Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Here on Earth
Here on Earth
Here on Earth
Audiobook8 hours

Here on Earth

Written by Alice Hoffman

Narrated by Susan Ericksen

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

About this audiobook

A seductive and mesmerizing story of obsessive love from the New York Times bestselling author of The Rules of Magic.

After nineteen years in California, March Murray returns to the small Massachusetts town where she grew up. For all this time, March has been avoiding her own troubled history, but when she encounters Hollis—the boy she loved so desperately, the man who has never forgotten her—the past collides with the present as their reckless love is reignited. This dark romantic tale asks whether it is possible to survive a love that consumes you completely. The answers March Murray discovers are both heartbreaking and wise, as complex as they are devastating—for in heaven and in our dreams, love is simple and glorious. But it is something altogether different here on earth...

LanguageEnglish
Release dateMay 29, 2009
ISBN9781441807380
Here on Earth
Author

Alice Hoffman

Alice Hoffman is the author of more than thirty works of fiction, including The Book of Magic, Magic Lessons, The World That We Knew, Practical Magic, The Rules of Magic (a Reese Witherspoon Book Club Pick), the Oprah’s Book Club Selection Here on Earth, The Red Garden, The Dovekeepers, The Museum of Extraordinary Things, The Marriage of Opposites, and Faithful. She lives near Boston.

More audiobooks from Alice Hoffman

Related to Here on Earth

Related audiobooks

General Fiction For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Here on Earth

Rating: 3.5218477478152312 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

801 ratings34 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The book reminded me of Wuthering Heights. The story was ok.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A modern day retelling of Wuthering heights with similar accounts of incest, betrayal, infidelity and death. It's an okay read although I don't think anyone could ever replicate the insanity of the character that was Mr Heathcliff. And unlike the 1800s, incest is generally more frowned upon.
    3 star read.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A deeply-layered story about the fragility of family love, the choices we make, and those made for us.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Took a long time to get started but did pick up in the end
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    From "deep in the heart" of Georgia N.


    Like all of Hoffman's other books, the end leaves me wanting Hoffman to have written one more chapter, tying up all the loose ends in the other central characters' lives. The story isn't finished. In this book, I want to see Gwen and March return to Richard in California, returning to their old lives, but changed forever. I want Richard to finally get the whole of March's love, no longer entangled with her childhood love, free to be open, free to return to her art. I want Gwen to imagine a life for herself where love for a man takes second place to her own ambitions she didn't know she had before. Perhaps to study the phenomena of battered women's lives, and what it takes to move on.

    I want March to begin to love herself. The ending hints that she will eventually, but I want to see it happen. I want her to understand what pulled her toward danger, and recognize it as a false narrative too many women (including my own younger self) get wrapped up in. The fairy tales of Bluebeard and other fantastical beings representing the metanarrative, the spaces in which these characters have lived way too long, enraptured with the stories that lead them toward self-destruction. And what it takes to build and engage in different endings than what those fairy tales would bind them toward.

    The ending here only lightly hints at something different than the narrative the characters seem to be bound up in, to be heading toward. And only from the eyes of a single character, Hank, whose point of view at the end is only suggested here and there prior to the ending. Why end with a POV that is not even one of the main characters's? (Tho difficult to untangle from the others, I would say that the primary women: March, Gwen, Susan…and, oh damn…there’s at least one more that I recall as crucial, but I can’t remember the name. See what I mean?

    While others may be fine with the other characters’ primary narrative POV only barely hinted at in the end, I myself I want just a bit more, so that, after what appears to be heading toward a severely tragic end throughout the book, it takes a more positive turn, but is barely hinted at, is more strongly evident. I want to know what the primary characters have learned about themselves, about others, about the broader narrative of the human condition as well as that limited to themselves. Not in any sort of didactic way, just having what the story is leaning toward be more strongly developed.

    Perhaps that’s just me, and my own personal narrative trying to turn away from the tragic plot lines it’s been heading, turning toward a more positive understanding—what I sought or hoped to learn, even if only vaguely. Well, actually, to take what I’ve learned myself from what would have otherwise ended in tragedy had I not encountered experiences and people who made a difference, and get it more solidly laid down—instead of returning to the same narrative over and over again, slightly altered by age and historical circumstances. A plot more deeply rooted in a deeper understanding not only of my own life and the characters I’ve encountered, but also with generous hints at the more universal themes of renewal.

    I don’t know. Perhaps I ask took much of other authors. Perhaps, being younger than I, they haven’t yet quite reached the perspective of a woman knowing her death is likely only a few years away, and wanting to share what she’s learned…but not in any didactic way; rather, drawn out of narratives instead of being encased in more abstract ideas.

