beetle follows to parallel stories, separated only by several decades. One is the story of a Jewish boxer in 1930s England who is being studied by entomologist-turned-eugenics doctor by the name of Erskine. A mystery surrounding the two is discovered by present day Kevin, a collector of Nazi Memorabilia. Kevin finds himself in trouble after his patron is killed and he is forced to search for the only bit of legacy left behind by the fascist-obsessed eugenics doctor. The book is an interesting fictionalization of Nazi ideology over time and eugenics. The characters are riveting if not always likable, although the details of the story can be a bit overwhelming.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I'm sorry to say that I didn't get this one. I did laugh in a few places, but I guess I'm not political enough to get the humor that is claimed on the cover.The narrative jumps between current times and the 1930s. We meet Kevin Brown, an internet trader who goes to auction sites to buy and sell Nazi memorabilia. Then we meet Seth "Sinner' Roach and Dr. Erkskine back in 1934. The doctor and Sinner have a strange arrangement where Sinner allows the doctor to study him for science. He had been doing these eugenics studies on beetles but wanted to move on to humans and chose Sinner.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I received Boxer Beetle as part of the Early Reviewers program. I was eager to dive in based on the description - combining historical fiction with science is right up my alley. But Beauman fell short for me here. The characters didn't seem fully developed, sure they were described well but they seemed to lack whatever it is that makes me truly care about fictional characters. The two timelines were interwoven nicely even if both could have been expanded a bit. Also, what was with all of the in your face gay sex? It seemed like Beauman went out of his way to make it known that several of the characters were gay and horny, neither of which added to the plot in any significant manner. I will say that I enjoyed the beetle aspect of the story line and would have liked a little more on that. The beetles after breeding by Erskine were certainly horrific and the scenes involving them were done well- made me squirm! I really wish I liked this book more than I did. I'll be interested in seeing future reviews and will keep Ned Beauman on my radar and consider reading future works.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    So the first thing you need to know about this book is that the writing is really great. Beauman puts together great sentences, and although I'm not going to be able to finish the book, I'm the subject matter (broadly eugenics and the Nazis, more specifically, entomology, Nazi memorabilia, and the psychology, or perhaps the pathology, if you will, of sex) is definitely interesting. In other words, the plot definitely pulled me in.There's a lot of violence in here, though, a lot of gross, gory violence, eloquently described but perpetrated against small animals and the otherwise sort of helpless, and I just can't do it, even though this is an Early Reviewer book. I looked back at the description, and I don't think it was misleading, but I wasn't prepared for the level of violence and the detail in which it is described, and I wouldn't have requested the book if I'd realized how important that would be to the plot. It's not on every page, but there's enough that it's too much for me. Your mileage, of course, may vary.The writing is really excellent, so I'm sad to have to put this down, but I won't sleep, I know, if I try to finish it. This isn't a book for me, but I tend to be a little more upset by this kind of thing than average, I think, and so I don't mean to dis-recommend the book, just to offer a warning about what you will find in it.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This is an intersing study in fiction of eugenics wrapped in chronological mystery. "The story centers around Philip Erskine, a young entomologist and Nazi sympathizer in 1936. He becomes obsessed with a Jewish boxer, Seth Roach. The novel actually opens in modern-day London, with a murder and a number of Nazi memorabilia collectors," writes syntheticvox. I aggree with that brief summary. The language and tone of the book are rather academic which is a striking contast to the base and emotionally honest dialogue and emotion expressed by the characters. The authors handles the chronoglocail shifts well and each character is larger than the description on the page. There are not sympathic characters in the book nor are there meant to be. Each character is a unique clash of opposite traits which only causes further conflict when confronted in groups of characters. The plot and writing do feel a bit two dimensional at times but the author is to be commeneded for interweaving so many character traits while using such a light touch. A nice film of dark comedy wraps the whole of the book. A strong effort that inidcates the rawness of the author is backed with plenty of talent.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I found this book rather disappointing. It has already been released in the UK to (what seems to be) great reviews. Nevertheless, I had difficulty finishing the short novel. The story centers around Philip Erskine, a young entomologist and Nazi sympathizer in 1936. He becomes obsessed with a Jewish boxer, Seth Roach. The novel actually opens in modern-day London, with a murder and a number of Nazi memorabilia collectors. It isn't well into the novel that we understand why the two are connected. The characters, save for Sinner Roach, are completely unsympathetic, including the modern-day protagonist, Kevin, Inexplicably, he has a terrible smelling disease, trimethylaminuria. I have no idea why that was even added, nor do I care. The final third of the book picked up pace and interest, but by that time, I really hadn't gained any interest in Erskine. There were several tangents (Erskine's grandfather's obsession with creating a global language, for example) that added nothing to the book. Further, the "twists" (such as they were) were so late in the making that they didn't have any impact.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Part Chuck Palahniuk novel, part surreal historical fiction, Boxer, Beetle: A Novel by Ned Beauman, tells two different stories from two different times. The main character, Fishy, an odd sort of person who collects Nazi memorabilia, finds himself in the middle of a murder mystery that dates back to World War II. While this is not usually the type of book I pick up to read, it was fast and enjoyable and just a bit weird.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A likeable book, even if a crucial character (our titular boxer) is one of the most relentlessly unlikeable people I can recall reading about. Clever, charming, strange, funny and dark. What more can you want from a first novel - or any novel, for that matter?
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A strange little book, two stories, two different timelines, connected by coincidence: one story tells of Fishy, named so because of his affliction, trimethylaminuria, which makes him stink of fish. He finds Nazi memorabilia for paying costumers. One day he stumbles across a dead body and in the flat of said corpse he finds a letter from Adolf Hitler to a Doctor Erskine. The second story is the story of Erskine and a Jewish boxer - and slowly those two stories connect. The prose is easy to read, but not simple, and the story grabs you and draws you into the strange world we are offered here.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Too much unnecessary swearing and descriptions of buggery, barely redeemed by a half-decent ending.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Boxer, Beetle is wonderfully written. Funny, raw and true to its mark, every sentence and phrase is jewel-like but not at all precious. The humor is dark and deadly. Grit underfoot and the taste of blood...rusty barbed wire and macabre death.The novel begins in the present day with Kevin “Fishy” Broom who suffers from trimethylaminuria, a rare condition that leaves him smelling horribly like rotting fish! He collects and deals in Nazi memorabilia. Fishy is a strangely likeable character. Working for wealthy property developer Grublock, who also collects Nazi memorabilia, he is sent to check up on a private investigator. Finding him dead, he also finds a note to someone called Dr. Erskine from Adolf Hitler. When Grublock is murdered, the novel turns into a tense fast-paced thriller as Fishy attempts to find out the connection between the entomologist Erskine, the jewish boxer “Sinner” Roach and whoever is on his trail and killing people. The novel alternates between the quest in the present day and, more often, chapters set in the 30s as the events take place.The characters are not likeable but you like them anyway. Seth “Sinner” Rauch, a jewish boxer in 1930s London is despicably heartwarming. Dr. Erskine the eugenics-obsessed entomologist is driven and wrong-headed but so sincere! There are no heroes in this novel. No one of redeeming character. Everyone is wonderfully engaging in the most goulish way. There are long lovely discussions about dissonant music, town planning and invented languages. Riots, sex and the supernatural all have a place in this brilliant first novel. And beetles...lots of beetles. A thoroughly satisfying read.

