Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    God's Battalions: The Case for the Crusades
    God's Battalions: The Case for the Crusades
    God's Battalions: The Case for the Crusades
    Audiobook8 hours

    God's Battalions: The Case for the Crusades

    Written by Rodney Stark

    Narrated by David Drummond

    4/5

    ()

    Switch to ebook

    About this audiobook

    In God's Battalions, award-winning author Rodney Stark takes on the long-held view that the Crusades were the first round of European colonialism, conducted for land, loot, and converts by barbarian Christians who victimized the cultivated Muslims. To the contrary, Stark argues that the Crusades were the first military response to unwarranted Muslim terrorist aggression.

    Stark reviews the history of the seven major Crusades from 1095 to 1291, demonstrating that the Crusades were precipitated by Islamic provocations, centuries of bloody attempts to colonize the West, and sudden attacks on Christian pilgrims and holy places. Although the Crusades were initiated by a plea from the pope, Stark argues that this had nothing to do with any elaborate design of the Christian world to convert all Muslims to Christianity by force of arms. Given current tensions in the Middle East and terrorist attacks around the world, Stark's views are a thought-provoking contribution to our understanding and are sure to spark debate.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherTantor Media, Inc
    Release dateDec 21, 2009
    ISBN9781400184705
    Author

    Rodney Stark

    Rodney Stark is the Distinguished Professor of the Social Sciences at Baylor University. His thirty books on the history and sociology of religion include The Rise of Christianity, Cities of God, For the Glory of God, Discovering God, and The Victory of Reason: How Christianity Led to Freedom, Capitalism, and Western Success. Stark received his Ph.D. from the University of California, Berkeley.

    More audiobooks from Rodney Stark

    Related to God's Battalions

    Related audiobooks

    History For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      The Crusade Against The Odds

      Oct 26, 2023

      The Crusade Against The Odds
      7 min read

    • Article

      The Children’s Crusade

      Dec 29, 2020

      The Children’s Crusade
      4 min read

    • Article

      The First Crusade Had Been Defeated?

      Apr 22, 2021

      Professor of Global History at Oxford University, Director of the Centre for Byzantine Research and Senior Research Fellow at Worcester College. Author of The First Crusade: The Call From The East, and The Silk Roads: A New History Of The World Who w

      5 min read

    • Article

      Wrath And Aftermath

      Aug 6, 2019

      By Elisabeth Gallas; translated from the German by Alex Skinner. New York University Press, 2019. $35. Reviewed by K. M. Kostyal Europe lay in ruins and 6 million Jews had been murdered when, in late winter 1946, the American military designated an o

      8 min read

    • Article

      The Scourge Of Civilisations

      Mar 14, 2024

      The Scourge Of Civilisations
      3 min read

    • Article

      Revealed: The Ancient Propaganda War That Led To The Triumph Of Christianity

      Apr 16, 2021

      New historical research is shedding fresh light on the birth of Christianity as a major religion. Although Christianity had existed since the mid-first century AD, it didn’t become the Roman empire’s main religion until more than 250 years later. Now

      5 min read

    • Article

      Reconquista What’s In A Name?

      Apr 15, 2021

      The Emirate of Granada’s surrender in 1492 marked the formal end of Muslim rule on the Iberian Peninsula. Soon after, the conquerors began forced conversions of Muslims, culminating in the expulsion of all Muslims and Jews from Spain. The Christian v

      3 min read

    • Article

      Where Was The Holy Land?

      Jul 14, 2021

      Where Was The Holy Land?
      6 min read

    • Article

      A Clash Of Civilisations?

      May 14, 2020

      A Clash Of Civilisations?
      7 min read

    • Article

      The Great Unravelling

      Dec 28, 2022

      The Great Unravelling
      3 min read

    • Article

      Letters

      May 12, 2022

      I feel that the article concerning Napoleon (April) was unfair to its subject. While his later career frequently saw his original ideals undermined by the reality of power, he was from the first a believer in the revolution, as his letters and genera

      3 min read

    • Article

      Rise Of The Knights Templar

      Nov 4, 2021

      Rise Of The Knights Templar
      12 min read

    • Article

      Ancient World

      Dec 21, 2023

      Ancient World
      7 min read

    • Article

      A King Of Fire And Light

      Dec 28, 2021

      A King Of Fire And Light
      10 min read

    • Article

      Dan Jones Plunges Into The Clash Of Religions In ‘Crusaders’

      Mar 24, 2020

      The popular historian examines the violence and fanaticism, as well as the devotion and conviction, at the heart of the holy wars.

      3 min read

    • Article

      Seeing Blue And Green

      Sep 8, 2023

      The teams were distinguished by colours: blue, green, red, and white. The supporters of the teams were found in every section of society, sometimes even including the emperor. The renowned ancient author Pliny the Younger’s statement on team supporte

      8 min read

    • Article

      Tudor Rebellion

      Nov 24, 2022

      On Whit Monday 1549, William Underhill and William Seagar two respectable inhabitants of the little Devon village of Sampford Courtenay - got into an argument with their vicar at the parish church. They told him that they disliked the new Book of Com

      8 min read

    • Article

      Ten Ways to Save the World

      Oct 16, 2020

      If imagining yourself as the messiah could get you decapitated by the 10th century Abbasids, then in 20th-century Michigan it only got you institutionalized. The post Ten Ways to Save the World appeared first on The Millions.

