Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Death in the Stocks
Death in the Stocks
Death in the Stocks
Ebook320 pages5 hours

Death in the Stocks

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

"Death in the Stocks is rare and refreshing."—The Times

A Moonlit Night, a Sleeping Village, and an Unaccountable Murder...

In the dead of the night, a man in an evening dress is found murdered, locked in the stocks on the village green. Unfortunately for Superintendent Hannasyde, the deceased is Andrew Vereker, a man hated by nearly everyone, especially his odd and unhelpful family members. The Verekers are as eccentric as they are corrupt, and it will take all Hannasyde's skill at detection to determine who's telling the truth, and who is pointing him in the wrong direction. The question is: who in this family is clever enough to get away with murder?

"Miss Heyer's characters act and speak with an ease and conviction that is refreshing as it is rare in the ordinary mystery novel."—Times Literary Supplement

LanguageEnglish
PublisherSourcebooks
Release dateOct 1, 2009
ISBN9781402227776
Death in the Stocks
Author

Georgette Heyer

Georgette Heyer (1902-1974) was an English writer of historical romance and detective fiction. Born in London, Heyer was raised as the eldest of three children by a distinguished British Army officer and a mother who excelled as a cellist and pianist at the Royal College of Music. Encouraged to read from a young age, she began writing stories at 17 to entertain her brother Boris, who suffered from hemophilia. Impressed by her natural talent, Heyer’s father sought publication for her work, eventually helping her to release The Black Moth (1921), a detective novel. Heyer then began publishing her stories in various magazines, establishing herself as a promising young voice in English literature. Following her father’s death, Heyer became responsible for the care of her brothers and shortly thereafter married mining engineer George Ronald Rougier. In 1926, Heyer publisher her second novel, These Old Shades, a work of historical romance. Over the next several decades, she published consistently and frequently, excelling with romance and detective stories and establishing herself as a bestselling author.

Read more from Georgette Heyer

Related to Death in the Stocks

Titles in the series (12)