Book preview

Boxer, Beetle - Ned Beauman

BOXER BEETLE

A Novel

NED BEAUMAN

Contents

Cover

Title Page

Epigraph

1

2   August 1934

3   August 1934

4

5   August 1935

6   November 1935

7

8   February 1936

9   March 1936

10   Autumn 1881

11   April 1936

12

13   August 1936

14   August 1936

15

16

17   October 1936

18   October 1936

19

Praise from the UK for Boxer, Beetle

Imprint

… we are all accustomed to believe that maps and reality are necessarily related, or that if they are not, we can make them so by altering reality.

Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities

Dissonance is the truth about harmony.

Theodor Adorno, Aesthetic Theory

1

In idle moments I sometimes like to close my eyes and imagine Joseph Goebbels’ forty-third birthday party. I like to think that even in the busy autumn of 1940, Hitler might have found time to organise a surprise party for his close friend – pretending for weeks that the date had slipped his mind, deliberately ignoring the Propaganda Minister’s increasingly sulky and awkward hints, and waiting until the very last order had been despatched to his U-boat commanders on the evening of Tuesday, 29 October before he led Goebbels on some pretext into the cocktail lounge of the Reich Chancellery. A great shout of ‘Alles Gute zum Geburtstag!’, a cascade of streamers, some relieved and perhaps even slightly tearful laughter from Goebbels himself as he embraced the Führer, and the party could begin.