    Rather than telling people how to do it, I want to SHOW how one person may (note the “may”) have done it, as that is so much more solidly concrete and thus more believable as a realistic possibility among us flesh and blood creatures. And I can more solidly ground the learning, and because of that solidity, make it less likely to slip away as new, and perhaps larger, obstacles block my way, causing me to slip and perhaps even fall…just not all the way down from the height I have achieved at that point.

    Of course, yes I know, bottom line it’s about me finding my way and not losing the treasures I have gained during the journey.

    At 73, I really need to get that story written down—or rather, made more concrete, artistically shaped, and more readable than my journals and long emails (or other internet options) directed mostly at friends, or people who would be my friends if I were to meet them. Meetings not likely to happen in “real life,” but instead in bytes scattered across many locations. Too much, too difficult, too overly burdensome for anyone other than myself to put into a coherent shape.

    Well, perhaps that is “too self-centered” a way to read stories, whether creatively built and told as fiction, or as life stories, which are also creatively built, just in a different way, with different narrative rules. Many people who’ve been in my life, ultimately in a negative way, have said my stories are written just to “glorify” myself—tho considering how many mistakes are covered, I can’t much see the glory. They would remark on all the “I’s” I’ve used here, whether talking about Hoffman’s work or my own.

    I once (there’s that “ugly ‘I’ again) asked them “How do you say “I love you” without using the word “I”? If I have a fictional character say the same thing to another fictional character, it is inevitably far removed from the reader’s or the listener’s own life, no matter what technique is used to pull readers in more closely.

    Ok, enough about me. Truly. But understand this: when I use the word “I”—whether in fiction or in creative non-fiction, I mean it to touch, or dearly WANT it to touch, the “I” of the reader/listener, and not merely myself.