View More

Related ebooks

Related articles

Reviews for Death in the Stocks

Rating: 3.65878374054054 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

296 ratings27 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Rather clever vintage British mystery
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Not bad, not a favorite. A plethora of highly annoying characters - good thing it was Superintendent Hannasyde and not me dealing with them, I'd have arrested most of them out of pure exasperation. Silly people quite convinced that they couldn't possibly be misinterpreted or accused...However, the only one who was really unsympathetic turned out to be the murderer, which is...weak (though it's possible I felt that character was totally unsympathetic primarily because of a faint memory of a previous read of the book). And Heyer's obsession (reasonable, of course, in a primarily romance author) with pairing people off by the end of the book got just a trifle annoying here. I do like Hannasyde, the mystery/ies are interesting (if somewhat sordid), and there are a few characters I liked (and more I enjoyed, when I wasn't exasperated with them). But not a favorite. And the rushed ending feels like Heyer was still getting her feet under her in the mystery genre.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Nothing can be said about the plot without giving away the solution,NOTE: I read this series in the order 3, 2, 1; but it doesn't make any difference, although #2 does reference the case in #1.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This was a fun listen. It feels as if it is set in the 20s, and focuses on a family that is well to do. Antonia and Kenneth's half brother Arthur is discovered sitting in the stocks on the village green and stabbed. There are more possible motives than you can shake a stick at, pretty much any of them could have done it. My money was on the black sheep brother, Roger, who was believed dead for 7 years but turns up just in time to inherit a mine and rather a lot of dosh in one go. Unfortunately he turns up dead as well, so that was the end of that theory. The crime is investigated by Inspector Hannerside and by the family's solicitor, Giles Carrington. Hannerside puts in some solid detective work but he's hardly helped by the eccentricity of the family themselves. They were generally difficult and too clever for their own good, with Giles struggling to keep them all on the straight & narrow. It all turns out well enough and as the first in the series, I imagine I'll be back for more.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    When Arnold Vereker, a "weekender" with a cottage nearby, is found murdered, propped up in the stocks at Ashleigh Green, the local police know that it's a case for Scotland Yard. As Inspector Hannasyde soon discovers, the deceased was rather unpopular with his family, and suspicion soon falls on Kenneth Vereker, the artistic half-brother of the victim, whose outrageous antics seem designed to provoke. The only problem? Hannasyde isn't convinced that Kenneth is the murderer...I was relieved to find Death in the Stocks so much more enjoyable than No Wind of Blame, the only other Georgette Heyer mystery I have read to date, as I would be very reluctant to abandon my project of reading Heyer's entire oeuvre, and equally displeased at the prospect of suffering through ten more tedious novels. Happily, this time I found the narrative engaging and the characters amusing. The exchanges between Kenneth and his sister Tony (Anotonia) had that Heyer flair, so lacking in No Wind of Blame. I can't say, in all honesty, that I found Death in the Stocks terribly suspenseful, as I guessed the solution almost from the beginning, but I did care about what happened to the characters, and that made a big difference. On another note, it is pure luck that I picked up these two titles first, as they happen to be the first books in Heyer's two ongoing series about their respective sleuths, Inspector Hannasyde and Inspector Hemingway. I had no notion of this, when selecting them, but am certainly glad that it chanced to be so.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This was an excellent mystery story. When Arnold Vereker's body is found locked in the village stocks the main suspects are his family. I did find the Vereker family a bit annoying and stupid at times, but on the other hand they were quite realistic with real flaws. The whole book is basically the Verekers discussing how each of them could have been the murderer and it seemed like they were all trying to protect each other by making false statements and confessions.As the book drew to a close I was convinced I knew who the killer was, but the real killer was a huge surprise!This book was a great cozy mystery and I'd recommend it to anyone who enjoys mysteries that are a bit light-hearted.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The first of the Hannayside/Hemingway books -- it doesn't have enough of Sergeant Hemingway for my tastes :(As for the plot, Heyer gives the reader pointers to who is the guilty party but she holds back the final proofs (a bit 'unfair' to my mind). I did enjoy the Vereker siblings' squabbles!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Humour interspersed with strong characters and a plot that keeps us guessing until the end. Enjoyable.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The third, and best so far, of Heyer's mysteries I've read. Thoroughly unlikeable bunch of characters, but a good potboiling plot.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I am terrible with names, which is why I spent several chapters waiting for Peter Wimsey to make an appearance. Eventually I realised that, whereas Heyer may or may not rhyme with Sayers, they are not in fact the same author. Fortunately by then I was already well enough engaged with the characters that I wasn't too disappointed by this.Brother and sister are entertainingly blase about the whole mess they're playing with. I'm surprised it took their cousin so long to suspect the eventual arrestee, as I'd been aiming that way all along. The motive seemed obvious, though perhaps I was especially suspicious because none of the characters ever raised them as a possibility: dead giveaway.Anyway, a pleasant read, and everyone ended up in love with the people they ought to be in love with, so that worked out too.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    I don't know about this author: other than the police most of her characters are ghastly & loathsome and what's worse is their dialog is outrageously affected and totally phony! Another thing, is Heyer tends to make not-so-subtle jabs at Agatha Christie, which would be fine, except Heyer isn't 1/10 as good of a mystery writer as Dame Agatha.... Plot: A rich man, Arthur, is found stabbed to death in the local town's stocks. His 1/2 sister & brother are totally inappropriate about his murder going on about how they didn't like him, how each of them might have done it, playing games w/ the police. The 1/2 sister, Antonia (Tony) is engaged to the man who was embezzling from Arthur (the two men having a loud quarrel prior to the murder) and the 1/2 brother, Kenneth, is engaged to a Gold-Digger who knew Arthur. Everyone is thrilled that Kenneth is heir and will soon be rich, until.....Enter the long lost full brother of Arthur, Roger, who turns up dead as well; murder made to look like suicide.There were a few clues scattered about to tell who-done-it; which I actually picked up on.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Entertaining.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Superintendent Hannasyde is called in to investigate when a man's body is found in a village stocks. Andrew Vereker, is the dead man and unfortunately for the police not a well liked man, so there seems to be many suspects especially in his family.
    Unfortunately most of the story related to the suspects and not the police procedures, and I did actually work out the guilty party. Overall it was an enjoyable read but I did find most of the characters so annoying I hoped that they would all be found guilty of murder.
    A NetGalley Book
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Georgette Heyer competes unfairly with herself when she leaves the Regency Romance genre. Her humor burns bright in this book, but there just isn't enough fast paced action. I found myself getting bored and in the end, she doesn't answer the question of exactly how it was done--though I suppose it was implied. I knew who had "dunnit" very early on simply by process of elimination. All Heyer's straw men were knocked down too quickly. However, I will read Country House murders now that they have been republished as kindle books.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A thoroughly enjoyable read, with witty, flippant characters, unexpected twists, plenty of suspects, and a romance. Read it on a lazy Sunday afternoon. For those readers who love Heyer (and this cozy historical mystery genre, set in England), try Dianne Freeman's books, beginning with *A Lady’s Guide to Etiquette and Murder.*
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I like Hannasyde. He's so laid back.

    Heyer writes such digestible, tasty work.

