The Quotable Lewis
By Jerry Root and Wayne Martindale
5/5
()
About this ebook
Read more from Jerry Root
The Sacrament of Evangelism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Misquotable C.S. Lewis: What He Didn’t Say, What He Actually Said, and Why It Matters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOn Being Human(e): Comenius’ Pedagogical Humanization as an Anthropological Problem Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Neglected C. S. Lewis: Exploring the Riches of His Most Overlooked Books Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Surprising Imagination of C. S. Lewis: An Introduction Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related to The Quotable Lewis
Related ebooks
Beyond the Shadowlands (Foreword by Walter Hooper): C. S. Lewis on Heaven and Hell Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Image and Imagination Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5C.S. Lewis: Series Reading Order - with Summaries & Checklist Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Collected Letters of C.S. Lewis, Volume 2 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5C.S. Lewis’ Little Book of Wisdom: Meditations on Faith, Life, Love and Literature Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Year with C. S. Lewis: Daily Readings from His Classic Works Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5NRSV, The C. S. Lewis Bible: For Reading, Reflection, and Inspiration Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Collected Letters of C.S. Lewis, Volume 1: Family Letters, 1905-1931 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Studies in Words Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Problem of Pain Study Guide: A Bible Study on the C.S. Lewis Book The Problem of Pain Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsC. S. Lewis: A Biography Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsC.S. Lewis' Miracles Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Letters of C. S. Lewis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Discarded Image: An Introduction to Medieval and Renaissance Literature Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Paved with Good Intentions: A Demon's Road Map to Your Soul Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Experiment in Criticism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Discussing Mere Christianity Bible Study Guide: Exploring the History, Meaning, and Relevance of C.S. Lewis's Greatest Book Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Romantic Rationalist: God, Life, and Imagination in the Work of C. S. Lewis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPlain to the Inward Eye: Selected Essays on C.S. Lewis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVirtue and Vice: A Dictionary of the Good Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lewis Agonistes: How C.S. Lewis Can Train Us to Wrestle with the Modern and Postmodern World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Spirits in Bondage: A Cycle of Lyrics Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Yours, Jack: Spiritual Direction from C.S. Lewis Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Words to Live By: A Guide for the Merely Christian Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5C.S. Lewis: Revelation, Conversion, and Apologetics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsC.S. Lewis and Christian Postmodernism: Word, Image, and Beyond Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe A-Z of C.S. Lewis: An encyclopaedia of his life, thought, and writings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Family Guide to Narnia: Biblical Truths in C.S. Lewis's The Chronicles of Narnia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dark Tower: And Other Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Christianity For You
The Screwtape Letters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Decluttering at the Speed of Life: Winning Your Never-Ending Battle with Stuff Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boundaries Updated and Expanded Edition: When to Say Yes, How to Say No To Take Control of Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Present Over Perfect: Leaving Behind Frantic for a Simpler, More Soulful Way of Living Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 5 Love Languages: The Secret to Love that Lasts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anxious for Nothing: Finding Calm in a Chaotic World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mere Christianity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Uninvited: Living Loved When You Feel Less Than, Left Out, and Lonely Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Purpose Driven Life: What on Earth Am I Here For? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good Boundaries and Goodbyes: Loving Others Without Losing the Best of Who You Are Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Wild at Heart Expanded Edition: Discovering the Secret of a Man's Soul Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: Follow Them and People Will Follow You Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I'll Start Again Monday: Break the Cycle of Unhealthy Eating Habits with Lasting Spiritual Satisfaction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Less Fret, More Faith: An 11-Week Action Plan to Overcome Anxiety Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Story: The Bible as One Continuing Story of God and His People Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Undistracted: Capture Your Purpose. Rediscover Your Joy. Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Girl, Wash Your Face: Stop Believing the Lies About Who You Are so You Can Become Who You Were Meant to Be Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Stories We Tell: Every Piece of Your Story Matters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Don't Give the Enemy a Seat at Your Table: It's Time to Win the Battle of Your Mind... Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Good Girl's Guide to Great Sex: Creating a Marriage That's Both Holy and Hot Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5NIV, Holy Bible Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Changes That Heal: Four Practical Steps to a Happier, Healthier You Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Law of Connection: Lesson 10 from The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Bible Recap: A One-Year Guide to Reading and Understanding the Entire Bible Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Everybody, Always: Becoming Love in a World Full of Setbacks and Difficult People Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Boundaries Workbook: When to Say Yes, How to Say No to Take Control of Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Book of Enoch Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Quotable Lewis
1 rating0 reviews
Book preview
The Quotable Lewis - Jerry Root
Visit Tyndale online at www.tyndale.com.
TYNDALE and Tyndale’s quill logo are registered trademarks of Tyndale House Publishers, Inc.
The Quotable Lewis
Copyright © 1990 by Wayne Martindale and Jerry Root. All rights reserved.
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe is a trademark of C. S. Lewis (Pte) Ltd.
Extracts from Cross-Examination
are taken from Decision magazine, September-October 1963, copyright © 1963 Billy Graham Evangelistic Association. Used by permission. All rights reserved.
Extracts from the following works are used by permission of The Bodley Head: Out of the Silent Planet; Perelandra; That Hideous Strength.
Extracts from the following works, copyright © on date shown, are reprinted with the permission of Cambridge University Press: The Discarded Image (1964); An Experiment in Criticism (1961); Selected Literary Essays (1969); Spenser’s Images of Life (1967); Studies in Medieval and Renaissance Literature (1966); Studies in Words (1967).
Extracts from the following works of C. S. Lewis are reproduced by permission of William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd. as publisher and copyright editor: The Abolition of Man; Fern-Seed and Elephants and Other Essays on Christianity, edited by Walter Hooper; George MacDonald: An Anthology, by George MacDonald, edited and with introduction by C. S. Lewis; The Great Divorce; The Horse and His Boy; The Last Battle; The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe; The Magician’s Nephew; Mere Christianity; Miracles; The Pilgrim’s Regress; Poems, edited by Walter Hooper; Prince Caspian; The Problem of Pain; The Screwtape Letters; Screwtape Proposes a Toast and Other Pieces; The Silver Chair; The Voyage of the Dawn Treader; The Weight of Glory and Other Addresses.
Extracts from the following works, copyright © by C. S. Lewis (Pte) Ltd. on date shown, are reproduced by permission of Curtis Brown, London: The Personal Heresy (1939); God in the Dock (1970); Rehabilitations (1939); Essays Presented to Charles Williams (1947).
Extracts from the following works are reprinted by permission of Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.: Christian Reflections; Letters to an American Lady; Taliessin Through Logres, The Region of the Summer Stars, Arthurian Torso.