    Despite my criticism of this book regarding wanting more than is provided, I still give it 5 stars. It succeeds in what it sets out to do. I'm just wanting the author to set out to do more. But such stories are mine to write, and I must get on with it.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The Hollis trope just goes on too long...he remains such a jerk-hole that it becomespredictable and boring...though readers may be impressed that NOTHING gets past him.With March overcoming her descent into oblivious and blinding,obsession, the plot should have been so much better!Ending was goofy.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Here on Earth is a modern retelling of Wuthering Heights. It is set in a small town in Massachusetts called Jenkintown that is brought to life with all the magical description Alice Hoffman is known for. I admit I was a little dubious. I love the Bronte's books, and so often retellings can go very wrong. Here on Earth is not a direct retelling; certainly, Heathcliff or Hollis is not quite the tragic and heroic figure of the original. Each character is drawn to be true to a modern setting, and that is all right. Indeed, it makes for a compelling story in its own right, even for readers not familiar with the original. I really loved this book. I'm a fan of Alice Hoffman regardless, but this is one of her better efforts in my opinion.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This book suckered me a little, but I respect it for doing so. Most times when someone reconnects with their first love in a book, you can't help rooting for that love to triumph. Here, that's exactly what happened-- March and Hollis were young and devoted to each other, but he left town to make his fortune and she eventually gave up waiting on him. Fast-forward a couple of decades, and when March comes back to town for a funeral, she and Hollis reconnect. At first it's very much the lovey-dovey kind of thing I expected from a story about a reunion of first loves, but then Alice Hoffman does what she does best: she uses heartbreakingly beautiful descriptors to paint a world that's dark and even a little grim, but one from which you can't tear your eyes away.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    OBC, very dark love story. Woman comes back to boy she knew, but he's become abusive and possessive. Will she finally see the relationship for what it is, not what it was?
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I have heard a lot of good things about Alice Hoffman so I picked this book up at a book sale. I was very disappointed. This might be the lowest I have ever rated a book. I thought I had an obligation to advise people to stay away from this book. Of course I really doubt I would ever pick up an Alice Hoffman book again. Her characters make no sense and are not at all believable. The portrayal of a small town in New England where everybody knows everyone else is a cliche. The only reason I gave it 2 stars was because it held my interest and I was hoping that the ending would be somewhat creative but it wasn't. Obviously those that gave it 5 stars must have a whole different taste in book genres than I do.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    When I found out that Here on Earth was inspired by Wuthering Heights, I knew I had to read it. Most of the novels I've read by Hoffman have been really enjoyable, and Here on Earth didn't disappoint. Often, retellings are just modern versions of the same exact story that follows the same plot. What this story does, while retaining many similarities to Wuthering Heights, is maintain originality. The plot doesn't run parallel with the classic, which I really appreciated. I enjoyed the characters, even though I wanted to smack a few of them. I found Hollis, the Heathcliff-inspired character, to be even more of a villain, yet March was definitely more subdued than Cathy. At first, I wondered if the passion would be subdued as well, but found it to be dark and destructively passionate as its muse.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A well-written story about love and obsession. March Murray returns for the funeral of the woman who raised her, and finds again the love of her youth. Hollis, who was raised in March's home, has been waiting for her return, for the one thing he never found. The story of Hollis and March, and of March's daughter Gwen, the story of how love in a small town changes them irrevocably, is excellent reading.Hoffman's characterizations are believable, but a large part of what I enjoyed about the story was the descriptions of the Massachusetts town and countryside as the seasons progressed. Hoffman can really make a picture come to life with her words.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Deeply horrible, with unrealistic, unlikeable characters. Wuthering Heights has never been my favorite Brontë novel, but seeing how badly this knock-off failed has filled me with new appreciation for the original.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I read this book years ago and it has stayed with me. It is a modern Wuthering Heights story. I love all of Alice Hoffman's books, but this one has stayed with me the most. She captures the dark intensity of emotions that so many people are afraid to acknowledge and explore. I'd love to do an adult book discussion some day comparing and contrasting this book and Bronte's Wuthering Heights.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I agree with some of the earlier reviewers---March seemed so overwhelmed with a man she really did not know at all, based on her memories of her much younger self, and yet he was not at all the same and she simply could not see it. The ending seemed as though the man in the picture was finally overwhelmed with himself and yet I found myself wanting to know what happened to all of them in the next few years. I listened to the audio version and it was absorbing but I wanted more at the end---too many question marks.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    My first Alice Hoffman and will wait to get thru some other authors and books before I pick up some of her others. I didn't dislike it, but maybe it was a bit darker than I like.
    I'm a pansy for any author who can get published and have a lot of people like their books.
    I'll read them and always find some good things to absorb.
    Read in 2004