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5

    Yes, well, it's fair to say that Georgette Heyer was not the world's best mystery writer and the plotting in this one is not particularly strong. (I say this because I guessed the culprit early in the piece. It was just a process of elimination, as there weren't that many suspects to choose from!) But I still enjoyed listening to the audiobook of this novel. Most of the characters are unlikeable, but they are quite funny. I loved their in-depth discussions about how they could have been the murderer. I also loved Roger: he reminded me of one of the stock characters in Georgette Heyer's Regency romances: the disreputable but entertaining younger brother. I don't think Heyer's mysteries are anything like as good as her Regency romances, but for someone who grew up reading and loving those romances - or for someone with an interest in period mysteries - they still make rewarding reading.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    What a fun, interesting mystery. Although I'd guessed fairly early on who must have dunnit, still, the characterization of the suspects was truly deep and intriguing, and often quite funny. Dialogue was quick and sparkling. I'll definitely continue this series.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A wealthy mine owner is found dead in a little village. It's a neat crime that leaves even Scotland Yard all at sea. When a man has had many enemies and no one seems to moan him nobody is a fit suspect. But then there is motive and detective Hannasyde has his hands full trying to prove a member of Vereker's family guilty.It's a rather typical who-done-it mystery, with quite enough dust thrown, not only in the investigators' eyes but in the eyes of the reader as well. I thought the plot was quite good, but the characters were rather irritating. None of them were in the least endearing nor worthy of sympathy. The only character that showed any promise of being interesting turned out to have rather a back-seat role. I refer to Hannasyde. The blurb, I think, is rather misleading as it suggests Hannasyde to have a role pretty much like Hercule Poirot or Miss Marple. Georgette Heyer's wit is spread rather liberally through out the mystery, but while this particular brand of with works very well with her Regency Romances, it seems rather out of place in this setting. The characters, almost all of them, are rather flippant and careless in all that they do and say (which makes them all suspect), and, personally, I was very sceptical about their attitude toward the whole case. Many instances seemed realistically improbable.Nevertheless, Death in the Stocks was an interesting enough read. If you like to wonder and guess, it's a good story. After reading many of it's kind one becomes adept at guessing who the murderer would be right from the start, but this one kept me guessing almost till the end.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A quick read from the light detective genre. The two main characters get a little tiresome at times with their endless clever-clever remarks, but the book keeps your interest to the end.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Georgette Heyer mysteries never disappoint me, and this one is no exception. Intelligent, and witty, with just the right hint of sarcasm.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Arnold Vereker is found dead in the stocks on Ashleigh Green, the victim of a knife wound. Suspicion quickly turns to his half-brother, half-sister, and to an employee of his company. All disliked him and had the opportunity to do so, but their stories are not convincing and leave Supt. Hannasyde and family attorney Giles Carrington with more questions than answers. With so many lies, it is hard to sort out the truth. There are a few surprises along the way, but eventually the culprit is found. Well-plotted. The family is so eccentric that the reader (at times) hopes all of them are all guilty.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Excellent mystery, not too dated (original 1935). Writer is playing fair without giving too much away. Very well-plotted, good characters who are fun to read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    An entertaining murder mystery. Arnold Vereker is found dead on the village green locked in the stocks (hence the title). A thoroughly unpleasant man suspicion falls on his immediate family, his entertainingly eccentric half-brother and sister, Kenneth and Antonia (Tony). Several plot twists and red herrings, all deliciously interspersed with Hannasyde's encounters with the madly eccentric Vereker family, the murder is resolved. Perfect.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    If you would like to finish out your year with a funny, entertaining, cozy mystery, then once again I have a very nice Georgette Heyer book to offer for your consideration. In the very early hours of the morning, the body of a dead man, dressed in evening clothes, is found on the village green, his feet in the stocks. The murdered man turns out to be the wealthy weekend visitor Andrew Vereker, and once police start to investigate the crime they soon determine that there are many people who, for various reasons, are not unhappy to find that Vereker has been sent on to his just rewards. Relatives, soon to be in-laws, business associates...all whom it seems greatly disliked the dead man and none of whom have an alibi. The very clever Superintendent Hannasyde is called in to solve the crime and he certainly has his work cut out for him with this cast of characters. Lucky for us, there is a lot of very funny and entertaining goings on for us to enjoy as that is accomplished.Once again, as with the previous two Heyer mysteries that I have reviewed, I can totally recommend Death In The Stocks to fans of the genre, especially if you are a fan of these sort of English country house mysteries. I am not totally convinced if the culture she describes in her books ever really existed, and surely it does not now, some 60 or more years later, but it certainly is very entertaining. Heyer is the queen of witty, funny dialogue and the queen still reigns here. Great characters and great dialogue is what she excels at. If you have read and enjoyed the mysteries of Agatha Christie or Dorothy Sayer and are not familiar with the perhaps lesser known Heyer, you need to check her out and Death In the Stocks is a great place to start. I also must mention once again...because I love to repeat myself when I say something true...that I just love the look and feel and quality of these editions reissued by Sourcebooks. They are some of the nicest, high quality paperbacks that I have ever read. If you are looking for a nice cozy to cozy up to on a cold winter night, perhaps with a cuppa tea and a slice of fruitcake, run out and grab yourself a Heyer!
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I thought this mystery was very different from the previous Heyer mystery (No Wind of Blame). I seemed to have enjoyed this one more as both Antonia and Kenneth were so quirky and eccentric they got me into fits of giggles because they were just so annoying to Hannasyde. However the plot still kept me guessing. They were eccentric and funny yet there’s an underlying almost sinister like quality that made you think: just because they’re joking about it doesn’t mean they didn’t really kill Arnold Vereker…right? and you’re left with that uncertainity that made the jokes and comedy a little on the uneasy side. It really added more to the mystery and gave it a flavor of a black comedy to it.Each character had their own motive, and their own unique personality. I like Antonia for her quirky personality and her maddening ability to annoy the police. Kenneth was the same although I didn’t like him as much because there’s an arrogant disposition surrounding his personality which seems to put me off. I would say, this book is more of a laid back mystery. There wasn’t much suspense, no thrills or chills. Yet my curiousity was so piqued because of these interesting characters I really did want to know who did it. However be warned, there is a bit of surprise bomb towards the end of the book which caught me by surprise and I was left still guessing who did the crime. However, my guess was correct and although it wasn’t a surprise to me, it was nice to see I guessed right! I’d have to say it was not predictable though, how they solved the crime was totally not how I pictured which is good, I don’t like predictability in books.The only criticism in this book was, I found it to drag a little, with the banter between Kenneth and Antonia. It almost ruined their quirkiness and it almost got the point where they were starting to annoy me just a little bit. The plot could have moved a little more faster and although the crime was solved, it was a little too quick and it ending seemed rather abrupt. Other than those few points, I enjoyed reading the book and would read her other crime novels.Overall, an interesting mystery with a dash of comedy to keep things interesting. Its’ characters are certainly memorable and worth reading into.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Highly praised by Barzun & Taylor, but, to me, both flaccid and frivolous. As usual with Heyer, a collection of exasperating characters, including the police superintendent Hannasyde, who seems to have something wrong with his eyes -- they are always oscillating from being "keen" to "amused" to "twinkling" to "knowing" (must be cataracts). Then, half way through, the most preposterous character of all comes on stage and is thoroughly entertaining. Also, generally typical of Heyer, the culprit is all too clear, all to early. Only in A Blunt Instrument does she succeed in surprising.