      30 min read

    • Article

      A Hollow Victory?

      Oct 26, 2023

      A Hollow Victory?
      1 min read

    • Article

      The World Of Louis Ix

      May 5, 2023

      Louis IX, who came to the throne twelve years later, was heir to these developments, and he reigned for the better part of half a century, during the most vibrant decades of the thirteenth century. His reign, initially aided by the regency of his for

      11 min read

    • Article

      Reviews

      May 31, 2022

      Reviews
      3 min read

    • Article

      The Past

      Apr 22, 2021

      The Byzantine Emperor Alexios was losing territory fast and was desperate to find some way of stopping the rot. Heavily fortified cities, that had once been his, were now being used against him by the Turks in order to bolster their advances and thei

      1 min read

    • Article

      Punishment From On High

      Jan 19, 2023

      Punishment From On High
      3 min read

    • Article

      A Nation’s Alibi

      Feb 25, 2020

      A Nation’s Alibi
      8 min read

    • Article

      Q&A YOU ASK, WE ANSWER

      Oct 29, 2020

      Q&A YOU ASK, WE ANSWER
      8 min read

    • Article

      Inquistion In The New World

      Aug 10, 2023

      Inquistion In The New World
      7 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for God's Battalions

    4/5

    86 ratings11 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 5/5
      Muslims have sex with kids and practice this daily. We need another crusade
    • 5/5
      Convincing portrayal of the crusades, debunking the prevailing sentiments about them.

      1 person found this helpful

    • 5/5
      As pretty much all of Rodney Stark’s work, I found it thought provoking and a nice read. He is a fantastic author and a historian who offers a unique perspective with a “tells it like it is” sort of attitude. This book was very informative and I would recommend it to anyone interested in the subject.

      1 person found this helpful

    • 3/5
      God’s Battalions may one of those titles which is likely to create controversy, but controversy that may be necessary. Why? Perhaps because it is high time that the politically correct version of the ‘history’ of the crusades presented so often in the media was challenged. All too often it seems, the crusades are presented as an unprovoked attack by bigoted Western religious fanatics against a peaceful civilisation and its ‘enlightened’ populace.

      Stark reveals that the reality was not so simple. I for one have heard or read before of Islamic aggression against Europe before the Crusades, and the conquest of much formerly Christian territory in North Africa and the Middle East, so this was nothing new to me, but it is useful in refuting the notion idea of the ‘unprovoked’ crusades. The author however, goes further to challenge the notion that the Islamic culture was technologically and intellectually superior to that of Europe, demonstrating that many of the intellectual advances in fact seem to have been made largely by Jews, Christians other minority groups, or pre-Islamic cultures.

      He also rejects the notion of the ‘dark ages’, a term which is no longer favoured by historians, and argues that Western technology was actually superior to that of the East, which only triumphed in terms of ‘book learning’. Again, some of the above may be familiar territory considering my training in medieval history, though this first part of the book was altogether the more interesting.

      As a historian the author’s occasional criticism or apparent distrust of the writings of those of this profession isn't something I would perhaps be entirely comfortable with.
      I don't think they are all wrong and that he 'knows better' all the time, That said his his assertion about the lack of attention given to some events (like the massacre at Antioch) by some historians may be valid, and does not seem a good thing.
      My only other concern was one claim made by the author which I know to have been historically incorrect – that knights who wore plate armour ‘had to be lifted onto their horses with looms’. This was never the case in battle, only with the more elaborate suits of armour worn at jousts, and its inclusion may cause some questions over the historical validity of some details and claims. For the most part however, I think the work is generally reliable.

      The second half did not seem nearly as interesting and engaging, and seems to get caught up in what were essentially just brief accounts of the major events and persons of the crusading period.
      There didn’t seem to be any real analysis, at least not in depth as one might expect from a more specialised history book, though this is not one of those. Rather it is an examination of the time period, and the major themes, trends and views thereof.
      By arguing that there was indeed something in the stories of attacks on pilgrims, persecution of Christians and highlighting some of the massacres perpetrated by Islamic armies this work may do something to redress the imbalance of popular opinion against the crusades, and the ‘clashing civilisations’ which took part in them.
      Also interesting was the mention of how some clergymen attempted to protect Jewish communities in the cities which crusaders targeted, demonstrating perhaps that anti-Semitic sentiments were not universally shared in the West.

      Some have spoken of the author’s belief that the Crusades were a good thing, and whilst this work may indeed be somewhat polemical in its intention and the authors thinks regards the crusades as ‘Christendom fighting back’, I’m not sure if the author expressly praises them as something positive.
      Maybe I just failed to notice such a sentiment which may have been present, but I personally get the impression that this book was more apologetic then designed to promote the ideals and actions of the crusaders, or apply them to modern American foreign policy.