All this is conjecture, of course. But what is certain is that at some point on that day Hitler presented Goebbels with his birthday present: an exquisite fifteen-volume illustrated edition of the complete works of Goethe, published in Stuttgart in 1881 by J. G. Gottafchen, bound in red Morocco leather with a gilded spine and marbled edges.

One can’t help feeling sorry for the soldiers of the 101st US Airborne Division who, nearly five years later, broke into a boarded-up salt mine near Berchtesgaden and splintered the schnapps crates piled inside to find not gold bullion, nor the Holy Spear of Destiny that pierced Christ’s side, nor even a single consolatory bottle of schnapps, but instead Goebbels’ personal library, stashed there in haste when the war began to turn against the Nazis. None the less, somebody was dutiful enough to make sure the books escaped the bonfires, and they were shipped back to the Library of Congress in Washington. (Meanwhile, the vast majority of Hitler’s sixteen thousand books, along with his skull and Eva Braun’s underwear, were captured by the Red Army and to this day lie mouldering in an abandoned baroque church on the Uzkoe estate near Moscow, which I can only assume is, by some distance, the spookiest building in the entire world.)

The book collection wouldn’t even be unpacked until 1952, when the job was given to a college student on work experience who probably wished he was helping out at a summer camp. By then the Gottafchen Goethe, with its fond inscription by Hitler and scattered marginalia by Goebbels, had escaped on to the open market. And some fifty years later it passed into the hands of Horace Grublock, the London property developer who until his violent death earlier this year was an irregular employer of mine.

Between 2002 and 2007 Grublock gave me three volumes (from Prometheus through to Iphigenie auf Tauris) in exchange for errands, promising that one day, if I were loyal, I would collect the whole set. It was humiliating, but Grublock said he’d never sell – and even if he did, the sort of dealers who could handle the Goebbels Gottafchen Goethe wouldn’t have taken so much as a telephone call from the likes of me, Kevin Broom – and even if they would, I could never have afforded it – so I had no choice. That’s why, one day in September, when Grublock called at ten o’clock on a Thursday night, back when I’d never even heard of the town of Roachmorton, I ran for my phone with toothpaste still dribbling from my mouth, knowing it had to be him.

‘Fishy,’ he said.

‘Yes, Horace?’

‘You remember that private investigator who’s been doing a spot of work for me? Zroszak?’

‘I think so.’

‘He’s supposed to check in every evening by telephone. But he’s missed two nights now, without any warning. I’ve tried to call him myself and there’s no answer. Drive over and see if he’s all right.’

‘To his office?’

‘He doesn’t have an office. He works out of his home, like a suburban palm-reader. It’s in Camden. It’ll only take you ten minutes.’ He gave me the address.

‘What’s he doing for you?’

‘You know perfectly well I can’t tell you, Fishy. As contingently loyal as you may be to me, I know your real allegiance is to your internet friends. Unless by any chance you’ve heard of a fellow called Seth Roach?’

‘I hadn’t.’

‘That’s that, then. Off you go.’

I am often asked the question, ‘Why would you become a collector of rare Nazi memorabilia unless you are yourself a secret Nazi?’ Or, anyway, I expect I would often be asked that question, if anyone knew about my hobby beyond Grublock, my former cleaning lady Maria, and (as Grublock calls them) my ‘internet friends’.

I’m not a secret Nazi. I feel sick when I think about what they did. So do you, probably. And if just the thought can provoke a spurious little shiver of survivor’s guilt, imagine what it’s like to pick up an SS dagger in your hand. I don’t know of any experience like it: you feel as if you’re doing something terribly wrong, and yet you know it can’t be wrong because you’re doing no harm to anyone. It’s stupid and exhilarating and revelatory. Normally you can’t get a proper look at your own conscience because it only ever comes out to gash you with its beak and you just want to do whatever you can to push it away; but put your conscience in the cage of this paradox, where it can slither and bark but it can’t hurt you, and you can study it for as long as you wish. Most people don’t truly know how they feel about the Holocaust because they’re worried that if they think about it too hard they’ll find out they don’t feel sad enough about the 6 million dead, but I’m an expert in my own soul.