Book preview

Death in the Stocks - Georgette Heyer

ALSO BY GEORGETTE HEYER

Behold, Here’s Poison

A Blunt Instrument

Detection Unlimited

Duplicate Death

Envious Casca

Footsteps in the Dark

No Wind of Blame

Penhallow

They Found Him Dead

The Unfinished Clue

Why Shoot a Butler?

Thank you for downloading this Sourcebooks eBook!

You are just one click away from…

• Being the first to hear about author happenings

• VIP deals and steals

• Exclusive giveaways

• Free bonus content

• Early access to interactive activities

• Sneak peeks at our newest titles

Happy reading!

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP

Books. Change. Lives.

Copyright © 1935 by Georgette Rougier

Cover and internal design © 2019 by Sourcebooks, Inc.

Cover design by Eileen Carey

Cover image © The Advertising Archives, McKevin/Getty Images, Bloodlinewolf/iStock

Sourcebooks and the colophon are registered trademarks of Sourcebooks, Inc.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means including information storage and retrieval systems—except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews—without permission in writing from its publisher, Sourcebooks, Inc.

The characters and events portrayed in this book are fictitious or are used fictitiously. Any similarity to real persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental and not intended by the author.

Published by Sourcebooks Landmark, an imprint of Sourcebooks, Inc.

P.O. Box 4410, Naperville, Illinois 60567-4410

(630) 961-3900

Fax: (630) 961-2168

sourcebooks.com

Originally published in Great Britain in 1935 by Longmans, Green & Co., Ltd. This edition issued based on the paperback edition published in 2009 by Sourcebooks Landmark, an imprint of Sourcebooks, Inc.

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is on file with the publisher.

Contents

Front Cover

Title Page

Copyright

One

Two

Three

Four

Five

Six

Seven

Eight

Nine

Ten

Eleven

Twelve

Thirteen

Fourteen

Fifteen

Sixteen

Seventeen

Eighteen

Nineteen

Twenty

Twenty-One

Twenty-Two

An Excerpt from They Found Him Dead

About the Author

Back Cover

One

It was past midnight, and the people who lived in the cottages that clustered round the triangular green had long since gone to bed and to sleep. No lamp shone in any window, but a full moon sailed in a sky the colour of sapphires, and lit the village with a pale light, as cold as the sheen on steel. Trees and houses cast grotesque shadows, black as soot; every object in the moonlight stood out sharply defined, but without colour, so that even a prosaic line of petrol pumps looked a little ghostly.