Extracts from the following works of C. S. Lewis, and copyright © by C. S. Lewis (Pte) Ltd. on date shown, are reprinted by permission of Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.: Boxen: The Imaginary World of the Young C. S. Lewis, edited by Walter Hooper (1985); The Dark Tower: And Other Stories, edited by Walter Hooper (1977); The Four Loves (1960 by Helen Joy Lewis; renewed 1988 by Arthur Owen Barfield); Letters of C. S. Lewis, edited by W. H. Lewis (1966); Letters to Malcolm: Chiefly on Prayer (1964); Narrative Poems, edited by Walter Hooper (1969); Of Other Worlds: Essays and Stories, edited by Walter Hooper (1966); On Stories and Other Essays on Literature, edited by Walter Hooper (1965); Poems, edited by Walter Hooper (1964); Present Concerns, edited by Walter Hooper (1986); Reflections on the Psalms (1958; renewed 1986 by Arthur Owen Barfield); Spirits in Bondage: A Cycle of Lyrics (1984); Surprised by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life (1955; renewed 1983 by Arthur Owen Barfield); Till We Have Faces: A Myth Retold (1957; renewed 1985 by Arthur Owen Barfield); The World’s Last Night and Other Essays (1960; renewed 1988 by Arthur Owen Barfield).
Extracts from the following works are reprinted by permission of Harper & Rowe, Publishers, Inc.: A Grief Observed by C. S. Lewis, copyright © 1962 by N. W. Clerk; A Severe Mercy by Sheldon Vanauken, copyright © 1977, 1980 by Sheldon Vanauken.
Extracts from the following works of C. S. Lewis, and copyright © by C. S. Lewis (Pte) Ltd. on date shown, are reprinted with permission of MacMillan Publishing Company: The Letters of C. S. Lewis to Arthur Greeves, edited by Walter Hooper (1979); Letters to Children, edited by Lyle W. Dorsett and Marjorie Lamp Mead (1985).
Extracts from the following works, copyright © on date shown, are reprinted by permission of Oxford University Press: The Allegory of Love (1936); English Literature in the Sixteenth Century, Excluding Drama (1954); A Preface to Paradise Lost
(1942).
Extracts from Letters: C. S. Lewis/Don Giovanni Calabria, copyright © 1988 English language translation Martin Moynihan. Reprinted with permission of Servant Publications, P.O. Box 8617, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 89-50921. ISBN 978-0-8423-5115-7.
109 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
96 95 94 93 92 91 90
This book is dedicated with love and affection to our wives: Nita Martindale and Claudia Root
Table of Contents
A B C D E
F G H I J
K L M N O
P Q R S T
U V W Z
Index
Preface
Introduction
A
Absolute Values
Addison, Joseph
Adoration
Adulthood
Advice
Affection
Aging
Aging: Middle Age
Aging: Youth
Agnosticism
Allegory
Ambition
America
America, Discovery of
Angels
Anger
Anxiety
Apologetics
Architecture
Art and Literature
Art Appreciation
Art, Duty of
Art, Essence of
Art, Function of
Art, Value of
Ascham, Roger
Aslan
Atheism
Austen, Jane
B
Bacon, Francis
Baptism
Beauty
Beethoven, Ludwig van
Belief
Belief, Christian
Bereavement
Bible as Literature
Bible, Essence of the
Bible: Inspiration
Bible Interpretation
Bible: Modern translations
Bible Scholars
Bible Translation
Biography
Body
Body and Spirit
Books
Books, Christian
Bores
Bourgeoisie
Bulverism
Bunyan, John
Bureaucracy
C
Calvin, John
Calvin, John: Institutes
Cambridge/Oxford
Capital Punishment
Catholicism: and Protestantism
Cats
Certainty
Chapman, George
Character, Christian
Character, Personal
Chastity
Chaucer, Geoffrey
Chaucer, Geoffrey: Parlement of Foules
Chaucer, Geoffrey: Troilus and Cryseide
Child Rearing
Childhood
Children
Children’s Literature
China
Chivalry
Choice
Christlikeness
Christian Living
Christian Perspective
Christian Year, the
Christianity And
Christianity and Comfort
Christianity and Controversy
Christianity and Culture
Christianity and Its Detractors
Christianity and Life-style
Christianity and Literature
Christianity and Social Good
Christianity and the Ancient World
Christianity and the Human Condition
Christianity and the Intellect
Christianity and Truth
Christianity, Essence of
Christianity: Evidences
Christianity: Intellectual Honesty in Exploring
Christianity, Popular
Christmas
Church Attendance
Church: Body of Christ
Church: Diversity
Church: Divisions
Church: Endurance
Church: Function
Church History
Church Music
Church: Unity
Church of England
Circumstances
Civilization
Clergy
Cliques
Colet, John
Comedy
Commitment
Common People
Communism
Companionship
Comparisons
Conscience
Contentment
Conversion
Conversion, Excitement at
Conviction
Correspondence
Courage
Courtesy
Coverdale, Myles
Cowper, William
Cranmer, Thomas
Creation
Creativity
Criminal Justice
Criticism
Criticism, Anthropological
Cruelty
D
Daniel, Samuel
Dante
De La Mare, Walter
De Meun, Jean
De Troyes, Chretien
Death
Death: Lazarus
Deception
Decisions
Decorum
Definitions
Democracy
Dependence on God
Depravity
Design
Despair
Devils
Devotions
Didacticism
Disappointment
Discipline
Divorce
Doctrine
Donne, John
Donne, John: Love Poetry
Doubt
Drayton, Michael
Dreams
Dryden, John
Dumas, Alexandre
Dunbar, William
Duty
Dying to Self
E
Easter
Economics
Education
Education and Christianity
Education, Decline of
Education, Democracy in
Education, Function of
Education, Goal of
Education, Purpose of
Education, Quality of
Education: Teacher/Pupil Relationship
Embarrassment
Endurance
England, Religion in
Envy
Equality
Equality and Christianity
Eternal Life
Eternity
Ethics
Evangelism
Evil in society
Evil Men
Evil Motivation of
Evolution
Exaggeration
Excerpts
Expectations of Others
Expectations, Realistic
Experience
Extremes
F
Fairy Tales
Faith
Faith and Works
Fall, The
Fame
Family
Family Manners
Fantasy
Fasting
Fatherhood
Fear
Feelings
Firsthand Knowledge
Forgetfulness
Forgiveness
Free Will
Freudian Criticism
Friendship
Friendship, Dangers of
Fun
Futility
Future
G
Gambling
Gascoigne, George
Gender
Giving
Glory
God: Approaching Him
God: Completeness
God: Creator
God: Eternity
God: Gender Imagery for
God: Glorifying Him
God: Glory
God: Goodness
God: Holiness
God: Image of
God: Indescribability
God: Infinity
God: Language about
God: Lewis’s Childhood Conception
God: Love
God: Modern Attitude
God: Omnipresence
God: Our Need for
God: Personalness
God: Providence
God: Reality
God: Self-existence
God: Sovereignty
God: Timelessness
God: Transcendence/Immanence
God’s Will
Gods, Greek
Good And Evil
Good Life
Good Works
Goodness
Government
Grace
Grammar, Rules of
Greatness
Greed
Grief
Growth
Guests
Guilt
H
Happiness
Happiness and Christianity
Hatred
Health
Heaven
Heaven: Longing for
Heaven: Ultimate Reality
Hell: Escape
Hell: God’s Mercy
Hell: Judgment
Hell: Judgment and Mercy
Hell: Mental Torment
Hell: Self-centeredness
Hell: Self-chosen
Hell: Separation from God
Hell: Separation from Heaven
Hell: Separation from Humanity
Hell: Unfulfilled Potential
Hero Worship
Heywood, John
Hierarchy
Historians
History Books
History, Christian View of
History, Function of
History, Importance of
History, Periods of
History, Philosophy of
History, Scientific
History, Skeptics of
Holiness
Holy Spirit
Home
Homesickness
Homosexuality
Hooker, Richard
Hope
Horizon
Houseman, A. E.