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Beautifully written, this novel is about a collision of past and present, with the one woman in the center of the novel having been stuck between them for some twenty years, not moving in either direction...until now. Her drama encompasses that of the lives of her daughter and others, and Hoffman paints full portraits of the unique individuals at the center of the novel, bringing a unique flavor to what might otherwise be a more straightforwrad drama. Her incorporations of animals and of landscape are also flawless, making a small town come to more realistic breath than in many other works that specialize more in the small town's charicature.Simply, the work is one which makes you forget you're reading a novel--at times, the heartbreak and humor here are far too real, and the characters far too sympathetic. Highly recommended for any readers of drama. While this book doesn't veer into the moments of magical realism that bring together my favorite Hoffman works, this will remain one of my favorites of her work, and is the first 300 page book in agest that I've read in a single day.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    An enjoyable read even tho my opinion about this book kept changing. At first, I noticed the imagery, and enjoyed the way she describes things: "so many orchards circled the village that on some crisp October afternoons the whole world smelled like pie" (p 4), "The sky is so flat and gray Gwen has the urge to put her arms over her head for protection, just in case stones should begin to fall from the clouds." (p40) The focus of the novel shifts a good way in, and I begin to think we're just being given a standard romance plot and I'm disappointed that I won't learn anything from this book. And after a bit the emotional tone changes, becomes more obsessed, and I'm sure I can see where we'll end up, agreeing with another reviewer about being disgusted by the dysfunction. However, one of the characters has more strength than I gave her credit for, and the ending is not what I expected. The book is divided into 3 parts, which somewhat mesh with the shifts I noticed, but not precisely since the story is a smooth progression, so there is a gradual introduction of the shift before the next part. What with the imagery and the ending, I'm happy that I stuck it out. There really are some insights gained by the characters.I was pretty bothered by not being able to figure out for quite a long while the when and where of the setting. There is a mix of time, beginning with March as a mother of a teen and frequently jumping us back to her own teen years. Her description of the village seems so old-fashioned, almost 1930's, which would make "now" 1950's or '60s but her daughter Gwen has such a modern tone of voice. I wonder if that just shows the universality of teen resentment of parents? Her clothes & hairstyle seems too modern but there is no mention of ubiquitous cell phones or computers. I finally decide "now" is 1990's when an adult buys a computer. That would make "then" 1965, however, and I still can't figure out how the village social services are run by "the library board" or how orphaned kids can be taken into a home without a lot of Social Service oversight and inspection. And where? Hoffman doesn't write dialect. Obviously east coast, since there are tidal marshes. Because I get a flash of Beans of Egypt Maine, I guess Maine for the setting, as likely being the most different in village structure and the most "keep your nose out of others' business", but it doesn't seem cold enough. The presence of race horses makes me guess Virginia,perhaps the islands, but midway thru we are told New England.I also had quibbles with some of her statements but wasn't sure my grasp of facts was all that accurate: spring peepers calling in August (p 20), the horses that were "worth more money than her father would ever manage to earn" (p 27). Later we are told how much a horse can be worth, and I see this could have been a true statement for a teen.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Favorite Book!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This dark tale of love is depressing and yet still full of the beautiful, whimsical prose I have come to associate with Alice Hoffman. Not my favorite by her, but enchanting in it's own way.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A friend loaned me this book as I usually love Oprah's Book Club selections, but I was disappointed with this selection Everything seemed too superficial and stereotypical and I wasn't really able to identify with any of the characters. Even the plotting seemed superficial and contrived, and I was actually relieved when I got to the last page and could close the book.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I just wanted to shake some sense into March. Why did she love Hollis? I couldn't wait to be finished with this book so I could quit reading about all these dysfuntional characters.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Here on Earth is one of those books that I enjoyed reading but disliked most of the characters within the story. It is also reminiscent of Bronte's Wuthering Heights. March Murray returns to her hometown in New England with her fifteen year old daughter Gwen. Her childhood housekeeper and nanny Judith, has passed away and March comes back to her hometown for the funeral and to get Judith's affairs in order. March's scientist husband Richard, who is from the same hometown, stays behind in California unable to come on the trip due to his work. When she arrives at her childhood home, old memories resurface and March begins to think about her first love, Hollis. She wonders if she will see him again now that she is back in town. As a child, Hollis was rescued by March's father and brought to live with her family. Hollis was destitute and March's family became his own. However, Hollis was always withdrawn and sullen, only getting along with March and her father and becoming enemies with March's bother, Alan. As time passes, Hollis and March fall in love. Jealously and resentment mostly on Hollis' part, broke the two up when March was just eighteen and Hollis ended up leaving town with no word on his whereabouts. He left March depressed and heartbroken, often staring out her bedroom window in hopes of seeing Hollis return. The two never forgot each other. Three years later, Hollis returns to town a wealthy man, but March has already married Richard and moved to California. Hollis winds up marrying Richard's sister. Does it remind you of Wuthering Heights yet?Now that March is back in town she is desperate to see Hollis. And when she does, old flames reignite and the two are once again inseperable. Like I said I enjoyed reading Here on Earth. It's got an interesting storyline, and Hoffman's writing is lyrical as usual. The sleepy town in New England almost has a haunting air about it, especially when the author describes the woods and the towns history. On the other hand, I couldn't help but be judgemental with the characters choices and thought processes. Hollis, modeled after Heathcliff, was too selfish and sulky for my taste, plus a tad disturbed. He was also very 'full of himself', always expecting March to come looking for him. Another thing is the infidelity within the storyline. The book mostly centers around March's being unfaithful to her husband. I kept wondering if she had completely lost her mind. At one point she even admits that all she cares about is Hollis and nothing else, not even her family. I wonder why Hoffman set out to create these unlikeable main characters? She obviously modeled these people after Catherine and Heathcliff, but when I read Wuthering Heights I didn't dislike them. March and Hollis, on the other hand... I do think this book would make a great book club selection, there's plenty to discuss within the storyline.In the midst of all these screwed up relationships and unlikeable characters, Hoffman's writing had me glued to the page.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Hard to put down - not as good as her more atmospheric novels but still excellent