There was a car drawn up at one end of the green, its headlights throwing two golden beams ahead, and its engine throbbing softly. One of its doors stood open. Something moved in the shadow of the great elm tree beside the car; a man stepped into the moonlight, glanced this way and that, as though fearful of seeing someone, and after a moment’s hesitation got quickly into the car and began to turn it, jarring his gears a little. He looked once towards the elm tree, at some object dimly discernible in the shadow, and then, having swung the car right round, drove away up the London road. The noise of his engine died slowly in the distance; somewhere at hand a watch-dog barked once, and then was silent.

The shadow of the elm tree was shortening as the moon travelled across the sky: the eerie light seemed to steal under the branches, and presently shone on two feet in patent-leather shoes, stuck through the holes in a pair of stocks. The feet remained motionless, and as the moonlight crept nearer the glimmer of a white shirt-front showed.

An hour later a cyclist rounded the bend in the road by the King’s Head. Police-Constable Dickenson was returning home from a night patrol. The moonlight now fully illuminated the stocks. A gentleman in evening-dress was sitting in them, apparently asleep, for his body had sagged forward, his head lolling on his chest. Police-Constable Dickenson was whistling softly as he rode, but the whistle stopped suddenly, and the front wheel of the bicycle swerved. The stocks were a feature of Ashleigh Green, but the Constable could not remember having seen anyone imprisoned in them before. It gave him quite a turn. Tight as an owl, he thought. Looks like somebody’s been having a game with you, my lad.

He got off his bicycle, and pushed it on to the grass and carefully propped it against the elm tree. The figure on the bench did not move. ‘Now then, sir, wake up!’ said the Constable, kind but reproving. ‘Can’t spend the night here, you know!’ He laid his hand on the sagging shoulder, and gave it a slight shake. ‘Come along, sir, you’ll be better off at home, you will.’ There was no response, and he shook the shoulder rather harder, and put one arm round the man to hoist him. There was still no response, but an arm which had lain across its owner’s knees was dislodged, and hung dangling, the hand brushing limply against the Constable’s trousers. The Constable bent, peering into the downcast face, and sought in his pocket for his torch. The light flashed on, and the Constable stepped back rather quickly. The figure on the bench, disturbed by his shaking, toppled over sideways, its feet still held in the stocks.

‘Gawd!’ whispered Police-Constable Dickenson, feeling his mouth to be very dry all at once. ‘Oh Gawd!’ He did not want to touch the figure again, or even to go nearer, because there was something sticky on his hands, and he had never seen a dead man before.

He stooped, and rubbed his hand on the grass, telling himself he was a proper softy. But he hadn’t been expecting it, and his stomach had kind of turned over. Made a chap feel sick for a minute; it was like as if one’s innards took a jump into one’s chest. Breathing a little jerkily he went up to the figure again, and ran his torch over it, and rather gingerly touched one of the slack hands. It wasn’t exactly cold, not clammy, like you read about in books, but just cool. He didn’t know but that he wouldn’t rather it had been icy. That faint warmth was nasty, somehow.

He pulled himself up. It wasn’t his job to get fanciful, but to make up his mind what was the right thing for him to do first. The man was dead, sure enough; it was no use standing over the body: he’d better get on to the Police Station at Hanborough as soon as possible. He pushed his bicycle back on to the road, mounted it again, and rode swiftly along to the other end of the green to the cottage with the prim muslin curtains and the tidy flowerbeds which had County Police painted on a narrow board over the front door.

He let himself in and made his way to the telephone, taking care to tread softly so that his wife, who was asleep upstairs, should not wake and call to him to go up. He’d have to tell her what had happened if she did, and she was expecting her first, and none too well.

He lifted the receiver, wondering whether he’d done the right thing after all, leaving a corpse stuck down in the middle of the village. Didn’t seem decent, somehow.

The Station-Sergeant’s voice spoke. He was surprised to hear his own voice so steady, because he really felt a bit shaken, and no wonder. He told his story as matter-of-factly as he could, and the Sergeant, not nearly so phlegmatic, said first: ‘What?’ and then: ‘In the stocks?’ and lastly: ‘Look here, are you sure he’s dead?’

Police-Constable Dickenson was quite sure, and when the Sergeant heard about the blood, and the wound in the back, he stopped making incredulous exclamations and said briefly: ‘All right. You cut along and see no one touches the body. The Inspector will be down with the ambulance in a couple of shakes.’