I should also add that prices for Nazi memorabilia can go up 10 or 20 per cent a year. Try getting a return like that on the stock market. I trade on internet auction sites, exploiting the stupidity and laziness of dabblers who don’t realise or don’t care that they could get a better price from a real dealer. Like all capitalists, I treat the free market like a rich old grandmother, insisting I adore the bitch, calling her sprightly, but more than happy to exploit her lethargy and dementia for profit. If she tries to grope my business interests with her Invisible Hand I just give her a slap. In my day job I specialise in the Allied forces from the Second World War, but I also do the Crimea, the Great War and Vietnam, plus the occasional Japanese samurai sword. (I would never buy or sell any Nazi stuff merely for profit.) I used to work in accounting, but I hated taking instructions from clients, and more importantly I thought it would be convenient if my employment were coextensional with my vocation – this way I can justify the hours I spend at my computer scouring catalogues and auction listings and messageboards. And that pays my rent, but I never have the liquidity to make any really big deals, and often I have to save for months just to afford, say, one of Ilsa Koch’s cigarette cases.

So, among collectors, I am a worm – and particularly so in comparison to Stuart, my best friend, who rivals even Grublock. Every once in a while a week will go by when I’m too angry to speak to Stuart because he has refused to bid for some irresistible treasure, letting it fly away to Tokyo, never to be seen again. He could afford almost anything: the only child of a hedge fund maestro, he supplemented his inheritance with a considerable legal settlement after an accident with an office coffee machine left him paralysed from the waist down. I often wonder whether I’d give up the use of my own legs in exchange for, say, the gold fountain pen with which Adolf Hitler and Rudolf Hess wrote Mein Kampf, and I’m fairly sure that I would. It’s not as if I leave the house very often, and Stuart always seems perfectly cheerful despite his disability (adding weight to my persistent suspicion that his paid carer will take extra for giving him hand jobs). Conversely, I also often wonder whether I’d give up such a prize in exchange for a cure for my trimethylaminuria; and, to tell the truth, as much as I hate my trimethylaminuria, I think I’d be willing not only to live with the disease, but to inflict it on Stuart too, if I could get my hands on that pen.

I mention all this only so that you can understand that I am not like Grublock. Not like him at all. Once, I heard my former employer explain his vast collection to an investor from Russia. ‘In a sense, I suppose, I am a Nazi,’ he said thoughtfully. ‘I admire their ambition. Their courage. Their style, in the Nietzschean sense. They allowed no exceptions to their vision, and that is a lesson we should all learn. And of course I love the architecture, although sadly most of it only exists as blueprints.’

‘But you also hate Jews?’ said the Russian.

‘Certainly not. As I said, I have great respect for certain aspects of Nazism, but not for their odd, embarrassing phobias. All that is irrational, and I’m no irrationalist. You can easily tell the collectors with those leanings. They have the books purportedly bound in human skin and the bars of soap purportedly made from human fat. Idiotic. It’s almost impossible to tell tanned human skin from tanned pig skin, and the soap myth is simply that. But they so want it to be true that they will waste their money anyway. That is, if they’re not deniers – in that case, you’ll find none of the nasty stuff but probably some contemporaneous documentary evidence proving that Dachau was just an experimental vegetable garden, or some such rot.’ He drained his gin and tonic. ‘No, I certainly don’t hate Jews. I feel sorry for the Nazis’ victims, in as much as it’s possible to feel sorry for a mass of proletarian foreigners who died decades before one was born. And I admit that Hitler was probably mad, or evil, or an utter bastard, in as much as there is any difference between the three, and in as much as it makes any more sense to apply those words to a dead dictator than to apply them to an earthquake or a hurricane. And I think it was wrong to try to take over Europe, in as much as any one man’s chosen political aims can be any more or less legitimate than any other’s.’

The absurd thing, by the way, about Grublock’s collection, which occupied the upper floor of his triplex penthouse, was that it outdid the Nazis themselves: never in the history of the Deutsches Reich would half so much finery have been gathered together in one room. It was more as if some Las Vegas entrepreneurs had started a casino in the eighties called Hitler’s Palace. The centrepiece of the simulacrum was a glass case containing the Luftwaffe uniform of General Walter von Axhelm, including his Knight’s Cross and his emerald-encrusted ornamental hunting dagger with a blade that belonged originally to Napoleon. Beside it was Grublock’s most valuable treasure, a gorgeous porcelain falconry chest made for Hermann Goering. The rest of the room was crammed with more uniforms, medals, weapons, torture devices, ornaments and paintings, all lit by small dim spotlights. The walls were draped with long red silk banners with black swastikas on white circles. It was a wonderland. So when Grublock wouldn’t even give me a hint of what Zroszak was doing for him, I could be sure that the detective was on the trail of something truly extraordinary.