Human Desires
Human Destiny
Human Nature
Human Situation
Human Spirit
Humanism
Humility
Humor
Husbands
Hymns
Hypocrisy
I
Identity
Images
Imagination
Immortality
Incarnation
Independence
Influence
Inhibitions
Innocence
Inspiration
Instinct
Interruptions
Intolerance
Introspection
J
Jargon
Jesus: Creator
Jesus: Creator/Word
Jesus: Death of
Jesus: God Incarnate
Jesus: God, Lunatic, or Evil Man
Jesus: Relationship to the Father
Jesus: Savior
Jesus: Second Coming
Jesus: Son of God
Jesus: Teaching
Jesus: Unfallen
Jews
Johnson, Samuel
Joy
Joy: As Sehnsucht or Longing
Judgment, The Last
Jungian Criticism
K
Keats, John: Endymion
Kilns, The
King James Version
Kipling, Rudyard
Knowledge
Knox, John
L
Labels
Lamb, Charles
Language
Latimer, Hugh
Law
Lawrence, D. H.
Laymen
Leadership
Lewis, Albert
Lewis, C. S.: Abolition of Man
Lewis, C. S.: Evangelistic Writing
Lewis, C. S.: His Writing
Lewis, C. S.: Letters to Malcolm: Chiefly on Prayer
Lewis, C. S.: Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe
Lewis, C. S.: Mere Christianity
Lewis, C. S.: Mere Christianity
in his books
Lewis, C. S.: Out of the Silent Planet
Lewis, C. S.: Perelandra
Lewis, C. S.: Pilgrim’s Regress
Lewis, C. S.: Screwtape Letters
Lewis, C. S.: That Hideous Strength
Lewis, C. S.: Till We Have Faces
Lewis, Joy Davidman Gresham
Liberty
Life
Life and Death
Literalism
Literary Criticism
Literary History
Literature
Literature, Classic
Literature, Contemporary
Liturgiology
Longing
Love
Love: Abuses
Love: Being Lovable
Love: Charity
Love: Dangers
Love: God’s Love for Us
Love: Our Love for God
Love: Our Love for Jesus
Love: Priorities
Love: Romantic
Loyalty
Lust
Luther, Martin
Lyly, John
M
MacDonald, George
Machiavelli: The Prince
Marlowe, Christopher
Marriage
Marriage or Singleness
Marxism
Masculine
Materialism and Christianity
Materialism, Philosophical
Maturity
Memory
Mercy
Metaphor
Middle Ages
Middle Ages: Literature
Miracles
Missions
Money
Moral Relapse
Moralists
Morality
More, Sir Thomas
More, Sir Thomas: Supplication of Souls
More, Sir Thomas: Utopia
Mornings
Motives
Mystery
Mysticism
Myth
Myth: and Christianity
N
Nashe, Thomas
Nationalism
Natural Gifts, Danger of
Naturalism
Nature
Nature and Christianity
Nature and Religion
Nature, Laws of
Necessary Evils
Newspapers
Nonsense
Nostalgia
Novella
Novels
Novelty
O
Obedience
One Way
Opinion, Popular
Opposition
Order from Chaos
Ordered Life
Originality
Orwell, George: 1984 and Animal Farm
Outsiders
P
Pacifism
Pain
Pantheism
Parliament
Patriotism
Paul, St.
Peace
Peer Pressure
Persecution
Personhood
Perspective
Pessimism
Philosophy: Dualism
Philosophy, Essence of
Philosophy, Good and Bad
Planning
Plato
Platonism and Christianity
Poetic Revolutions
Poetry
Poetry, Ancient and Modern
Poetry, Modern
Poets and Poetry
Poets, Metaphysical
Political Power
Politics
Politics and Christianity
Politics, Christians in
Possessiveness
Post-Christian Europe
Post-Christian Man
Power
Prayer
Prayer: Answers
Prayer: Communion with God
Prayer: Confession
Prayer: Distractions
Prayer: Duty
Prayer: Petition
Prayer: Timing/Habits
Preaching
Predestination
Prejudice
Pretentiousness
Pride
Priorities
Progress
Prose
Protestantism
Psalms
Psalms: Imprecatory
Psychiatrists
Purgatory
Puritanism
Puritanism: Sexuality
Purity
Purpose
Q
Questions: Moral, Philosophical, and Theological
R
Reading
Reading Old Books
Reality
Reason
Rebellion: Against God
Redemption
Reformation
Reincarnation
Religion
Religion and Domestic Life
Religion, Dangers of
Resurrection: Jesus
Resurrection: Jesus and the Saved
Resurrection: The Saved
Resurrection: The Saved and Animals
Revelation
Reverence
Rights
Romance (As a Literary Genre)
Ruskin, John
S
Salvation
Sanctification
Satan
Sayers, Dorothy
Scholarship
Science and Christianity
Scots
Scott, Sir Walter
Self-Concept
Self-Control
Self-Description
Self-Giving
Self-Image
Selfishness
Sermon on the Mount
Servanthood
Shakespeare, William
Shakespeare, William: Hamlet
Shakespeare, William: King Lear
Shakespeare, William: The Merchant of Venice
Shakespeare, William: Sonnets
Shakespeare, William: The Winter’s Tale
Shelley, Percy
Shelley, Percy: Prometheus Unbound
Sidney, Sir Philip
Sidney, Sir Philip: Arcadia
Sidney, Sir Philip: Astrophel and Stella
Sidney, Sir Philip: Defence of Poesie
Sin
Sin, Shame over
Sincerity
Sixteenth-Century England
Sixteenth-Century Literature
Sixteenth-Century Religion
Skelton, John
Skepticism
Sleep
Sloth
Smoking
Snobbery
Sonnet Sequence
Spenser, Edmund
Spenser, Edmund: Epithalamion
Spenser, Edmund: The Faerie Queene
Spiritual Growth
Spirituality
Stereotypes
Story
Students
Style
Suffering
Surrender
Surrey, Earl of (Henry Howard)
Survival
Suspicion
Swift, Jonathan
Swift, Jonathan: Gulliver’s Travels
Symbol
Symbolism
T
Tasso: Gerusalemme
Taste
Technology
Technology and Christianity
Teetotalism
Temperance
Temptation
Thanksgiving
Theology and Politics
Theology in Daily Life
Theology, Liberal
Theory
Thomas õ Kempis
Time
Tolerance
Tolkien, J. R. R.