      Altogether God’s Battalions is a worthwhile work, though perhaps it would have been better as a more dedicated study of misconceptions about the crusades.
      I understand that the author needed to give some overview of the main facts, but the way these took up much of the second half of the book, making it appear rather dull or dry, and seeming lack of analysis meant that I did not enjoy this as much as I could have. Also, whilst there are many good and worthwhile sources, I wouldn’t take everything the author says as ‘gospel’.
    • 4/5
      I did like Stark's willingness to probe a bit further into history and explain the Crusades and events leading to them, than to accept what is, in some quarters, a tendency to just pass off the Crusades as another Christian murder spree. He cites different bodies of work, (and some are dated, but which historical writer does not cite some dated material - duh - writing history sometimes does involve old materials?!). He exposes some of the biases or unwillingness of other authors to look at the contextual and cultural factors of the Crusades on both sides. I certainly was not aware of how many Crusades there were, how they were financed, how their mission was portrayed to their participants, and who fought in them. That being said, I felt there was some choppiness in the book. I also wish that there would have been some more maps, or maybe some better ones, included by the author so the reader could get a better perspective on the participant movements and locations of some of the cities/territories mentioned.
    • 4/5
      I really liked this is part because it reminded me of other books and people from this time in history I've read about in the past. So many interesting people so largely forgotten.

      A brief history of the crusades. The book appears to be very well cited and even if you disagree with the author's conclusions you have to admit his did his research.

      One of the main points of the book is not that the crusades were wonderful but that they are unfairly understood in a modern context as a great evil mentioned in the same breath as the holocaust or the Spanish inquisition. Mr. Stark makes a very strong case that this demonstrates a misunderstanding for the motivations behind the crusades, the surrounding morals and rules of warfare in that time, competing atrocities on both sides, and how brief the negative view of the crusades has been. He makes a strong case that there is no tradition of hate in the middle east based on the depredations of crusaders.

      Interesting book.

      So many opportunities for great movies with the great characters in History. People like Richard the Lionheart and Iron Arm the conqueror of Italy are two that appear briefly here.
    • 2/5
      Stark is right in saying that the crusades were not unprovoked. This, however, seems to be the most salient point he makes. On the whole, this work is quite tendentious. Stark relies too heavily on secondary sources. Furthermore, he uses his (limited) primary sources inconsistently and irresponsibly. This is a decidedly polemical pseudo-history that pushes well beyond what the evidence allows. With this attempt to offer a corrective reading of the crusades, Stark falls well short of his goal and probably does more harm than good.
    • 4/5
      If you're looking for some good history on the crusades, without all the hate towards Europe, the West, or Christianity, this is a great place to start. Stark lays out the case that the crusades were in many ways a war not unlike so many others, but with a different motivation than many. He argues that Europe was responding to invasion by the Turks & Muslims; that the battle conduct of the crusaders was similar to the norm for the era (not unusually brutal); the Muslims were not somehow more enlightened or civilized than the Europeans (& thus deserving of our sympathy); and that those who went on the crusades did so at great personal or familial cost, not out of some desire for plunder. While he does this, he does not degrade the Muslims nor place the crusaders on a pedestal. He is fair, but realistic about both sides strengths and weaknesses. The result is a much more favorable treatment of the crusaders than many may be used to, but he is, in a sense, merely righting the balance. Eleven pages of bibliography allow you to follow-up on and check Stark's claims and while the book is written at a level that reads very easily, his conclusions are documented and he kindly includes end-notes.
    • 5/5
      I thought that the book was well done for what it was. This never was to be an extremely indepth historical text but rather a "case for the crusades". Over the years I have heard many who claim (in conversation) that we are to blame for the muslims hating us because of the crusades but I have always considered them off base. The muslims had been expanding and taking over christian lands for centuries and it was this aggression which finally created the need to strike back. This is what Mr. Stark shows well enough in his book and I applaud his stance. I am also happy to see him reiterate the need to view the extreme violence and massacres of the time not through the lenses of today's opinions but in their historical views of their own time. I find that I, in conversations, have to repeatedly remind people who criticize past events that they have to do this exact thing. Overall I would say its a good quick read and worthwhile to get a common sense view on the events.
    • 4/5
      I'm not sure he made a case for the crusades, but I'm also not familiar with the argument he's trying to counteract. In the introduction he claims that it has become commonplace for Western historians to be critical of the Crusades as an unprovoked, military action against a peaceful and more cultured people. I believe this is the claim he is arguing against, I believe he does a fine job. There are numerous citations to previous research to aid his argument. In fact, he claims early on that he did little direct research in this area, but instead relied on previous historians.
    • 1/5
      Stark argues that the crusades were not unprovoked, and were not a colonial episode. I found hisarguments in support of these claims. He asserts that the cultural level of the crusaderswas on a par with that of the muslims, but here his argument is weak - he claims thatarab culture was really the culture of its subject peoples, but many of these were muslim.He also tries to justify the sack of Constantinople, on the grounds that this sort of eventwas not unknown at the time.