I changed back out of my pyjamas and went downstairs to the car. Happy Fried Chicken, over which I live, was full of drunkards as usual – its popularity used to baffle me until I found out one of the cooks sells cannabis. It was a cold night, and as I drove over to a block of flats near the canal London felt like a whispered conversation between street lights. I wanted to listen to the radio (there’s a pirate station I like called Myth FM) but I could find nothing on my crippled car system but shreds of white noise. The London air must be heavy with static, I always think, the electromagnetism rising from cars and microwave ovens and telephone wires – another thin dead residue of the city, like rust and dust and soot – I have no doubt the rats and pigeons and cockroaches have learned to navigate by it.

When I got to Zroszak’s flat I buzzed his intercom but no one answered, so I waited in the cold until a girl in a grey dress came out and I grabbed the outer door as it swung shut behind her. She wrinkled her nose as she went past. Upstairs, the door of 3B was slightly ajar. The lock was broken. I knocked, but again there was no answer, so I said ‘Mr Zroszak?’ and pushed the door open.

Inside the small, sparse flat I saw Zroszak kneeling behind a desk as if he were praying, with his head slumped forward so that his face was hidden. There was dried blood on the edge of the desk and a dark stain where it had dripped on to the carpet. As I moved closer I could see the greenish black veins bulging on his forehead, and smell the rot already coming on like an old dull blade being slowly sharpened. All this was quite familiar from the many television dramas I watch about glamorous forensic investigators – the ones which almost make one want to be murdered just to have such a sexy woman hold your lungs in her soft hands, the ones where they primp the crime scene like an ageing film actress, with powders and tweezers and respectful murmurs – but I wasn’t a detective and I just wanted to turn around and run away.

Shaking, I dialled Grublock.

‘Fishy.’

‘He’s dead,’ I said.

‘Oh, fucking hell. How?’

‘Shot, I think. With a gun.’

‘Fucking hell. Bloody Japanese, I bet. One of those awful little consortiums. They get up to vulgar nonsense like this all the time. Well, thank you, Fishy. Go home. I’ll send someone over who knows what they’re doing.’

I hung up. Looking around, I realised that the place had been ransacked. The drawers of Zroszak’s filing cabinet were open but empty, and there were no books on any of the shelves. On the desk, next to the murdered man’s head, were a sketchpad, a pencil, a rubber and a book called How to Draw Dogs and Cats. Apart from that, if there had ever been even the slightest trace of Zroszak’s personality in his comfortless flat, it was missing now, like the moral of a story forgetfully told.

If I could find out anything important, I thought, Grublock would probably buy me a Panzer tank for Christmas. But even if Zroszak’s killer or killers had missed anything, there was no way I could search for clues with Zroszak’s body there. Just the thought had me running to the tiny kitchen for an ice cube to suck on – my late mother’s trusted remedy for anxiety.

The light in Zroszak’s freezer was broken, and the ice tray was stuck to the bottom surface. I pulled on it hard, and it came away with a little cough of frost. As it did so, something dropped to the tiled floor.

I bent down and picked it up. It was a sealed foil packet, like an astronaut might have for his tomato soup. I cut it open with my Swiss Army knife. Inside was a yellowed sheet of paper, folded in quarters. I smoothed it out on the kitchen table and glanced over the typewritten text. The letter was headed with the address of the Führerbau on Arcisstrasse in Munich, dated 4 October, 1936, and directed to somebody called Philip Erskine at a street in Clerkenwell. When I saw the signature of the sender, I scrabbled desperately for an ice cube.

Dear Doctor Erskine,

I have received gifts from popes, tycoons, and heads of state, but none have ever been so singular or unexpected as your kind tribute. It is a reminder that the conquests of the scientist are every bit as important to our future as the conquests of the soldier. I hope you will keep me informed of the progress of your work – perhaps one day the Third Reich will have a position for you. How is your German?

Fond regards,

Adolf Hitler

Reichschancellor

I spent the next half hour searching every inch of Zroszak’s flat. His body didn’t matter any more. But I found nothing.