Tolkien, J. R. R.: The Lord of the Rings
Tolstoy, Leo
Translation
Transposition
Tribulation
Trilemma
Trinity
Trust
Truth
Truth, Discovery of
Tyndale, William
Tyndale, William: Bible Translation
Tyndale, William: Compared with Thomas More
Tyranny
U
Understanding
Unselfishness
Utilitarianism
V
Value Judgments
Vicariousness
Virgil: Similes
Virgin Birth
Virtue
Vivisection
Vocation
Vulgarity
W
War
War: Atomic Bomb
War, Nuclear
Weather
Williams, Charles
Williams, Charles: He Came Down from Heaven
Williams, Charles: The Place of the Lion
Wisdom
Women: Emancipation
Women in the Church
Women: Sexuality and Justice
Words
Work
Work, Compulsive
World Religions and Christianity
World Religions: Hinduism
World Religions: Islam
World Religions: monotheism
Worldview
Worship: Mary Magdalene
Writing
Writing, Autobiographical
Writing, Christian
Writing, Creative
Z
Zeal
Bibliographies
About the Editors
Notes
Preface
For students, speakers, writers, and anyone who desires to contemplate great thought on a particular topic, this anthology can be put to use in several ways. You can use it for:
1. Reference. Who has not at times wished to reclaim the whole of a quote only partially remembered, forgetting even the book in which it appeared? Here’s help.
2. Access. Several excerpts on a given topic are often gathered into one place, and the index points to related ideas.
3. Illustration. These excerpts help bring speeches, sermons, lectures, and papers to life. An author as quotable as Lewis is a godsend to communicators of every kind.
4. Understanding. There is enough substance in these excerpts to deepen thinking on a wide range of topics.
5. Perspective. A sense of the vast panorama of Lewis’s remarkable mind emerges from even a brief survey of these selections.
6. Browsing. This Lewis anthology can fill reflective moments with pleasure and instruction—nourishment for the mind, spirit, and imagination.
Several other anthologies of Lewis are in print, and their purposes vary from devotional readings to collections of quotes on specified topics. This anthology is unique for two reasons. First, comprehensiveness. It draws on all of Lewis’s published work (except uncollected letters and book reviews), something never before attempted. We have tried to represent the full range of Lewis’s thought—not just the popular or catchy phrase but the representative treatment, whenever excerptible, across the entire, varied range of his work. We have read every published book, including collections of sermons, short stories, juvenilia, articles, addresses, poems, and letters—some sixty books—to insure comprehensive coverage (see the bibliographies).
Second, organization and indexing. The table of contents lists the topics that are included, arranged alphabetically. Many excerpts are so rich and suggestive that they could logically be categorized under a half dozen topics. For space considerations, however, an excerpt is printed only once. Consult the index for additional quotations on a related topic and for any passage on the fringes of memory that you are trying to track down. Of necessity we made many judgment calls, not only for topic selection but for what to quote and how much. If one of your favorite Lewis quotes is nowhere to be found, we apologize in advance.
Whenever a topic includes multiple excerpts, we arranged the excerpts in chronological order. This may allow you to discover some development in Lewis’s thought—how an idea in bud early on opens into full flower in his later work. For example, before Lewis became a Christian he appears to have been somewhat anti-Semitic. After his conversion he developed sympathies for the Jews and was appreciative of their literature. Ultimately he married Joy Davidman Gresham, who was of Jewish heritage. (We have not attempted to hide anything; some excerpts reveal Lewis’s idiosyncrasies and ideas at odds with our own belief and practice.)
You can also discover from multiple excerpts within a topic how Lewis works out a thought from genre to genre. He expressed most of his central ideas in nonfiction, fiction, letters, and sometimes poems. We were impressed anew with how mature and settled Lewis’s ideas were at an early date. The soaring imagination that created Narnia and Perelandra is anchored in a unifying concept of who God is, who we are as his fallen creatures, the destiny of humankind, the need for redemption and perfection in Christ. Entry after entry reveals and amplifies this core through a range of applications. Regardless of the genre, his conservative and biblical center always holds.
A Few Technical Details
Here are the main criteria we used for selecting excerpts. A quotation should:
1. Contain an important idea that can be stated fully in a brief compass (keeping in view the first-time reader of a given Lewis work)
2. Be notable for its clarity, compression, profundity, wit, or vividness (not all are memorable, but most are in their own way remarkable)
3. Be helpful in establishing the reach of Lewis’s thought
4. Have interest because, given who he was, Lewis said it (especially true of excerpts about himself and his work)
The source of every quote is referenced. Lewis’s books have been published in many editions, and for any given book there is no standard or definitive edition. We have referenced the edition most commonly available. If our page numbers don’t match your copy, check the bibliography to determine which edition we used. Whenever practical, excerpts are cited with their chapter and paragraph numbers. This will help you locate a quotation in editions with different pagination. In Lewis’s fiction, where dialogue is in abundance, to cite the paragraph is not practical.
Establishing a date for the chronological arrangement was a bit complicated, but here was our method: Letters carry the date on which they were written. Books and essays carry the date of first publication (exceptions are noted). Addresses carry the date of presentation, when known. Poems carry the date of composition or first publication, if known, but you should be aware that many of Lewis’s poems were not published until after his death when Walter Hooper gathered them into a volume in 1964. Since the 1964 date could be misleading, poems whose date of composition is uncertain are flagged with the phrase 1st pub. 1964.
Essays, addresses, and poems are referenced from the collected edition.
Two of the books excerpted need special comment. Spenser’s Images of Life was written by Alastair Fowler (or edited,
as the title page has it) from Lewis’s lecture notes on Spenser. Since, as Fowler says in the preface, most of the ideas and some of the words in this book are from C. S. Lewis’s Cambridge lectures,
we thought it should be represented. Letters: C. S. Lewis/Don Giovanni Calabria, is quoted here in the English translation by Martin Moynihan. The original letters are in Latin, since that is the only language that Lewis and his Italian correspondent had in common.
The abbreviations in Lewis’s letters have been retained: cd. (could), shd. (should), wd. (would), wh. (which), yr. (your), and occasionally MS (manuscript), sc. (such), and Xtianity (Christianity). Lewis’s British spelling (including the omission of the period after titles such as Dr and Mr) has been retained. In the case of published letters, the misspellings and occasional inadvertent ungrammatical word forms are kept intact. Elsewhere we have silently corrected obvious typographical errors. We have used the American convention of placing commas and periods inside quotation marks. Excerpts that begin in the middle of a sentence begin with a capital and no ellipsis, and except in the rare cases in which an excerpt concludes with a sentence fragment, excerpts do not end with an ellipsis.
Welcome to the Feast!
Having specified the uniqueness and usefulness of this book, we hasten to add that we are keenly aware of the limitations inherent in any anthology. What is lost? From Lewis’s prose we lose his profoundly clear and logical chain of reasoning: his ability to probe behind assumptions, to argue from evidence to a reasoned conclusion. We lose the elegance of ideas consorting together in a great dance of harmonious thought. We lose the considerable force of words that begin to resonate in harmony with other words in a developing passage as Lewis so carefully crafts the whole, whose first sentence has the last in view.
And if our loss from the prose is great, it is greater from the fiction. It would be impossible in a few sentences or a paragraph to capture the passage from The Great Divorce where the angel kills the red lizard of lust that rides on the shoulder of one of the ghosts
from hell. Attempting to capture the flow of Eustace’s undragoning
in The Voyage of the Dawn Treader presents similar difficulties. The memorable conclusion of The Shoddy Lands
loses its punch when removed from its context. And who, having read The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, is not profoundly moved by the phrase, Aslan is on the move,
or Susan’s baffled and wishful cry after Aslan’s death and the great noise that followed: Is it more magic?