‘Hold on a minute, Sergeant,’ said the Constable, anxious to give all the information he could. ‘It isn’t a stranger. I was able to identify him – it’s Mr Vereker.’

‘Mr Who?’ demanded the Sergeant.

‘Vereker. The gentleman from London, as bought Riverside Cottage. You know, Sergeant: comes down week-ends.’

‘Oh!’ said the Sergeant, rather vaguely. ‘Not a local man.’

‘Not properly speaking,’ agreed the Constable. ‘But what beats me is how he came to be sitting in them stocks at this hour of night. He’s in evening-dress, what’s more.’

‘Well, you get back, and keep your eye on things till the Inspector comes along,’ said the Sergeant, and hung up the receiver.

Constable Dickenson heard the click of it, and was rather sorry, because now that he had had time to recover from his first amazement he could see several queer things about the murder, and would have liked to have talked them over with the Sergeant. But there was nothing for it but to do as he was told, so he put his receiver back on the hook, and tiptoed out of the house again to where he had left his bicycle propped against the iron railings.

When he got back to the stocks the dead man was lying in the same position. There was no sign that anyone had been there since the Constable left, and after looking over the ground for a bit with the aid of his torch, in the hope of discovering some clue, or footprint, the Constable leaned his back against the tree, and tried, while waiting for the Inspector to arrive, to puzzle out the problem for himself.

It was not very long before he heard the sound of a car in the distance, and in a few minutes it drew up beside the green, and Inspector Jerrold hopped out nimbly, and turned to give a hand to a stout man in whom the Constable recognised Dr Hawke, the Police-Surgeon.

‘Well,’ said the Inspector briskly. ‘Where is this body, Dickenson? Oh! – ah!’ He stepped up to the bench, and ran his torch over the still figure there. ‘H’m! Not much for you here, Doctor, from the looks of it. Turn those headlights this way, Hill. That’s better. Like this when you found him, was he?’

‘No, sir, not properly. He was sitting up – well, when I say sitting, he was kind of slouching forward, if you know what I mean. I thought he was asleep. Him being in evening-dress, and his feet in the stocks like that, I never thought but what he’s had a glass too many – so I went up to him and put my hand on his shoulder to give him a bit of a shake and wake him up. Twice I shook him, and then it struck me there was something queer about him, and I felt the palm of my hand kind of wet and sticky, and I switched my torch on him – and then of course I saw he was dead. Me shaking him like that made him fall sideways, like you see.’

The Inspector nodded, his eyes on the Doctor, who was kneeling behind the body. ‘Sergeant Hamlyn says you identified him. Who is he? Don’t seem to know his face.’

‘Well, I daresay you might not, sir. It’s Mr Vereker, of Riverside Cottage.’

‘Oh!’ said the Inspector with a little sniff. ‘One of those week-end people. Anything out of the way, Doctor?’

‘I shall have to do a PM, of course,’ grumbled the Doctor, getting up rather ponderously from his knees. ‘But it looks quite a straight case. Knife wound a little below the left shoulder-blade. Death probably occurred instantaneously.’

The Inspector watched him at work on the body for a moment or two, and presently asked: ‘Formed any opinion of the time it was done, sir?’

‘Say two to four hours,’ replied the Doctor, and straightened his back. ‘That’s all for the present, thanks.’

The Inspector turned to Constable Dickenson. ‘Know how the body was sitting when you found it?’

‘Yes, sir.’

‘All right. Put it back as near as you can. Ready with that flashlight, Thompson?’

Constable Dickenson did not care much for the task allotted him, but he went up at once to the body and raised it to the original position, and carefully laid one arm across the stiffening legs. The Inspector watched him in silence and, when he stepped back at last, made a sign to the photographer.

By the time the photographer had finished his work the police ambulance had arrived, and a light was turned on in one of the windows of an adjacent cottage. The Inspector cast a shrewd glance up at the window and said curtly: ‘Right. You can take him out now. Careful how you touch that bar! We may get a fingerprint.’

The bar of the stocks was raised, the body lifted out and carried to the ambulance, just as the lighted window was thrown up and a tousled head poked out. A ghoulishly expectant voice called out: ‘What’s the matter? Has there been an accident? Anybody hurt?’

‘Just a bit of an accident, Mrs Duke,’ replied Constable Dickenson. ‘Nothing for you to worry about.’

The head was withdrawn, but the voice could be heard adjuring one Horace to get up quick, because the police were outside with an ambulance and all.

‘What I know of this village, we’ll have a whole pack of busybodies here inside of ten minutes,’ said the Inspector, with a grim little smile. ‘All right, you men: mortuary. Now then, Dickenson, let’s hear what you can tell us. When did you discover the body?’