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Hoffman's story is full of dark surprises. March and Hollis and their obsession with each other took what I expected to be a pleasant tale into a very dark place. I had difficulty placing myself in March's position, as she abandoned her entire family to chase a man who held such little regard for her. March's brother Allen is also a tortured character but had the chance to show some redeeming qualities through his niece, Gwen I was waiting for the happy ending that didn't happen.Hoffman has an interesting writing style and her use of time and place add to the story. This is my second Hoffman book and I am looking forward to reading a few more. Don't read this book if you are looking for a story that has all the loose ends tied up in a nice neat bow. Rather, enjoy this book for an eye-opening look at how easy it is to survive a dysfunctional relationship.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Alice Hoffman is a wonderful story teller, however, I felt this book contained too many references to the town's local lore and felt almost supernatural in a totally realistic story. The beginning was slow going, as was the ending. I felt the ending was short and last minute, like Hoffman was grasping for closure for March and Hollis.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The book is somber and dark. With the exception of Hank, and even he reaches some of my limits, I really don't like the characters. Each character has an element where you may want to have compassion but it is all taken away by the balance of their character.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This book was our book club read. Our group was divided with a few loving it and the rest thinking it was just ok. I was one of the few who loved it. Alice Hoffman's writing draws you in from the very first page. She writes in a way that she can describe a scene without saying the words. It is easy to see why she is one of author, Jodi Picoult's favorite writers. You can truly escape in her stories. Even though this story was depressing, sad, dark, cryptic, and frankly, without much hope for the characters, I still was riveted until the very last page. I could feel myself being drawn into the characters so much that when they were scared, I could feel my own chest tightening. Hoffman describes the feelings of power and control so well, from both perspectives, you can feel yourself right in the situation. I had so many pages and quotes marked from this book, I just want to share a few with you:"Is this how fates are made and futures cast? An idle choice, a windy day, a dog that can't mind his own business? Some people know the exact moment they lost everything. They can look back and see it plain as day and for the life of them can't understand why they didn't spot the situation as it was happening.""Among men and women, those in love do not always announce themselves, with declarations and vows. but they are the ones who weep when you're gone. Who miss you every single night, especially when the sky is so deep and beautiful, and the ground so very cold.""All over town tonight, the wind will drive women from their beds. They'll think of their first true love and search through their jewelry boxes for trinkets - gold lockets, ticket stubs, strands of hair. March would be one of those women, but instead she's here, on the road where there were once so many foxes. If truth be told, she's been here all this time, in their dark and windy place, like a ghost trapped inside the location of her memory."Even though this book dealt with circumstances that most people would find sick or disgraceful, I found the story to be very believable. The subject matters were haunting and even though you didn't want to think about what you were reading, you couldn't stop turning the pages. I am curious to read other Hoffman novels and see more of her writings. I also realize this story isn't for everyone.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    True love may be made in Heaven, but learning how to live with it and through it can sometimes be altogether different, here on earth. After nineteen years in California March Murray and her teenaged daughter, Gwen, come back to Fox Hill where March grew up, to see to the estate of the woman who raised March. March has spent a lifetime trying to avoid and deny her past, but coming home brings it all back into sharp focus. She confronts the stranger that her brother has become, the whispers of rumors that run through town, and Hollis, the boy she fell in love with when she was eleven years old, and never really stopped waiting for. This is the story, skillfully and subtly told, of what can happen when you finally get everything you thought you ever wanted. It is a story of jealousy and deceit, decay and degradation, courage and pain, woven by a master storyteller. It unfolds as delicately and as slowly as the petals of a rose, mesmerizing the reader to the point that you really don't notice the thorns until it's too late to pull back.Another excellent novel by Alice Hoffman.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Horrible novel- how'd it make it on Oprah's list? Hoffman spent so much time trying to align the plot to "Wuthering Heights" that she forgot to be original and make the story her own. The result is a perversion of Emily Bronte's tale that completely misses the point. March travels back to her hometown with her teen daughter Gwen for the funeral of her Nelly Dean-esque housekeeper. There, she meets up with Hollis, her childhood love that got away. The renew their love, but Hollis is bent on revenge and abuses her physically, emotionally, and sexually. Meanwhile Gwen finds romance with her Hareton, and all find themselves caught in Hollis' sick trap. There is no redemption for any of the characters; the survivors are only lucky to have escaped -- a denouement with the character development worthy of a Vincent Price film.Hoffman just doesn't get it- what makes the reader fall for Heathcliff despite his tyrannical ways is his undying passion for Catherine. He can abuse Isabella and trap young Catherine Linton into a loveless marriage, but the sheer force of his passion for his Catherine blows it all away. Hollis has no such passion for March. He is only fueled on revenge. Besides the physical abuse, Hollis cheats on March once he has her, completely disregarding any notion that Hollis may actually love or feel passion for March. Hoffman seems to have confused passion with rape. Their romantic scenes read like the worse bodice ripper. To complete the characterization of Hollis, Hoffman should have given him a long Snidely Whiplash mustache to twirl. Instead of spending so much time trying to get the characters to fit their "Wuthering Heights" mold so closely, Hoffman should have instead used the novel as a guide for exploring the relationships in her story. A more talented author could have made the distinction between healthy love and obsessive love without playing a game of "How perverted can I make this guy?" In fact, a more talented author did, and Hoffman was way over her head meddling with Bronte. As is, her treatment of March, and March's acceptance of it, is downright misogynistic and Hoffman should have known better, as should have Oprah.