Aslan’s response, full of irony and poignancy, Yes! . . . It is more magic.
Yet how cold such phrases would be to those who have never read this most delightful and moving of books. Fiction depends so much on context, on the accretion of acts and words that constitute our feeling for the characters, their conflicts, and their defeats and conquests. While the fiction is indeed represented in this volume, devotees of Lewis’s imaginative work will be disappointed as we are at how little from the volumes of his shimmering fictional worlds is included here. As often happens even with the prose, some lines that seemed so profound when read in context fall flat when reread days later as mere excerpts. Those we omitted.
Anthologies, then, are certainly not substitutes for an author’s original works in their entirety; they leave so much out. Although many memorable and enlightening quotes may have been selected, they could never capture the sublime dignity of the whole. Lewis himself had a word to say on this business of excerpting a text when once engaged in such a task: The only use of selections is to deter those readers who will never appreciate the original, and thus to save them from wasting their time on it, and to send all the others on to the original as quickly as possible.
1 Reference to an anthology is not a substitute but an introduction, the appetizer that leads to the real feast.
This work has been a labor of love: a task worth doing in its own right. The journey through the Lewis canon has been for us a theological and liberal education of the first order. We hope for more readers of the complete works as a result of these excerpts. Our best wish for this book is that readers might exalt, not Lewis, but the God whose truth he explores and whose plans for the present creation and for human destiny satisfied Lewis’s rational mind, fed his capacious imagination, and filled his deepest longings.
Acknowledgments
We express our gratitude to Mrs. Jessie Root, who put on computer disk a great quantity of the manuscript and assisted in the proofing. We also acknowledge our gratitude to Dr. Wendell Hawley of Tyndale House Publishers for his encouragement of the project and to his able staff, especially Ken Petersen, who handled the computer needs, and Dan Elliott, who from his rich resources of energy and intelligence lavished every possible service as editor. No one could ask for a better team.
For his unfailing encouragement and for his extensive knowledge of Lewis and Lewis materials so willingly shared, we also owe a great debt of gratitude to Dr. Lyle Dorsett, director of the Marion E. Wade Center at Wheaton College, Wheaton, Illinois, and to his associates, Marjorie Mead—especially for her expertise on the photographs—and Virginia Kolb. We thank Diane Turner for her patience and expertise in providing valuable secretarial help.
We gratefully acknowledge Bob and Claire Knapp for their encouragement and assistance. We also thank our families for their sacrifices while the manuscript was being prepared. And, finally, we acknowledge the forbearance of Dr. Martindale’s students at Wheaton College and Rev. Root’s congregation at College Church in Wheaton for tolerating an unending stream of reference to Lewis in lectures and sermons!
Introduction
A book that is number one on the New York Times Best-seller List for several weeks may be all but forgotten a decade later. Popularity in a moment of history does not guarantee that a book will endure beyond its own time. C. S. Lewis once observed that, like fashions, the more up-to-date a book is, the sooner it is out of date. An era committed to information gathering (where newest is best) and keeping abreast of the trends is an era committed to obsolescence. We throw off what was important one moment because it is dated the next, and like a ship plowing through the sea, we leave a great wake behind us.
In light of this, more than idle curiosity leads us to question which books or authors will survive beyond their own time. We sense that our destiny and the contribution of our generation to coming generations is very much at issue. A quick survey of the Encyclopedia Britannica’s great books of the Western world reveals that an average of approximately three authors per century have been included in that august collection. This being so, what authors from this century will be read in the next? Of course, we can no more than guess; only time will tell. If votes are going to be cast, however, the name C. S. Lewis ought at least to be on the ballot. The influence of his pen can hardly be overestimated. One observer noted that Lewis is read with enormous affection and loyalty by a wide and diversified audience today. . . . In fact, more of his books are sold today than those of any other Christian writer in history.
2 Indeed, with over sixty of his books in print, Lewis has for many in this century become the dominant exponent and champion of thoughtful Christianity.
Lewis wrote on a wide variety of subjects in many literary forms. How can this vast array of work be characterized, and what accounts for its popularity? J. A. W. Bennett, a former student of Lewis’s at Oxford who later replaced him as professor of Medieval and Renaissance literature at Magdalen College, Cambridge, observed a remarkable unity within Lewis’s work:
The whole man was in all his judgements and activities, and a discriminating zest for life, for common life,
informs every page he wrote. Grete Clerke
as he was, he was never wilfully esoteric: Quotations and allusions rose unbidden to the surface of his full and fertile mind, but whether they are to Tristram Shandy or James Thurber they elucidate, not decorate. His works are all of a piece: a book in one genre will correct, illumine or amplify what is latent in another.3
This unity within Lewis’s writings grows from two sources: first, from an honest commitment to truth, and second, from his Christian faith. C. S. Lewis’s life was an echo of the great Socratic maxim that the unexamined life is not worth living.
Truth was to be pursued, and it was relevant to life. Lewis believed that life and thought were to conform to the plumb line of truth. Truth was not to be bent to fit either convenience or cultural and personal norms. Lewis wrote that In coming to understand anything we must reject the facts as they are for us in favor of the facts as they are.
Without this standard, one loses perspective, as if to believe that the railroad tracks actually narrowed the farther they were away.4 Lewis knew that breaking out of provincialism and the subjective dungeon of a perspective centered on self is critical to objectivity. Thought and life are amendable; reality is nonnegotiable. Lewis commented that one should "never ask of anything ‘Is it real?,’ for everything is real. The proper question is ‘A real what?’ e.g., a real snake or real delirium tremens?"5 Truth is discovered when thought conforms to reality. Honesty is critical, as Lewis wrote in his autobiography, Surprised by Joy:
What I like about experience is that it is such an honest thing. You may take any number of wrong turnings; but keep your eyes open and you will not be allowed to go very far before the warning signs appear. You may have deceived yourself, but experience is not trying to deceive you. The universe rings true wherever you fairly test it.6
This honest commitment to truth is a unifying factor in Lewis’s writings.
Lewis’s Christian faith is the other fundamental source of unity in his work. Unlike many who believe that the cardinal sin against objectivity is to have a point of view, Lewis was unashamed of his Christian frame of reference. From the time of his conversion, it was the integrating force behind his thought, life, and writing. He wrote, I believe in Christianity as I believe the sun is risen not only because I see it but because by it I see everything else.
7 This was the bedrock upon which Lewis’s work was built.
Christianity was not for Lewis a suitcase into which he crammed the facts of life, cutting here and snipping there until it all fit neatly into the preconceived package. On the contrary, the conclusions of Christianity were precisely what Lewis had hoped were not true. Writing in his autobiography of his reluctant conversion, he described himself as the prodigal who is brought kicking, struggling, resentful, and darting his eyes in every direction for a chance of escape.