‘By my reckoning, sir, it would be about ten minutes to two. It was just on two when I rung up the Station, me having been out on patrol.’

‘You didn’t see anyone here? No car? Didn’t hear anything?’

‘No, sir. Nothing.’

‘Was the man – what’s his name – Vereker, staying at Riverside Cottage?’

‘Not to my knowledge he wasn’t, sir, but then he didn’t, not during the week as a general rule. It being Saturday, I figured it out he must have been on his way down to the Cottage. Mrs Beaton would know whether he was there. She’d have had her orders to go in and make things ready for him.’

‘Does she live out?’

‘Yes, sir. Pennyfarthing Row, a couple of minutes from the cottage. She keeps the place clean, and gets in milk and eggs and such, when he’s coming down. He often gets down late on Saturdays, so she was telling me. I have known him to bring his valet down to do for him, but just as often he comes alone.’ He paused, and corrected himself. ‘When I say alone, I mean he often don’t bring a servant with him.’

‘What do you mean?’ inquired the Doctor.

‘Well, sir, he sometimes bring friends down with him.’ He gave a little cough. ‘Most often females, so I’ve heard.’

‘Wife? Sister?’ interrupted the Inspector.

‘Oh no, sir! Nothing like that,’ replied the Constable, rather shocked.

‘Oh, that kind of female!’ said the Inspector. ‘We’d better go round first thing in the morning to Riverside Cottage, and see if there’s anything to be got there. There’s nothing here. Ground’s too dry for footprints. We’ll get along, Doctor, if you’re ready. You’ll hand in your report tomorrow, Dickenson, see? You can go off to bed now.’ He moved away towards the car with the Doctor. Constable Dickenson heard him say in his dry way: ‘Looks to me like a case for the Yard. London man. Nothing to do with us. Nice easy case too – if they can lay their hands on the woman.’

‘Quite,’ agreed the Doctor, smothering a yawn. ‘If he had a woman with him.’

Two

Inspector Jerrold made a very early call on the Chief Constable next morning, and found him eating his breakfast. He apologised for disturbing him, but the Colonel merely waved him to a chair, and said: ‘Not at all. What’s your trouble? Anything serious?’

‘Pretty serious, sir. Man found stabbed to death at Ashleigh Green at 1:50 this morning.’

‘Good God! You don’t say so! Who is it?’

‘Gentleman of the name of Arnold Vereker, sir, of Riverside Cottage.’

‘God bless my soul!’ ejaculated the Colonel, putting down his coffee-cup. ‘Who did it? Any idea?’

‘No, sir, none. No clues at all so far. The body was found by Constable Dickenson – in the stocks.’

‘In the what?’

‘Does sound odd, doesn’t it, sir? But that’s how it was.’

‘Do you mean he was put in the stocks and then stabbed, or what?’

‘It’s hard to say, sir. Not much bleeding, you see: nothing on the ground. Might have been stabbed first, though why anyone should take the trouble to put the body in the stocks I can’t make out. He was in evening-dress, no hat or overcoat, and the only thing we’ve got so far that looks like helping us at all is his hands, which were dirty. Smear of motor-oil on one, inference being he’d had to change a tyre, or do some repair on a car. But his car’s not there, and not at the garage either. Of course, he may have walked into the village from Riverside Cottage – it’s under a mile away – but it seems a funny thing to do at that hour of night. The Doctor doesn’t put the hour of the murder earlier than twelve o’clock, or thereabouts. No, it looks like he was motoring down with someone or other for the week-end. What I thought, sir, was that I should go off to Riverside Cottage first thing after seeing you to find out if he was staying there, or expected down last night. Seems to have been a gentleman with irregular sort of habits.’

‘Yes, I believe so,’ said the Colonel. ‘Didn’t know him myself, but one hears things. A city man – mining interests, so I was informed. I don’t fancy it’s much of a case for us, Inspector. What do you feel about it?’

‘Well, sir, pretty much what you do. Of course, we don’t know that it wasn’t a local affair, but on the face of it, it doesn’t look like it. I’ve got a man out at Ashleigh Green making inquiries, but I don’t expect to get much. You know what it is out in the country, sir. Folks go to bed early, and if there wasn’t any noise made, barring the car – assuming there was a car – no one would be likely to wake up – or take any notice if they were awake. The Doctor’s of the opinion death must have been pretty well instantaneous. There’s no sign of any struggle. Dickenson tells me this Mr Vereker was in the habit of bringing friends down from Town over the week-end. What we want is his car. That might tell us something. How I look at it, sir, is we’ll have to get on to the Yard for information, whatever happens.’