2

AUGUST 1934

Pock wasn’t just losing to Sinner – he was being skinned, diced, erased. It seemed to Pock that this hairless runt could see inside him – could see Pock’s memory of his first kiss, or his trick of wiggling his ears in time to a song, or his hatred of cats – could see it, take careful aim, and knock it out of his head like a loose tooth. Soon there would be nothing left of Pock but meat. Never had he felt punches so precise and impatient and cruel. And the other boy was impossibly clean – not a speck of blood on him – and although his bony chest did shine with sweat under the lights, it was a thin, efficient, cooling sweat, not the sour chicken soup that gushed into Pock’s eyes and dripped from his chin and gathered in his shorts to make his cock feel heavier than his fists.

Premierland had once been a warehouse for Fairclough’s, the butcher’s, and if Pock felt like meat then so did many of the thousand people watching him, who were not just packed in together like meat but smoked like meat too, squinting through a blue cigarette fog so dense you could hardly see the steel girders that held up the roof. And if this tiny demon Yid hadn’t decided to give the sell-out crowd a show then Pock wouldn’t have lasted a round, he knew that. But Pock had never, ever been knocked out in the ring, and it wasn’t going to happen tonight, with his husky-squeaky Myrna down there watching – he could never fuck her again if she saw him helpless on his back, fucked. So when the bell rang and Pock staggered back to his corner he didn’t listen to his trainer’s yammering, didn’t take a gulp of water, didn’t even knock his left fist on his right boot like he usually did for luck, he just swore under his breath and stared across the ring at Sinner, who stared back from his stool, expressionless, one arm draped over the ropes, as Max Frink, Sinner’s trainer and manager, splashed him with ice water. Then the bell rang again, and Sinner spat twice and jumped up and skipped forward, already moving (as the young reporter from Boxing would put it) ‘like a dozen kind admirers were trying to present him with a garland of poison ivy’. Pock was trudging along with his heels down on the canvas, while Sinner was still bouncing up almost on his toes. They circled each other, and Pock made a few tired jabs that he knew Sinner would dodge, then got a hard right hook to his kidneys in return – he’d dribble blood in his sleep tonight, wake up with stained underwear like a girl – feinted, blocked, feinted, and finally reached way down to thump Sinner in the balls.

(This, anyway, is how I’m almost sure it must have happened.)

Even Frink, veteran of a hundred Spitalfields street brawls, winced and clenched his teeth then, but Sinner, who’d actually taken the punch, merely grunted. Rage did come to his eyes, but that was nothing to do with pain: Sinner and pain were long estranged. Instead, Frink thought to himself, it was Sinner’s realisation that he might be about to be cheated out of his knock-out. As the crowd jeered, delighted with this bit of slapstick, Frink looked down at the referee (who in those days stood outside the ring, surrounded by a mob of gamblers determined to make his decisions for him), hoping Mottle would have that brittle squint of a referee who knows he’s missed something important but is too stubborn to admit his error – two times out of three you could stick a thumb in the other man’s eye and not get caught – but to Frink’s dismay Mottle was barking, ‘Foul! Foul!’

‘Nah, piss off,’ said Sinner. ‘That weren’t a foul. It didn’t hurt. Fight’s still on.’

‘Below the belt,’ insisted Mottle. There was already a scuffle starting among the gamblers behind him. Pock flung his hands in the air and shook his head as if to protest his innocence.

‘It didn’t even hurt,’ said Sinner, glaring down at Mottle. ‘Prick couldn’t hurt me. Put a cobblestone in his glove and he couldn’t hurt me.’

‘We won’t have any cheating here.’ Mottle looked over to the judges’ table for confirmation.

‘I want to fucking fight. They all want me to fight.’ Sinner turned to shout at his trainer. ‘Frink, tell him! This is a piss-take!’

‘You’ve won, son. Rules is rules.’

‘Bollocks to this.’

Mottle nodded to the announcer. ‘Ladies and gentlemen, Seth Sinner Roach!’ There was a sarcastic, resentful cheer from a few of the crowd, and then they went back to hooting and booing, even louder now, no longer in mockery but in anger. They’d been cheated, just like Sinner, and before long an itchy discordant drone would start to rise up to the ceiling of Premierland, a threat you didn’t hear with your ears but with your stomach and fists. Tonight there would be knives out all the way down Commercial Road, Pock thought, not just the gamblers but everyone who’d lost out on what they’d paid for. It didn’t matter how good the first three fights were

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1