8 Lewis didn’t find God; God found him. He continues:
The words compelle intrare, compel them to come in, have been so abused by wicked men that we shudder at them; but, properly understood, they plumb the depth of the Divine mercy. The hardness of God is kinder than the softness of men, and His compulsion is our liberation.9
With humility, Lewis recognized and submitted himself to the Reality at the core of the universe. The unifying Christian presuppositions that meet us in Lewis are reflective of what G. K. Chesterton wrote in the first chapter of Orthodoxy, which he titled, In defense of everything else
:
I have attempted in a vague and personal way . . . to state the philosophy in which I have come to believe. I will not call it my philosophy; for I did not make it. God and humanity made it; and it made me.10
Furthermore, Lewis was not reserved about either the influence Christianity had upon him or the influence he hoped his Christianity would have on others. Most of my books are evangelistic,
Lewis stated clearly when challenged on his apologetic writing,11 so there is no doubt about what Lewis is up to. But his thought must not be dismissed because he embraced Christianity and urges us to embrace it as well. To cry, Dogmatic!
is not a refutation. We should rather question, Is this the right point of view?
Lewis must be challenged on grounds of reason, not of emotion.
Lewis once complained:
Man is becoming as narrowly practical
as the irrational animals. In lecturing to popular audiences I have repeatedly found it almost impossible to make them understand that I recommended Christianity because I thought its affirmations to be objectively true. They are simply not interested in the question of truth or falsehood. They only want to know if it will be comforting, or inspiring,
or socially useful.12
Refreshingly, in reading Lewis one never feels him to be dogmatic, narrow-minded, doctrinaire, polemical. He is not grinding an axe; he is, pre-eminently, out to do us good. He sees the spiritual need of his fellow human beings, rightly assesses the general blindness to the dangers (both temporal and eternal) that lie in wait, and writes and lectures for all he’s worth to secure for others the blessings of salvation and the fullness of life in Christ. For this he uncomplainingly endured the snubs of his colleagues, who thought writing for the public to be beneath a scholar’s professional dignity. What St. Paul said of himself could be applied to Lewis: Though I am free from all men, I have made myself a servant to all, that I might win some
(1 Corinthians 9:19). His work not only rings of truth but peals forth charity. We sense in every book, article, and letter an author who genuinely and deeply cares for us—enough to tell us the unadulterated truth. Even if it hurts, he knows that it will ultimately heal.
The Christian religion . . . does not begin in comfort; it begins in . . . dismay. . . . In religion, as in war and everything else, comfort is the one thing you cannot get by looking for it. If you look for truth, you may find comfort in the end: If you look for comfort you will not get either comfort or truth—only soft soap and wishful thinking to begin with and, in the end, despair.13
As anyone who reads his books or browses in this anthology will readily see, though Lewis writes on a broad variety of subjects—from newspapers and nuclear war to heaven and hell—the unifying threads are honest commitment to truth and Christian faith on the one hand, and charity toward his reader on the other.
A
1
Absolute Values
[The Tao is] the doctrine of objective value, the belief that certain attitudes are really true, and others really false, to the kind of thing the universe is and the kind of things we are.
The Abolition of Man, chap. 1, para. 11, p. 29.
2
Absolute Values
If nothing is self-evident, nothing can be proved. Similarly, if nothing is obligatory for its own sake, nothing is obligatory at all.
The Abolition of Man, chap. 2, para. 11, p. 53.
3
Absolute Values
This thing which I have called for convenience the Tao, and which others may call Natural Law or Traditional Morality, . . . is not one among a series of possible systems of value. It is the sole source of all value judgements. If it is rejected, all value is rejected. If any value is retained, it is retained. The effort to refute it and raise a new system of value in its place is self-contradictory. There never has been, and never will be, a radically new judgement of value in the history of the world. What purport to be new systems or (as they now call them) ideologies,
all consist of fragments from the Tao itself, arbitrarily wrenched from their context in the whole and then swollen to madness in their isolation, yet still owing to the Tao and to it alone such validity as they possess. . . . The rebellion of new ideologies against the Tao is a rebellion of the branches against the tree: if the rebels could succeed they would find that they had destroyed themselves. The human mind has no more power of inventing a new value than of imagining a new primary colour, or, indeed, of creating a new sun and a new sky for it to move in.
The Abolition of Man, chap. 2, para. 14, pp. 56–57.
4
Absolute Values
Human nature will be the last part of Nature to surrender to Man. The battle will then be won. . . . But who, precisely, will have won it?
For the power of Man to make himself what he pleases means, as we have seen, the power of some men to make other men what they please. . . . Hitherto the plans of educationalists have achieved very little of what they attempted and indeed, when we read them—how Plato would have every infant a bastard nursed in a bureau,
and Elyot would have the boy see no men before the age of seven and, after that, no women, and how Locke wants children to have leaky shoes and no turn for poetry—we may well thank the beneficent obstinacy of real mothers, real nurses, and (above all) real children for preserving the human race in such sanity as it still possesses. But the man-moulders of the new age will be armed with the powers of an omnicompetent state and an irresistible scientific technique: we shall get at last a race of conditioners who really can cut out all posterity in what shape they please. . . .
The Conditioners, then, are to choose what kind of artificial Tao they will, for their own good reasons, produce in the Human race. . . .
It is not that they are bad men. They are not men at all. Stepping outside the Tao, they have stepped into the void. Nor are their subjects necessarily unhappy men. They are not men at all: they are artefacts. Man’s final conquest has proved to be the abolition of Man.
When all that says it is good
has been debunked, what says I want
remains. . . . The Conditioners, therefore, must come to be motivated simply by their own pleasure. . . . My point is that those who stand outside all judgements of value cannot have any ground for preferring one of their own impulses to another except the emotional strength of that impulse. . . .
At the moment, then, of Man’s victory over Nature, we find the whole human race subjected to some individual men, and those individuals subjected to that in themselves which is purely natural
—to their irrational impulses. Nature, untrammelled by values, rules the Conditioners and, through them, all humanity. Man’s conquest of Nature turns out, in the moment of its consummation, to be Nature’s conquest of Man.
The Abolition of Man, chap. 3, para. 5–10, pp. 72–80.
5
Absolute Values
Either we are rational spirit obliged for ever to obey the absolute values of the Tao, or else we are mere nature to be kneaded and cut into new shapes for the pleasures of masters who must, by hypothesis, have no motive but their own natural
impulses. Only the Tao provides a common human law of action which can overarch rulers and ruled alike. A dogmatic belief in objective value is necessary to the very idea of a rule which is not tyranny or an obedience which is not slavery.
The Abolition of Man, chap. 3, para. 13, pp. 84–85.
6
Addison, Joseph
[The] contrast between Addison and the Tories [Pope and Swift] comes out with special clarity in their treatment of enemies. For the Tories . . . all who have, in whatever fashion, incurred their ill will are knaves, scarecrows, whores, bugs, toads, bedlamites, yahoos; Addison himself a smooth Mephistopheles. It is good fun, but it is certainly not good sense; we laugh, and disbelieve. Now mark Addison’s procedure. . . . With the help of Steele, he invents Sir Roger de Coverley. The measure of his success is that we can now think of Sir Roger for a long time without remembering his Toryism; when we do remember it, it is only as a lovable whimsy. . . . The enemy, far from being vilified, is being turned into a dear old man. The thought that he could ever be dangerous has been erased from our minds; but so also the thought that anything he said could ever be taken seriously. We all love Sir Roger; but of course we do not really attend to him as we do—well, to Sir Andrew Freeport. All through the century which Addison ushered in, England was going to attend more and more seriously to the Freeports, and the de Coverleys were to be more and more effectually silenced. The figure of the dear old squire dominates—possibly, on some views, corrupts—the national imagination to the present day. This is indeed to make a man die sweetly.