‘Quite right. Not our case at all. Still, you should certainly go to this cottage you speak of and see what you can pick up. Does he keep any servants there?’

‘No, sir. There’s a woman by the name of Beaton who keeps the place tidy, by what I understand, but she lives out. I’ll see her of course, but I don’t expect to find anyone at the Cottage. ’Tisn’t likely. But I might get a line on it.’

The Inspector was wrong. Half an hour later, when he and Constable Dickenson got out of the police car at Riverside Cottage, there were unmistakable signs that the cottage was occupied.

It was a small house of stuccoed brick and jade-green shutters, standing in wooded grounds that ran down to the river. The position was what house-agents would describe as picturesque and secluded, no other house being visible in summer from any of its windows.

As the car drew up a dog started barking inside the house, and the Constable said at once: ‘That’s funny. Mr Vereker never had a dog down here to my knowledge.’

The Inspector set his finger on the electric bell, remarking as he did so: ‘Might be the charwoman’s. Who looks after the garden, and the electric light plant?’

‘Young Beaton, sir. He comes in a couple of days a week. But he wouldn’t bring his dog with him, not into the house. There’s someone here all right. I can hear him moving about.’

The Inspector pressed the bell again, and was about to press it a third time when the door was opened to them by a girl with a head of burnished-copper curls, and very large and brilliant dark eyes. She was wearing a man’s dressing-gown of expensive-looking brocade, which was several sizes too large for her, and was chiefly occupied in keeping back a powerful bull-terrier who did not seem to view the visitors with much favour.

‘Shut up, you fool!’ commanded the girl. ‘Heel! – What on earth do you want?’ This last remark was addressed in a tone of considerable surprise to the Inspector.

‘Inspector Jerrold, miss, from Hanborough,’ said the Inspector, introducing himself. ‘If convenient, I should like to have a word with you.’

She looked at him frowningly. ‘I don’t know what you want to have a word with me about, but you can come in if you like. Get back, Bill!’

The two men followed her into a square hall, decorated in a modernist style, with curtains and a carpet of cubist design, a number of tubular steel chairs, and a squat table of limed oak. The girl saw Constable Dickenson blink at it and said with a flickering smile: ‘You needn’t think I did it.’ The Constable looked at her rather quickly, involuntarily startled. ‘You’d better come into the kitchen. I haven’t finished breakfast. The scenery’s better too.’ She strolled ahead of them through a door at the end of the hall into a pleasant kitchen with a tiled floor, a homely-looking dresser, and a breakfast of eggs and coffee and toast spread at one end of the large table. An electric cooker stood at one end of the room, and a small electric brazier had been attached by a long flex to the light fixture, and was switched on for the purpose of drying a linen skirt which was hung over a chair-back in front of it. The Inspector, pausing on the threshold, cast a swift, trained glance round the room. His gaze rested for a moment on the damp skirt, and travelled to the girl. She walked round the table, picking up a slice of half-eaten toast and butter from her plate in a casual way as she passed, and pulled a chair forward. ‘Sit down, won’t you? I warn you, I shan’t make any statement till I’ve seen my solicitor.’ She looked up as she spoke, and raised her brows. ‘Joke,’ she explained.

The Inspector smiled politely. ‘Yes, miss, naturally. Might I ask if you are staying here?’

‘God, no!’

The Inspector glanced at the brocade dressing-gown, and looked inquiring.

‘Quite right, I spent the night here,’ said the girl coolly. ‘Anything else you’d like to know?’

‘Did you come down with Mr Vereker, miss?’

‘No, I didn’t. I haven’t seen Mr Vereker.’

‘Indeed, miss? Was he not expecting you?’

A rather hard glint crept into the girl’s fine eyes. ‘Well, everything was very nicely prepared, but I don’t fancy it was on my account. But what the hell it has to do with –’ She broke off, and laughed suddenly. ‘Oh, I see! Sorry to disappoint you, but I’m not a burglar – though I did get in through a window. The dressing-gown is merely borrowed till my skirt’s dry.’

The Inspector directed his gaze towards the skirt. ‘I quite understand, miss. Must have been a bad stain, if I may say so.’

‘Blood,’ said the girl between sips of coffee.

Constable Dickenson gave a slight gasp.

‘Blood?’ said the Inspector evenly.

The girl set down her cup, and met his look with a belligerent gleam in her eyes. ‘Just what do you want with me?’ she demanded.

‘I’d like to know how you came to get blood on your skirt, miss,’ said the Inspector.

‘Yes? Well, I should like to know what right you have to ask me that – or anything else for that matter. Get on with it! What is it you’re after?’

The Inspector drew out his notebook. ‘There’s no need to take offence, miss. We’ve had a little upset in these parts last night, and I have to find out one or two details. May I have your name and address, please?’

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1