That element in English society which stood against all that Addison’s party was bringing in is henceforth seen through a mist of smiling tenderness—as an archaism, a lovely absurdity. What we might have been urged to attack as a fortress we are tricked into admiring as a ruin.
Selected Literary Essays, Addison
(1945), para. 3, pp. 155–156.
7
Addison, Joseph
The essays [of Addison] do not invite criticism in terms of any very definite theology. They are everywhere pious.
Rational Piety, together with Polite Letters and Simplicity, is one of the hall-marks of the age which Addison was partly interpreting but partly also bringing into existence. And Rational Piety is by its very nature not very doctrinal. This is one of the many ways in which Addison is historically momentous. He ushers in that period—it is just now drawing to a close—in which it is possible to talk of piety
or (later) religion
almost in the abstract; in which the contrast is no longer between Christian and Pagan, the elect and the world, orthodox and heretic, but between religious
and irreligious.
The transition cannot be quite defined: absence of doctrine would have to become itself doctrinal for that to be possible. It is a change of atmosphere, which every reader of sensibility will feel if he passes suddenly from the literature of any earlier period to that of the eighteenth century.
Selected Literary Essays, Addison
(1945), para. 5, p. 157.
8
Addison, Joseph
The mention of Rochester suggests yet another gulf between Addison and the preceding age. We may be sure that Rochester’s manners lacked the simplicity
which the Whig essayists recommended. It is, of course, a commonplace that they addressed themselves to the reform of manners; but I sometimes wonder whether the very degree of their success does not conceal from us the greatness of the undertaking. I sometimes catch myself taking it for granted that the marks of good breeding were in all ages the same as they are today—that swagger was always vulgar, that a low voice, an unpretentious manner, a show (however superficial) of self-effacement, were always demanded. But it is almost certainly false. . . . Even to this day, when we meet foreigners (only think of some young Frenchmen) who have not been subjected to the Addisonian reform,
we have to make allowances
for them. . . . That sober code of manners under which we still live today, in so far as we have any code at all, and which foreigners call hypocrisy, is in some important degree a legacy from the Tattler and the Spectator.
Selected Literary Essays, Addison
(1945), para. 8, p. 160.
9
Addison, Joseph
I have not attempted to assess the value of Addison’s work, having wished rather to bring out its immense potency. He appears to be (as far as any individual can be) the source of a quite astonishing number of mental habits which were still prevalent when men now living were born. Almost everything which my own generation ignorantly called Victorian seems to have been expressed by Addison. . . . If he is not at present the most hated of our writers, that can only be because he is so little read. Everything the moderns detest, all that they call smugness, complacency, and bourgeois ideology, is brought together in his work and given its most perfect expression.
And certainly, if it were at all times true that the Good is the enemy of the Best, it would be hard to defend Addison. His Rational Piety, his smiling indulgence to the fair sex,
his small idealisms about trade, certainly fall short of actual Christianity, and plain justice to women, and true political wisdom. They may even be obstacles to them. . . . I believe he could defend himself. He is not attempting to write sermons or philosophy, only essays. . . . All we can justly say is that his essays are rather small beer; there is no iron in them as in Johnson; they do not stir the depths.
. . . I do not think Addison’s popularity is likely to return; but something to fill the same place in life will always be needed—some tranquil middle ground of quiet sentiments and pleasing melancholies and gentle humour to come in between our restless idealisms and our equally restless dissipations. Do we not after all detect in the charge of smugness and complacency the note of envy? Addison is, above all else, comfortable. He is not on that account to be condemned. He is an admirable cure for the fidgets.
Selected Literary Essays, Addison
(1945), para. 17–19, pp. 166–168.
10
Adoration
It is better to see the Lion and die than to be Tisroc of the world and live and not to have seen him.
The Last Battle, chap. 15, p. 164.
11
Adoration
Pleasures are shafts of the glory as it strikes our sensibility. . . .
But aren’t there bad, unlawful pleasures? Certainly there are. But in calling them bad pleasures
I take it we are using a kind of shorthand. We mean pleasures snatched by unlawful acts.
It is the stealing of the apple that is bad, not the sweetness. The sweetness is still a beam from the glory. That does not palliate the stealing. It makes it worse. There is sacrilege in the theft. We have abused a holy thing.
I have tried, since that moment, to make every pleasure into a channel of adoration. I don’t mean simply by giving thanks for it. One must of course give thanks, but I mean something different. How shall I put it?
We can’t—or I can’t—hear the song of a bird simply as a sound. Its meaning or message (That’s a bird
) comes with it inevitably. . . . This heavenly fruit is instantly redolent of the orchard where it grew. This sweet air whispers of the country from whence it blows. It is a message. We know we are being touched by a finger of that right hand at which there are pleasures for evermore. There need be no question of thanks or praise as a separate event, something done afterwards. To experience the tiny theophany is itself to adore.
Gratitude exclaims, very properly, How good of God to give me this.
Adoration says, What must be the quality of that Being whose far-off and momentary coruscations are like this!
One’s mind runs back up the sunbeam to the sun. . . .
I don’t always achieve it. One obstacle is inattention. Another is the wrong kind of attention. One could, if one practised, hear simply a roar and not the roaring-of-the-wind. In the same way, only far too easily, one can concentrate on the pleasure as an event in one’s own nervous system—subjectify it—and ignore the smell of Deity that hangs about it. A third obstacle is greed. Instead of saying This also is Thou,
one may say the fatal word Encore. There is also conceit: the dangerous reflection that not everyone can find God in a plain slice of bread and butter, or that others would condemn as simply grey
the sky in which I am delightedly observing such delicacies of pearl and dove and silver.
You notice that I am drawing no distinction between sensuous and aesthetic pleasures. But why should I? The line is almost impossible to draw and what use would it be if one succeeded in drawing it?
If this is Hedonism, it is also a somewhat arduous discipline. But it is worth some labour: for in so far as it succeeds, almost every day furnishes us with, so to speak, bearings
on the Bright Blur. It becomes brighter but less blurry.
Letters to Malcolm: Chiefly on Prayer, chap. 17, para. 4–8, 10–12, pp. 89–91.
12
Adoration
We—or at least I—shall not be able to adore God on the highest occasions if we have learned no habit of doing so on the lowest. At best, our faith and reason will tell us that He is adorable, but we shall not have found Him so, not have tasted and seen.
Any patch of sunlight in a wood will show you something about the sun which you could never get from reading books on astronomy. These pure and spontaneous pleasures are patches of Godlight
in the woods of our experience.
Letters to Malcolm: Chiefly on Prayer, chap. 17, para. 13, p. 91.
13
Adulthood
Critics who treat adult as a term of approval, instead of as a merely descriptive term, cannot be adult themselves. To be concerned about being grown up, to admire the grown up because it is grown up, to blush at the suspicion of being childish; these things are the marks of childhood and adolescence. And in childhood and adolescence they are, in moderation, healthy symptoms. Young things ought to want to grow. But to carry on into middle life or even into early manhood this concern about being adult is a mark of really arrested development. When I was ten, I read fairy tales in secret and would have been ashamed if I had been found doing so. Now that I am fifty I read them openly. When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up.
Of Other Worlds: Essays and Stories, On Three Ways of Writing for Children
(1952), para. 9, p. 25.
14
Advice
We never have followed the advice of the great teachers. Why are we likely to begin now? Why are we more likely to follow Christ than any of the others? Because He is the best moral teacher? But that makes it even less likely that we shall follow Him. If we cannot take the elementary lessons, is it likely we are going to take the most advanced one? If Christianity only means one more bit of good advice, then Christianity is of no importance. There has been no lack of good advice for the last four thousand years. A bit more makes no difference.
Mere Christianity, bk. IV, chap. 1, para. 6, p. 137.
15
Affection
We can say anything to one another.
The truth behind this is that Affection at its best can say whatever Affection at its best wishes to say, regardless of the rules that govern public courtesy; for Affection at its best wishes neither to wound nor to humiliate nor to domineer. . . . You may tease and hoax and banter. You can say Shut up. I want to read.
You can do anything in the right tone and at the right moment—the tone and moment which are not intended to, and will not, hurt. The better the Affection the more unerringly it knows which these are (every love has its art of love). But the domestic Rudesby means something quite different when he claims liberty to say anything.
Having a very imperfect sort of Affection himself, or perhaps at that moment none, he arrogates to himself the beautiful liberties which only the fullest Affection has a right to or knows how to manage. He then uses them spitefully in obedience to his resentments; or ruthlessly in obedience to his egoism; or at best stupidly, lacking the art. And all the time he may have a clear conscience. He knows that Affection takes liberties. He is taking liberties. Therefore (he concludes) he is being affectionate. Resent anything and he will say that the defect of love is on your side. He is hurt. He has been misunderstood.
He then sometimes avenges himself by getting on his high horse and becoming elaborately polite.
The implication is of course, Oh! So we are not to be intimate? We are to behave like mere acquaintances? I had hoped—but no matter. Have it your own way.
The Four Loves, chap. 3, para. 26–27, pp. 68–69.
16
Affection
Change is a threat to Affection.
. . . Affection is the most instinctive, in that sense the most animal, of the loves; its jealousy is proportionately fierce. It snarls and bares its teeth like a dog whose food has been snatched away. . . .
Boy, boy, these wild courses of yours will break your mother’s heart.
That eminently Victorian appeal may often have been true. Affection was bitterly wounded when one member of the family fell from the homely ethos into something worse—gambling, drink, keeping an opera girl. Unfortunately it is almost equally possible to break your mother’s heart by rising above the homely ethos. The conservative tenacity of affection works both ways. It can be a domestic counterpart to that nationally suicidal type of education which keeps back the promising child because the idlers and dunces might be hurt
if it were undemocratically moved into a higher class than themselves.
The Four Loves, chap. 3, para. 28–29, 33, pp. 70–71, 73.
17
Affection
Affection is responsible for nine-tenths of whatever solid and durable happiness there is in our natural lives.
The Four Loves, chap. 3, para. 43, p. 80.
18
Affection
Affection produces happiness if—and only if—there is common sense and give and take and decency.
In other words, only if something more, and other, than Affection is added. The mere feeling is not enough. . . . There is no disguising the fact that this means goodness; patience, self-denial, humility, and the continual intervention of a far higher sort of love than Affection, in itself, can ever be. That is the whole point. If we try to live by Affection alone, Affection will go bad on us.
. . . It was of erotic love that the Roman poet said, I love and hate,
but other kinds of love admit the same mixture. They carry in them the seeds of hatred. If Affection is made the absolute sovereign of a human life the seeds will germinate. Love, having become a god, becomes a demon.
The Four Loves, chap. 3, para. 45–46, pp. 81–83.
19
Aging
I have had neuralgia to-day but am otherwise alright—except for rheumatism which has prevented me from sleeping on my right side for nearly a year now. (What a series of rediscoveries life is. All the things which one used to regard as simply the nonsense grown-ups talk have one by one come true—draughts, rheumatism, Christianity. The best one of all remains to be verified.)
The Letters of C. S. Lewis to Arthur Greeves (10 December 1942), p. 494.
20
Aging
Youth and age touch only the surface of our lives.
That Hideous Strength, chap. 1, section 3, p. 21.
21
Aging
Funny to think we’re both elderly, isn’t it? And what a sham this business of age is. Do you (except physically) feel older than when we saw the hedge pig and played gramophone records to one another? I don’t a bit. My own pupils still seem to me in many ways older than I. Indeed (nice men as many of them are) I am a little worried by the fact that so few of them seem ever to have had youth as we had it. They have all read all the correct, important
books: they seem to have no private & erratic imaginative adventures of their own. (I suppose the explanation is that I am the last person who is likely to hear of such things even where they exist. I mean, with me they’re all talking grown-up
as hard as they can. Yet I don’t know: the modern world is so desperately serious. They have a taste for books of information.
)
The Letters of C. S. Lewis to Arthur Greeves (5 January 1947), p. 509.
22
Aging
Yes, I too think there is lots to be said for being no longer young; and I do most heartily agree that it is just as well to be past the age when one expects or desires to attract the other sex. It’s natural enough in our species, as in others, that the young birds should show off their plumage—in the mating season. But the trouble in the modern world is that there’s a tendency to rush all the birds on to that age as soon as possible and then keep them there as late as possible, thus losing all the real value of the other parts of life in a senseless, pitiful attempt to prolong what, after all, is neither its wisest, its happiest, or most innocent period. I suspect merely commercial motives are behind it all: for it is at the showing-off age that birds of both sexes have least sales-resistance!
Letters to an American Lady (1 August 1953), pp. 19–20.
23
Aging
People [have] no particular ages in Aslan’s country. Even in this world, of course, it is the stupidest children who are most childish and the stupidest grown-ups who are most grown-up.
The Silver Chair, chap. 16, p. 212.
24
Aging
We must both, I’m afraid, recognise that, as we grow older, we become like old cars—more and more repairs and replacements are necessary. We must just look forward to the fine new machines (latest Resurrection model) which are waiting for us, we hope, in the Divine garage!
Letters to an American Lady (30 September 1958), p. 78.
25
Aging
As for wrinkles—pshaw! Why shouldn’t we have wrinkles? Honorable insignia of long service in this warfare.
Letters to an American Lady (30 October 1958), p. 79.
26
Aging
We must beware of the Past, mustn’t we? I mean that any fixing of the mind on old evils beyond what is absolutely necessary for repenting our own sins and forgiving those of others is certainly useless and usually bad for us. Notice in Dante that the lost souls are entirely concerned with their past! Not so the